Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:57:39.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of Exercises and Drills in the Evaluation of Public Health in Emergency Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Kristine M. Gebbie
Affiliation:
Center for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA
Joan Valas*
Affiliation:
Center for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA
Jacqueline Merrill
Affiliation:
Center for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA
Stephen Morse
Affiliation:
National Center for Disaster Preparedness, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
*
Joan Valas, MS, RN Columbia University School of Nursing, Center for Health Policy, 630 West 168th Street-Mail Code 6, New York, NY 10032, USA E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

Public health agencies have been participating in emergency preparedness exercises for many years. A poorly designed or executed exercise, or an unevaluated or inadequately evaluated plan, may do more harm than good if it leads to a false sense of security, and results in poor performance during an actual emergency. At the time this project began, there were no specific standards for the public health aspects of exercises and drills, and no defined criteria for the evaluation of agency performance in public health.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to develop defined criteria for the evaluation of agency performance.

Method:

A Delphi panel of 26 experts in the field participated in developing criteria to assist in the evaluation of emergency exercise performance, and facilitate measuring improvement over time. Candidate criteria were based on the usual parts of an emergency plan and three other frameworks used elsewhere in public health or emergency response.

Results:

The response rate from the expert panel for Delphi Round I was 74%, and for Delphi Round II was 55%. This final menu included 46 public health-agency level criteria grouped into nine categories for use in evaluating an emergency drill or exercise at the local public health level.

Conclusion:

Use of the public health-specific criteria developed through this process will allow for specific assessment and planning for measurable improvement in a health agency over time.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Cope, JR: Workforce Competencies for emergency preparedness (US) National Association of County and City Health Officials Exchange 2003;1(2):12.Google Scholar
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Bioterrorism & emergency readiness: competencies for all public health workers. Available at http://www.nursing.hs.columbia.edu/institute-centers/chphsr/btcomps.html. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Capacity inventory. Available at http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/od/inventory/index.asp. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar
4.Allan, S: The challenges of local preparedness for bioterrorism and other emergencies. (US) National Association of County and City Health Officials Exchange 2002;1(1):15.Google Scholar
5.Firshien, J: Public health preparedness for disaster: Perspective from Washington, D.C. J Urban Health 2002;79(1):67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Barbera, JA, MacIntyre, AG: The reality of the modern bioterrorism response. In: The Lancet Supplement Vol. 360. Available at http://thelancet.com. Accessed 14 June 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Morse, A: Bioterrorism Preparedness for Local Health Departments. J Community Health Nurs 2002;19(4):203211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Simmons, SC, Murphy, TA, Blanarovich, A, et al: Telehealth technologies and applications for terrorism response: A report of the 2002 coastal North Carolina domestic preparedness training exercise. J Am Inform Assoc 2003;10(2):166176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health alert network. Available at http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/han/Index.asp2001. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar
10. New York City Office of Emergency Management. Keeping New York prepared: An overview of the New York City Office of Emergency Management. http://nyc.gov/htm/oem/pdf/oem_briefing_document.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar
11. National Association of County and City Health Officials: Project Public Health Ready. Available at http://www.naccho.org/topics/emergency/pphr.cfm. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar
12.Ford, JK, Schmidt, AM: Emergency response training: Strategies for enhancing real world performance. Journal of Hazardous Material 2000;75(2–3):195215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. National Association of County and City Health Officials. Bt Create: A customizable bioterrorism tabletop exercise builder. Available at http://www.naccho.org/prod141.cfm. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar
14.Gebbie, KM, Merrill, JA, Hwang, I, et al: Identifying individual competency in emerging areas of practice: An applied approach. Qual Health Res 2002;12(7):990999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Turnock, BJ: Roadmap for public health workforce preparedness. J Public Health Manag Pract 2003;9(6):471480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Kerby, DS, Brand, MW, Johnson, DL, Ghouri, FS: Self-assessment in the measurement of public health workforce preparedness for bioterrorism or other public health disasters. Public Health Rep 2005;120(2):186191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Qureshi, KA, Gershon, RR, Merrill, JA, et al: Effectiveness of an emergency preparedness training program for public health nurses in New York City. Fam Community Health 2004;27(3):242249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Columbia University School of Nursing, Center for Health Policy: Clinical competencies during initial assessment and management of emergency events. Available at http://www.cumc.columbia.edu/dept/nursing/institutescenters/chphsr/clinician-comps.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar
19. US Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency: State and local guide (SLG) 101: Guide of all-hazards emergency operations planning. Available at http://www.fema.gov.pdf/rrr/slf101.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar
20. Columbia University School of Nursing Center for Health Policy: Defining emergency exercises: A working guide to the terminology. Available at http://www.cumc.columbia.edu/dept/nursing/institutes-centers/chphsr/defexer.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar
21. US Department of Homeland Security, Office for Domestic Preparedness: Homeland security exercise and evaluation program—Volume I: Overview and doctrine. Available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/docs/HSEEPv1.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar
22. US Department of Homeland Security, Office for Domestic Preparedness: Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program—Volume II: Exercise Evaluation and Improvement. Available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/docs/HSEEPv1.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar
23. US Department of Homeland Security, Office for Domestic Preparedness: Homeland security exercise and evaluation program—Volume III: Exercise program management and exercise planning process. Available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/docs/HSEEPv3.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar
24. Public Health Functions Steering Committee: Public health in American essential public health services. Available at http://www.health.gov/phfunctions/public.htm. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar
25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Continuation guidance for cooperative agreement on public health preparedness and response for bioterrorism—Budget year five. Available at http://www.bt.cdc.gov/planning/continuationguidance/index.asp. Accessed 14 June 2005.Google Scholar