Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:19:07.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Public Health Response Actions and the Use of Emergency Operations Centers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

A. Thomas Mignone Jr
Affiliation:
US Public Health Service, New York, New York, USA
Robert Davidson*
Affiliation:
US Public Health Service, New York, New York, USA
*
US Public Health Service, 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3835, New York, NY 10278 USA, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In the wake of 11 September 2001, many public health agencies are reassessing their institutional capabilities and procedures to respond to mass-casualty incidents involving weapons of mass destruction. Prior to the fall of 2001, planning by the public health and other sectors addressed more conventional or naturally occurring events such as earthquakes, hurricanes, tornados, and chemical spills, although attacks with weapons of mass destruction were a growing concern. While the nature of natural versus intentional events differs, the management and coordination of response activities to them follows the same incident command system.

A major lesson learned during the response operations to the 11 September 2001 attacks in New York City was the value of disaster planning, conducting exercises, and developing relationships among the various response agencies. Although New York City's physical Emergency Operations Center (EOC) at 7 World Trade Center was destroyed in the attack, the medical and health response community was able to react effectively to the possibility of mass casualties as well as to the more usual needs. This was enabled by the pre-existing relationships that had been developed between city, state, federal, and non-governmental agencies while planning and exercising for such events and their aftermaths.

Type
Special Reports
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as Amended, 42 U.S.C. 5121, et seq., 1999a.Google Scholar
2.Pan American Health Organization: Disasters—Preparedness and Mitigation in the Americas (Issue No. 89). Washington, DC: Pan-American Health Organization, 2002.Google Scholar
3.Institute of Medicine, Manning, Goldfrank, (eds): Tools for Evaluating the Metropolitan Medical Response Program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002. p 35.Google Scholar
4.Institute of Medicine: The Future of the Public's Health in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002. p 26.Google Scholar