Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:26:15.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Quality of Hospital Disaster Plans in Belgium: Evaluation Research. Development and Content Validity of a Questionnaire to Define the Quality Key Performance Indicators Influencing Hospital Disaster Preparedness: A Modified Delphi Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Christel Hendrickx
Affiliation:
VUB, Jette, Belgium University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
Brenda van Delft
Affiliation:
VUB, Jette, Belgium
Ignace Demeyer
Affiliation:
OLVZ Aalst, Aalst, Belgium
Luc Mortelmans
Affiliation:
ZNA Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium REGEDIM, Research Group on Emergency and Disaster Medicine Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium
Lieve Peremans
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
Marc Sabbe
Affiliation:
University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Davide Colombo
Affiliation:
Intensive Care, SS Trinità Hospital, Borgomanero, Italy CRIMEDIM, Research Center University of Piemonte Orientale “Amadeo Avogadro”, Novara, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Emergency and disaster situations have a major impact on hospitals, some of which are already overloaded daily. The recent COVID-19 outbreak, attacks in Brussels, floods in Wallonia and influx of Ukrainian refugees show that the risk of facing a disaster and involvement of local hospitals (and stakeholders) is real. However, how hospitals implement their own hospital disaster plan (HDP), the position of the hospital disaster coordinator (HDC) and the real efficacy of these measures remain unclear. Therefore, an evaluation tool with an expert-consensus set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and an evaluation of the HDC position is needed

Method:

A semi-quantitative survey, as part of evaluation research, was designed by a research group. This questionnaire was based on the document analysis of the main topics of the national template and accompanying legislation. To establish consensus on the importance of the KPIs concerning the HDP, a three-round email-based modified Delphi study (Policy Delphi) was undertaken.

Results:

For a task group, 15 qualified multidisciplinary professionals (in-hospital) agreed to participate, 11 completed all rounds. As a pilot group, a total of 25 ‘experts on the field’, were purposively selected from Belgian hospitals, nine of them completed the questionnaire. The modified Delphi reached the agreed consensus threshold (i.e.75%), resulting in five main themes: demographic characteristics/profile HDC, hospital incident management system (HIMS), pre-incident phase, incident phase, post-incident phase. Collectively including a core set of 289 KPIs (29 indicators to assess progress concerning the HDC position).

Conclusion:

This study employed a modified Delphi approach to establish consensus, resulting in the development of an evaluation tool to measure hospital disaster preparedness and to evaluate progress of the HDC position within Belgian hospitals. All indicators were considered relevant and immediately implementable. When the implementation of KPIs is completed, the statement is that a HIMS exists within the hospitals.

Type
Lightning and Oral Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine