Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:30:41.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a Better Nutritional Aiding in Disasters: Relying on Lessons Learned during the Bam Earthquake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2017

Mahmoud Nekouie Moghadam ,
Mohammadreza Amiresmaieli ,
Mohammad Hassibi ,
Farideh Doostan  and
Sajad Khosravi
Mahmoud Nekouie Moghadam
Affiliation:
Research Center for Modeling in Health, Institute for Future Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Mohammadreza Amiresmaieli
Affiliation:
Medical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Mohammad Hassibi
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Farideh Doostan
Affiliation:
Physiology Research Center, Department of Nutrition, School of Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Sajad Khosravi*
Affiliation:
Department of Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bam University of Medical Sciences, Bam, Iran
*
Correspondence: Department of Health Care Management School of Public Health Bam University of Medical Sciences Bam, Iran E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Examining various problems in the aftermath of disasters is very important to the disaster victims. Managing and coordinating food supply and its distribution among the victims is one of the most important problems after an earthquake. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to recognize problems and experiences in the field of nutritional aiding during an earthquake.

Methods

This qualitative study was of phenomenological type. Using the purposive sampling method, 10 people who had experienced nutritional aiding during the Bam Earthquake (Iran; 2003) were interviewed. Colaizzi’s method of analysis was used to analyze interview data.

Results

The findings of this study identified four main categories and 19 sub-categories concerning challenges in the nutritional aiding during the Bam Earthquake. The main topics included managerial, aiding, infrastructural, and administrative problems.

Conclusions

The major problems in nutritional aiding include lack of prediction and development of a specific program of suitable nutritional pattern and nutritional assessment of the victims in critical conditions. Forming specialized teams, educating team members about nutrition, and making use of experts’ knowledge are the most important steps to resolve these problems in the critical conditions; these measures are the duties of the relevant authorities.

Nekouie MoghadamM, AmiresmaieliM, HassibiM, DoostanF, KhosraviS. Toward a Better Nutritional Aiding in Disasters: Relying on Lessons Learned during the Bam Earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(4):382–386.

Keywords

Bamdisastersearthquakenutritional aiding
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 382 - 386
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no disclosures or conflicts of interest to report.

References

1. Araghizadeh, H, Saghafi Nia, M, Entezari, V. Analyzing medical management in disasters: a review of the Bam Earthquake experiences. J Mil Med. 2004;5(4):259-268.Google Scholar
2. Abolghasemi, H, Radfar, MH, Khatami, M, Nia, MS, Amid, A, Briggs, SM. International medical response to a natural disaster: lessons learned from the Bam earthquake experience. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(3):141-147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Nia, MS, Nafissi, N, Moharamzad, Y. Survey of Bam Earthquake survivors’ opinions on medical and health systems services. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(3):263-268.Google Scholar
4. Omidvar, B, Zafari, H, Derakhshan, S. Reconstruction management policies in residential and commercial sectors after the 2003 Bam earthquake in Iran. Nat Hazards. 2010;54(2):289-306.Google Scholar
5. Motamedi, HMK, Saghafinia, M, Bafarani, AH, Panahi, F. A reassessment and review of the Bam Earthquake five years onward: what was done wrong? Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(5):453-460.Google Scholar
6. Akbari, ME, Farshad, AA, Asadi-Lari, M. The devastation of Bam: an overview of health issues 1 month after the earthquake. Public Health. 2004;118(6):403-408.Google Scholar
7. Emami, MJ, Tavakoli, AR, Alemzadeh, H, et al. Strategies in evaluation and management of Bam Earthquake victims. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005;20(5):327-330.Google Scholar
8. Rabeian, M, Hosseini, S, Radabadi, M, Taheri Mirghaed, M, Bakhtiari, M. Evaluation of effective factors on the rate of preparedness of Tehran University of Medical Sciences’ selected hospitals in dealing with earthquake. Payavard. 2013;7(3):251-261.Google Scholar
9. Asef, MR. Modeling the elements of country vulnerability to earthquake disasters. Disasters. 2008;32(3):480-498.Google Scholar
10. Eitzen, EM Jr.. Education is the key to defense against bioterrorism. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(2):221-223.Google Scholar
11. Movaghar, AR, Goodarzi, RR, Izadian, E, Mohammadi, MR, Hosseini, M, Vazirian, M. The impact of Bam Earthquake on substance users in the first 2 weeks: a rapid assessment. J Urban Health. 2005;82(3):370-377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Gautschi, OP, Cadosch, D, Rajan, G, Zellweger, R. Earthquakes and trauma: review of triage and injury-specific, immediate care. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(2):195-201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. World Health Organization. A list of nutritional requirements can be obtained from expanded nutritional program. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2005.Google Scholar
14. United Nations World Food Program (UNWFP). Guideline for estimating food and nutritional needs in emergencies. Geneva, Switzerland: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees; 2005.Google Scholar
15. Katano, A. Role of the World Food Program in natural disasters and policy response in Asia. Implication for food security 2003 http://www1.wfp.org/.Google Scholar
16. Amiresmaili, M, Yazdi Feyzabadi, V, Khosravi, S. Factors affecting leave out of general practitioners from rural family physician program: a case of Kerman, Iran. Iran Int J Prev Med. 2014;5:1314-1323.Google Scholar
17. Ardalan, A, Masoomi, GR, Goya, MM, et al. Disaster health management: Iran’s progress and challenges. Iranian J Publ Health. 2009;38(1):93-97.Google Scholar
18. Farajzadeh, D, Tavakoli, R, Sarrafpour, R. Food preparation and programming models in crisis and disasters. Mil Med J. 2004;5(4):309-318.Google Scholar
19. Nobuyo Tsuboyama-Kasaoka, Martalena Br Purba. Nutrition and earthquakes: experience and recommendations. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2014;23(4):505-513.Google Scholar
20. Tavakoli, HR, Faraj Zade, D, Izadi, M, Jonaidi, N. The study of providing, preservation, and distribution of foodstuffs in Bam Earthquake. Mil Med J. 2008;10(1):11-20.Google Scholar
21. Moosazadeh, M, Zolala, F, Sheikhzadeh, KH, Safiri, S, Amiresmaili, M. Response to the Bam Earthquake: a qualitative study on the experiences of the top and middle level health managers in Kerman, Iran. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(4):1-5.Google Scholar