Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T00:33:50.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prospective Evaluation of Point-of-Care Ultrasound at a Remote, Multi-Day Music Festival

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2018

Ross Prager ,
Colin Sedgwick ,
Adam Lund ,
Daniel Kim Open the ORCID record for Daniel Kim [Opens in a new window] ,
Ben Ho ,
Maja Stachura  and
Samuel Gutman
Ross Prager*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Colin Sedgwick
Affiliation:
MD Undergraduate Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Adam Lund
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Daniel Kim
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Department of Emergency Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Ben Ho
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Maja Stachura
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Department of Emergency Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Samuel Gutman
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
*
Correspondence: Ross T. Prager, MD c/o Dr. Samuel Gutman Lions Gate Hospital Emergency Department 231 15th St E North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V7L 2L7 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) has become an important diagnostic tool for hospital-based clinicians. This study assesses the role of POCUS at Pemberton Music Festival 2016 (Pemberton, British Columbia [BC], Canada), a remote mass gathering where physicians face limited resources, complex disposition decisions, and a dynamic clinical environment.

Objectives

This study prospectively evaluated the impact of POCUS on patient diagnosis, management, and disposition based on the self-report of the study physicians. The authors hypothesized that having ultrasound available for use would aid in diagnostic and management decisions and would reduce the need to transfer patients off-site to other health care facilities, reducing impact on the acute health services in the host community.

Methods

A handheld ultrasound was available for use by physicians in the main medical tent. All participating physicians self-reported their training and comfort using POCUS. After each POCUS scan, physicians completed a survey and recorded the indication for use, scans performed, and impact on patient diagnosis, management, and disposition.

Results

In total, POCUS was used on 28 of the 686 patients treated in the main medical tent; POCUS was reported to narrow the differential diagnosis in 64% of cases and altered the working diagnosis in 21% of cases. Its use changed the management plan in 39% of patients. Its use was reported to reduce the burden on broader health care resource utilization in 46% of cases and prevented ambulance transport off-site in 32% of cases (nine cases in total). This corresponded to an absolute risk reduction of 1.3% for the percentage of patients transferred to hospital (PPTH; relative risk reduction of 53%).

Conclusion:

Physicians reported that POCUS improved the diagnosis, management, and disposition of select patients at a remote, multi-day music festival. Also, POCUS reduced ambulance transfers off-site and reduced the perceived burden on broader health care utilization.

PragerR, SedgwickC, LundA, KimD, HoB, StachuraM, GutmanS. Prospective Evaluation of Point-of-Care Ultrasound at a Remote, Multi-Day Music Festival. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(5):484–489.

Keywords

diagnostic ultrasoundmass-gathering medicineultrasonography
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 33 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 484 - 489
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: AL leads a university-linked academic program in mass-gathering medicine. AL has worked for over 30 years in volunteer and contracted roles as a clinician and medical director at mass-gathering events and is a co-owner of several companies related to the provision of medical services. SG is president of Rockdoc Consulting Inc. (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). Rockdoc is a commercial provider of event medical services. Rockdoc was contracted to provide medical services for the Pemberton Music Festival (Pemberton, British Columbia, Canada). All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

1. Grant, WD, Nacca, NE, Prince, LA, Scott, JM. Mass-gathering medical care: retrospective analysis of patient presentations over five years at a multi-day mass gathering. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010; 25(2):183-187.Google Scholar
2. Hutton, A, Ranse, J, Verdonk, N, Ullah, S, Arbon, P. Understanding the characteristics of patient presentations of young people at outdoor music festivals. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(2):160-166.Google Scholar
3. Turris, SA, Lund, A. Mortality at music festivals: academic and grey literature for case finding. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017; 32(1):58-63.Google Scholar
4. Lund, A, Turris, SA. Mass-gathering medicine: risks and patient presentations at a 2-day electronic dance music event. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015; 30(3):271-278.Google Scholar
5. Lund, A, Turris, SA, Bowles, R. Conceptualizing the impact of special events on community health service levels: an operational analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014; 29(5):525-531.Google Scholar
6. Pemberton Valley: Current Population. Pemberton Chamber Web site 2006. https://www.pembertonchamber.com/pemberton/resources/demographics/current-population/. Accessed February 6, 2018.Google Scholar
7. Population and Dwelling Count Highlight Tables, 2011. Canadian Census 2011. http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/hlt-fst/pd-pl/Table-Tableau.cfm?LANG=Eng&T=802&SR=1&S=3&O=D&RPP=9999&CMA=0&PR=59. Accessed February 6, 2018.Google Scholar
8. Moore, CL, Copel, JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(8):749-757.Google Scholar
9. Kirkpatrick, AW, Brown, DR, Crickmer, S, et al. Hand-held portable sonography for the on-mountain exclusion of a pneumothorax. Wilderness Environ Med. 2001;12(4):270-272.Google Scholar
10. Nations, JA, Browning, RF. Battlefield applications for handheld ultrasound. Ultrasound Q. 2011;27(3):171-176.Google Scholar
11. Sargsyan, AE, Hamilton, DR, Jones, JA, et al. FAST at MACH 20: clinical ultrasound aboard the International Space Station. J Trauma. 2005; 58(1):35-39.Google Scholar
12. Marshburn, TH, Hadfield, CA, Sargsyan, AE, Garcia, K, Ebert, D, Dulchavsky, SA. New heights in ultrasound: first report of spinal ultrasound from the international space station. J Emerg Med. 2014; 46(1):61-70.Google Scholar
13. Sippel, S, Muruganandan, K, Levine, A, Shah, S. Review article: use of ultrasound in the developing world. Int J Emerg Med. 2011;4:72.Google Scholar
14. Whitson, MR, Mayo, PH. Ultrasonography in the emergency department. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):227.Google Scholar
15. Arntfield, RT, Millington, SJ. Point of care cardiac ultrasound applications in the emergency department and intensive care unit--a review. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2012;8(2):98-108.Google Scholar
16. Shekelle, PG, Pronovost, PJ, Wachter, RM, et al. The top patient safety strategies that can be encouraged for adoption now. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 Pt 2):365-368.Google Scholar
17. Fleming, S, Bird, R, Ratnasingham, K, Sarker, SJ, Walsh, M, Patel, B. Accuracy of FAST scan in blunt abdominal trauma in a major London trauma centre. Int J Surg. 2012;10(9):470-474.Google Scholar
18. Abdulrahman, Y, Musthafa, S, Hakim, SY, et al. Utility of extended FAST in blunt chest trauma: is it the time to be used in the ATLS algorithm? World J Surg. 2015;39(1):172-178.Google Scholar
19. Smith, ZA, Wood, D. Emergency focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) and hemodynamic stability. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(4):273-277.Google Scholar
20. Alrajab, S, Youssef, AM, Akkus, NI, Caldito, G. Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R208.Google Scholar
21. Zinman, R, Bethune, P, Camfield, C, Fitzpatrick, E, Gordon, K. An observational asthma study alters emergency department use: the Hawthorne effect. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1996;12(2):78-80.Google Scholar
22. Campbell, JP, Maxey, VA, Watson, WA. Hawthorne effect: implications for prehospital research. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26(5):590-594.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Prager et al. supplementary material

Prager et al. supplementary material 1

Download Prager et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 520.1 KB