Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:44:28.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physical Health of Members of the Public Who Experienced Terrorist Bombings in London on 07 July 2005

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Michael A. Catchpole  and
Oliver Morgan
Michael A. Catchpole*
Affiliation:
On behalf of the London Bombings Steering Group, Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, London, UK
Oliver Morgan
Affiliation:
On behalf of the London Bombings Steering Group, Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, London, UK
*
Deputy Director Centre for Infections Health Protection Agency 61 Colindale Avenue London NW9 5EQ UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

On 07 July 2005, four bombs were detonated in London, killing 52 members of the public. Approximately 700 individuals received treatment either at the scene or at nearby hospitals.

Hypothesis/Problem:

Significant concerns about the potential long-term psychological and physical health effects of exposure to the explosions were raised immediately after the bombings. To address these concerns, a public health register was established for the purpose of following-up with individuals exposed to the explosions.

Methods:

Invitations to enroll in the register were sent to individuals exposed to the explosions. A range of health, emergency, and humanitarian service records relating to the response to the explosions were used to identify eligible individuals. Follow-up was undertaken through self-administered questionnaires. The number of patients exposed to fumes, smoke, dust, and who experienced blood splashes, individuals who reported injuries, and the type and duration of health symptoms were calculated. Odds ratios of health symptoms by exposure for greater or less than 30 minutes were calculated.

Results:

A total of 784 eligible individuals were identified, of whom, 258 (33%) agreed to participate in the register, and 173 (22%) returned completed questionnaires between 8 to 23 months after the explosions. The majority of individuals reported exposure to fumes, smoke, or dust, while more than two-fifths also reported exposure to blood. In addition to cuts and puncture wounds, the most frequent injury was ear damage. Most individuals experienced health symptoms for less than four weeks, with the exception of hearing problems, which lasted longer. Four-fifths of individuals felt that they had suffered emotional distress and half of them were receiving counseling.

Conclusions:

The results indicated that the main long-term health effects, apart from those associated with traumatic amputations, were hearing loss and psychological disorders. While these findings provide a degree of reassurance of the absence of long-term effects, the low response rate limits the extent to which this can be extrapolated to all those exposed to the bombings. Given the importance of immediate assessment of the range and type of exposure and injury in incidents such as the London bombings, and the difficulties in contacting individuals after the immediate response phase, there is need to develop better systems for identifying and enrolling exposed individuals into post-incident health monitoring.

