Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:35:26.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standing Orders for Field Intravenous Lines Do Not Shorten Prehospital Time in Trauma Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Bartholomew J. Tortella ,
Robert F. Lavery ,
Ronald P. Cody  and
Mindi Salant
Bartholomew J. Tortella*
Affiliation:
Section of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Medicineand Dentistry of New Jersey, The New Jersey Trauma Center and University Hospital, Newark, N.J. Department of Trauma and Emergency Medical Services, University Hospital, Newark, N.J.
Robert F. Lavery
Affiliation:
Section of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Medicineand Dentistry of New Jersey, The New Jersey Trauma Center and University Hospital, Newark, N.J. Department of Trauma and Emergency Medical Services, University Hospital, Newark, N.J.
Ronald P. Cody
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental and Community Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School—UMDNJ, Piscataway, N.J.
Mindi Salant
Affiliation:
Section of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Medicineand Dentistry of New Jersey, The New Jersey Trauma Center and University Hospital, Newark, N.J. Department of Trauma and Emergency Medical Services, University Hospital, Newark, N.J. Deceased
*
University Hospital, Rm. J-200, 150 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07103-2406USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Study Objective:

No randomized, prospective studies have been conducted that examine how standing orders for establishing intravenous (IV) lines in trauma patients affect prehospital time. The purpose of this randomized, prospective study was to determine if standing orders for IV lines in the field shorten prehospital time.

Design:

A prospective, randomized study was conducted.

Setting:

Trauma patients (n = 521) were randomized prospectively on an even-/odd-day basis over a one-year period from 1 April 1988 to 1 April 1989. Patients were sorted into an IV Standing Orders (SO) arm (n = 258) and a No Standing Orders (NO) arm (n = 263) in which On-Line [Direct] Medical Command (OLMC) was required before IV initiation.

Participants:

Trauma patients, paramedics in a high-volume, urban, EMS system, and medical-command physicians on the trauma team at a Level 1 trauma center.

Results:

No significant differences were found in demographics, prehospital vital signs, mechanism of injury, or trauma severity scores between the two treatment arms. Scene times were similar for the two groups (IV SO = 11.4 minutes, and NO = 10.6 minutes, p = .1675) as was IV success rate (92% vs. 88%, p = .1729).

Conclusion:

When compared to OLMC in this EMS system, IV standing orders did not affect scene time. This supports the concept that only spinal stabilization and airway management be performed at the scene and other ALS maneuvers (e.g., IVs) be performed in the ambulance, preferably en route to a Trauma Center. Since IV standing orders had no documented, adverse effects and led to focused, concise radio telemetry reports, this EMS system adopted their use on a permanent basis.

Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 271 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, 17 January 1991.

References

1. Nagel, EL, Hirchmann, JC, Nussenfield, SR, et al. : Telemetry-medical command in coronary and other mobile emergency care systems. JAMA 1970; 214;332–388.Google Scholar
2. Lambrew, CT: The experience of the electrocardiogram to a base hospital. Heart and Lung 1974;3:756–764.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Lambrew, CT, Schaman, WL, Cannon, TH: Emergency medical transport systems: Use of ECG telemetry. Chest 1973;63:477–482.Google Scholar
4. Erder, MH, Davidson, SJ, Cheney, RA: On-line medical command in theory and practice. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:261–268.Google Scholar
5. Cayten, CG, Oler, J, Walker, K, et al. : The effect of telemetry on urban prehospital cardiac care. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:976–981.Google Scholar
6. Pozen, MW, D'Agonstino, RB, Sytkowski, PA, et al. : Effectiveness of prehospital medical control systems: An analysis of the interaction between emergency room physicians and paramedics. Circulation1 1981;63:442–447.Google Scholar
7. Champion, HR, Sacco, WJ, Gainer, PS, et al. : The effect of medical direction on trauma triage. J Trauma 1989;28:235–259.Google Scholar
8. Neely, KW, Norton, R, Butkus, E, et al. : The effect of base station contact on ambulance destination. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:906–909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Border, JR, Lewis, FR, Aprahamian, C, et al. : Panel: Prehospital trauma care—Stabilize or scoop and run. J Trauma 1983;23:708–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Smith, JP, Bodai, BI: The urban paramedic's scope of practice. JAMA 1985;253:544–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Ornato, JP, Groen, AL: Superiority of standing orders to start an IV during cardiac arrest over base station orders. Nebraska Med J 1985:200–201.Google Scholar
12. Holroyd, BR, Knoop, RK, Kallson, G: Medical Control. JAMA 1986;256:1027–1031.Google Scholar
13. Stewart, RD: When less is more: Teflon and telemetry in the space age. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:992–993. Editorial.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Gold, CR: Prehospital advanced life support versus “scoop and run” in trauma management. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:797–801.Google Scholar
15. Pointer, JE, Osur, MA: Effect of standing orders on field times. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:1119–1121.Google Scholar
16. Pons, PT, Honigman, B, Moore, EE, et al. : Prehospital advanced life support for critical penetrating wounds to the thorax and abdomen. J Trauma 1985:25:628–631.Google Scholar
17. Honigman, B, Rohweder, K, Moore, EE, et al. : Prehospital advanced trauma life support of penetrating cardiac wounds. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:145–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. O'Gorman, M, Trabulsky, O, Pilcher, D: Zero-time prehospital IV. J Trauma 1989;29:84–86.Google Scholar
19. Pons, PT, Moore, EE, Cusik, JM, et al. : Prehospital venous access in an urban paramedic system—A prospective on-scene analysis. J Trauma 1988;28:1460–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Jones, SE, Nesper, TP, Alcouloumre, E: Prehospital intravenous line placement: A prospective study. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:244–246.Google Scholar