Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:22:35.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) Planning for the USA: A Unique Opportunity for the Peaceful use of Military Assets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Martin E. Silverstein
Affiliation:
Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, 1800 K Street, Washington, DC, 20006, USA.

Extract

Magnitude and Configuration of Disasters. The increasing number of disasters and consequent casualties in an era of growing sophistication of care for the emergency patient mandates a systematized disaster response utilizing all of a nation's resources in optimum fashion. Life in the second half of this century has grown more complicated and in so doing has laid the basis for more complex disasters. Larger groups of people are vulnerable to individual catastrophic events. Population increases and sociopolitical alterations have accelerated the trend toward the establishment of residential and industrial centers in areas subject to natural disasters. Societal and political pressures are increasing tensions, producing ever more disasters along a broad spectrum, ranging from isolated terrorist events through low intensity conflict to limited conventional warfare. Perhaps most important, our increasingly technological society has not only contributed significantly to the menu of conflicts but has brought a variety of new transportation and industrial hazards to the ordinary course of life.

Type
Section Three—Military Contributions to Disaster Medicine
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)Beary, JF. Nat. Disaster Med. System. Proc. Annual Mtg. Comm. on Trauma, American College of Surgeons, San Antonio, TX, March, 1983. Amer. Coll. Surgeons: 55 E. Erie Street, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
(2)Bill, A. Practical help — the Swiss way: A profile of the Swiss disaster relief unit. Lecture for the UN Disaster Relief Organization, 1981. UNDRO: Palais de Nacions, CH-1222 Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
(3)Bisgard, JC. The obligation to care for casualties. Hastings Center Report, April 1982. DOD, see (4).Google Scholar
(4)Duffy, J. The National Disaster Medical System Captain. Proc. Fed. Symp. “Role of the Health Professional in Med. Readiness,” Naval Postgrad. School, Monterey, CA, July, 1983. Dept. of Defense, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301.Google Scholar
(5)Guiffreda, LO. FEMA mission. Proc. Ann. Mtg. Comm. Trauma, Amer. Coll. Surgeons, San Antonio, TX, March 1983. Federal Emerg. Management Agency, L'Enfant Plaza, 500 C SW, Washington, DC 20024.Google Scholar
(6)Naggan, L. Medical planning for disaster in Israel. Injury 7:279285, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Nomberg, M. In Israel, organizing the Operating Room for mass casualties. Amer. Oper. Room Nurses J., 33:981, 1981.Google ScholarPubMed
(8)Piroue, PA. Civil defense in Switzerland. Fed, Ofc. Civil Defense, Bern, Jan. 1982.Google Scholar
(9)Silverstein, ME. The relationship between the Civilian-Military Contingency Hospital System and the National Disaster Medical System. Proc. Fed. Symp. “Role of the Health Professional in Medical Readiness,” Naval Postgrad. School, Monterey, CA, 3uly 1983, DOD, see (4).Google Scholar
(10)Silverstein, ME. Triage decision trees, etc: Changing strategies for medical rescue in civilian mass casualty situations. Report for Fed. Emergency Management Agency Contract EMW-C-1202, March 1984. FEMA, see (5).Google Scholar