Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:35:25.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Triage Support Tool in Case of Explosion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2018

Olivier Yavari-Sartakhti*
Affiliation:
Paris Fire Brigade – Emergency Medical Department, Paris, France
Frédérique Briche
Affiliation:
Paris Fire Brigade – Emergency Medical Department, Paris, France
Daniel Jost
Affiliation:
Paris Fire Brigade – Emergency Medical Department, Paris, France
Nicolas Michaud
Affiliation:
Paris Fire Brigade – Communication Department, Paris, France
Michel Bignand
Affiliation:
Paris Fire Brigade – Emergency Medical Department, Paris, France
Jean-Pierre Tourtier
Affiliation:
Paris Fire Brigade – Emergency Medical Department, Paris, France
*
Correspondence: Olivier Yavari-Sartakhti, MD Paris Fire Brigade - Emergency Medical Department 1, Place Jules Renard 75017 Paris, France E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Deafness frequently observed in explosion victims, currently following terrorist attack, is a barrier to communication between victims and first responders. This may result in a delay in the initial triage and evacuation. In such situations, Paris Fire Brigade (Paris, France) proposes the use of assistance cards to help conscious, but deafened patients at the site of an attack where there may be numerous victims.

Yavari-SartakhtiO, BricheF, JostD, MichaudN, BignandM, TourtierJP. A New Triage Support Tool in Case of Explosion. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(2):213–214.

Type
Special Reports
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

References

1. Leibovici, D, Gofrit, ON, Stein, M, et al. J. Blast injuries: bus versus open-air bombings, a comparative study of injuries in survivors of open-air versus confined-space explosions. J Trauma. 1996;41(6):1030-1035.Google Scholar
2. Golan, R, Soffer, D, Givon, A, Israel Trauma Group, Peleg, K. The ins and outs of terrorist bus explosions: injury profiles of on-board explosions versus explosions occurring adjacent to a bus. Injury. 2014;45(1):39-43.Google Scholar
3. Aschkenasy-Steuer, G, Shamir, M, Rivkind, A, et al. Clinical review: the Israeli experience, conventional terrorism and critical care. Crit Care. 2005;9(5):490-499.Google Scholar
4. Leibovici, D, Gofrit, ON, Shapira, SC. Eardrum perforation in explosion survivors: is it a marker of pulmonary blast injury? Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(2):168-172.Google Scholar
5. Rozenfeld, M, Givon, A, Shenhar, G, Renert, L, Peleg, K. A new paradigm of injuries from terrorist explosions as a function of explosion setting type. Ann Surg. 2016;263(6):1228-1234.Google Scholar
6. de Ceballos, JP, Turégano-Fuentes, F, Perez-Diaz, D, Sanz-Sanchez, M, Martin-Llorente, C, Guerrero-Sanz, JE. 11 March 2004: The terrorist bomb explosions in Madrid, Spain, an analysis of the logistics, injuries sustained and clinical management of casualties treated at the closest hospital. Crit Care. 2005;9(1):104-111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Darley, DS, Kellman, RM. Otologic considerations of blast injury. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010;4(2):145-152.Google Scholar
8. Yasin, MM, Nasreen, G, Malik, SA. Injury pattern of suicide bomb attacks in Pakistan. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012;38(2):119-127.Google Scholar