Keywords

bombingsfollow-uphearing lossLondonLondon bombingsphysical health effectsregistersunderground
Type
Research Article
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 139 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Intelligence and Security Committee. Report into the London Terrorist Attacks on 7 July 2005. Available at http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/publications/reports/intelligence/govres_7july.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2006.Google Scholar
2. Ryan, J, Montgomery, H: The London attacks—Preparedness: Terrorism and the medical response. N Engl J Med 2005;353(6):543–545.10.1056/NEJMp058177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: Proceedings: Expert Panel on Public Health Registries, May 13th, 2004. ASTDR, Atlanta, 2004.Google Scholar
4. Whalley, MG, Brewin, CR: Mental health following terrorist attacks. Brit J Psychiatry 2007;190:94–96.10.1192/bjp.bp.106.026427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Brewin, CR, Andrews, B, Valentine, JD: Meta-analysis of risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68:748–766.10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.748CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Holbrook, TL, Hoyt, DB, Stein, MB, Sieber, WJ: Gender differences in long-term posttraumatic stress disorder outcomes after major trauma: Women are at higher risk of adverse outcomes than men. J Trauma 2002:53:882–888.10.1097/00005373-200211000-00012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. North, CS, Pfefferbaum, B, Tivis, Kawasaki A, Reddy, C, Spitznagel, EL: The course of post traumatic stress disorder in a follow-up study of survivors of the Oklahoma City bombing. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2004:16:209–215.10.1080/10401230490522034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Johansen, VA, Wahl, AK, Eilertsen, DE, Weisaeth, L: Prevalence and predictors of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in physically injured victims of non-domestic violence. A longitudinal study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007;42:583–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Grieger, TA, Cozza, SJ, Ursano, RJ, Hoge, C, Martinez, PE, Engel, CC, Wain, HJ: Posttraumatic stress disorder and depression in battle-injured soldiers. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:1777–1783.10.1176/ajp.2006.163.10.1777CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Rubin, J, Wessely, S: Psychological reactions to the London bombings. The Magazine of the Health Protection Agency 2007;7:20–22.Google Scholar
11. Brackbill, RM, Thorpe, LE, DiGrande, L, Perrin, M, Sapp, JH, Wu, D, Campolucci, S, Walker, DJ, Cone, J, Pulliam, P, Thalji, L, Farfel, MR, Thomas, P: Surveillance for World Trade Center disaster health effects among survivors of collapsed and damaged buildings. MMWR Surveillance Summ 2006:55:1–18.Google ScholarPubMed
12. Shariat, S, Mallonee, S, Kruger, E, Farmer, K, North, C. A prospective study of long-term health outcomes among Oklahoma City bombing survivors. J Okla State Med Assoc 1999;92(4):178–186.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Donker, GA, Yzermans, CJ, Spreeuwenberg, P, van der Zee, J: Symptom attribution after a plane crash: comparison between self-reported symptoms and GP records. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52(484):917–922.Google ScholarPubMed
14. Brewin, CR, Rose, S, Andrews, B, Green, J, Tata, P, McEvedy, C, Turner, S, Foa, EB: Brief screening instrument for post-traumatic stress disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2002;181:157–162.10.1017/S0007125000161896CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Cohen, JT, Ziv, G, Bloom, J, Zikk, D, Rapoport, Y, Himmelfarb, MZ: Blast injury of the ear in a confined space explosion: auditory and vestibular evaluation. Isr Med Assoc J 2002;4(7):559–562.Google Scholar
16. de Ceballos, JP, Turegano-Fuentes, F, Perez-Diaz, D, Sanz-Sanchez, M, Martin-Llorente, C, Guerrero-Sanz, JE: 11 March 2004: The terrorist bomb explosions in Madrid, Spain—An analysis of the logistics, injuries sustained and clinical management of casualties treated at the closest hospital. Crit Care 2005;9(1):104–111.10.1186/cc2995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Wilson, J, Murray, V Kettle: The July 2005 London Bombings: Environmental monitoring for non-infectious materials release, and initial health risk assessment. Chemical Hazards and Poisons Report 2008;12:11–13.Google Scholar
18. Boscarino, JA, Figley, CR, Adams, RE, Galea, S, Resnick, H, Fleischman, AR, Bucuvalas, M, Gold, J: Adverse reactions associated with studying persons recently exposed to mass urban disaster. J Nerv Ment Dis 2004;192(8):515–524.Google ScholarPubMed
19. Weisaeth, L: Importance of high response rates in traumatic stress research. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1989;355:131–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Braverman, I, Wexler, D, Oren, M: A novel mode of infection with hepatitis B: Penetrating bone fragments due to the explosion of a suicide bomber. Isr Med Assoc J 2002;4(7):528–529.Google Scholar
21.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Recommendations for postexpo-sure interventions to prevent infection with Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis C virus, or human immunodeficiency virus, and tetanus in persons wounded during bombings and similar mass-casualty events—United States, 2008. MMWR 2008;57:(No RR-6).Google Scholar
22. Bascetta, C: September 11. Monitoring of World Trade Center health effects has progressed, but not for federal responders. A testimony before the Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations, Committee on Government Reform, [US] House of Representatives, 2006, p 19.Google Scholar
23. Slottje, P, Huizink, AC, Twisk, JW, Witteveen, AB, van der Ploeg, HM, Bramsen, I, Smidt, N, Bijlsma, JA, Bouter, LM, van Mechelen, W, Smid, T: Epidemiological study air disaster in Amsterdam (ESADA): Study design. BMC Public Health 2005;5:54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Landrigan, PJ, Lioy, PJ, Thurston, G, Berkowitz, G, Chen, LC, Chillrud, SN, Gavett, SH, Georgopoulos, PG, Geyh, AS, Levin, S, Perera, F, Rappaport, SM, Small, C, the NIEHS World Trade Center Working Group: Health and environmental consequences of the world trade center disaster. Environ Health Perspect 2004;112(6):731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Morgan, O, Verlander, NQ, Kennedy, F, Moore, M, Birch, S, Kearney, J, Lewthwaite, P, Lewis, R, O'Brian, S, Osman, J, Reacher, M: Exposures and reported symptoms associated with occupational deployment to the Buncefield fuel depot fire, England 2005. Occup Environ Med 2008;65(6):404–411.10.1136/oem.2007.035303CrossRefGoogle Scholar