Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:45:53.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oxygen Delivery Performance of Four Adult Resuscitation Bags*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Thomas A. Barnes
Affiliation:
From the College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professionals, Respiratory Therapy Program, Northeastern University, Boston MA, USA.
Mary E. Watson
Affiliation:
From the College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professionals, Respiratory Therapy Program, Northeastern University, Boston MA, USA.

Extract

The Vitalograph bag resuscitator with the old and new reservoirs, the PMR 1, the PMR 2, and the Laerdal bag resuscitator were studied at various oxygen flowrates and ventilation patterns, with and without oxygen reservoirs, to determine fractional delivered oxygen (FDO2) and function of patient valves. The Vitalograph with the new or the old reservoir and the PMR 1 cannot deliver high oxygen concentrations (FDO2 > 0.90) and should not be used when high FDO2 is important. The PMR 2 and the Laerdal cannot deliver high oxygen concentrations without a reservoir attached; but with a reservoir and oxygen flowrates of 101/min the Laerdal does achieve FDO2 > 0.98, and at 15 1/min the PMR 2 does achieve > 0.90.

Type
Part II: Clinical Care Topics
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Berminger, G, Forrette, M. Adult manual resuscitators. Curr Rev Respir Ther 1979;1:115119.Google Scholar
2. Carden, E, Bernstein, M. Investigation of the nine most commonly used resuscitator bags. JAMA 1970;212:589592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Carden, E, Freidman, D. Further studies of manually operated self-inflating resuscitator bags. Anesth Analg 1977;56:202206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Carden, E, Hughes, T. An evaluation of manually operated self-inflating resuscitation bags. Anesth Analg 1975;54:133138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Emergency Care Research Institute. Evaluation-manually operated resuscitators. Health Devices 1971;1:1317.Google Scholar
6. Emergency Care Research Institute. Evaluation-manually operated infant resuscitators. Health Devices 1973;2:240248.Google Scholar
7. Emergency Care Research Institute. Evaluation-manually operated resuscitators. Health Devices 1974;3:164176.Google Scholar
8. Emergency Care Research Institute. Manual resuscitators. Health Devices 1979;8:133146.Google Scholar
9. Fitzmaurice, M, Barnes, T. Oxygen delivery performance of three adultresuscitation bags. Respir Care 1980;25:928933.Google Scholar
10. LeBouef, L. 1980 assessment of eight adult manual resuscitators. Respir Care 1980;25:11361142.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Priano, L, Ham, J. A simple method to increase the FDO2 of resuscitators. Respir Care 1980;25:11361142.Google Scholar
12. Redick, L, Dunbar, R, MacDougall, D, Merket, TAn evaluation of handoperated self-inflating resuscitationequipment. Anesth Analg 1970;49:2832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Redick, L, Hand-operated self-inflating resuscitation equipment. Anesth Analg 1971,50:554556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Steinbach, B, Carden, E. 1973 assessment of eight adult resuscitator bags. Respir Care 1975,20:6976.Google ScholarPubMed
15. Vottery, B. Hand-operatedemer, emergency ventilation devices. Heart and Lung 1972;1:26.Google Scholar
16. White, R, Gilles, B, Polk B Oxygen delivery by hand-operated emergency ventilation devices. Jour Am Coll Emer Phys 1973;2:25.Google Scholar
17. Long, V. Manuelle beatmung von fruh, Neugeborenen und kindern. Asasth Prax 1974;9:6770.Google Scholar
18. Klick, J, Bushnell, L, Bancroft, M. Barotrauma. A potential hazard of manual resuscitators. Anesth 1978;49:363365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed