Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:57:42.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Military-Civic Action and the 4th Geneva Convention: Lessons Learned or Ignored?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Frederick M. Burkle Jr.
Frederick M. Burkle Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Sciences and Epidemiology, Director, AsiaPacific Center for Biosecurity, Disaster and Conflict Research, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Review
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , June 2006 , pp. 139 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Malish, R. Scott, JS, Rasheed, BO: Military-civic action: Lessons learned from a brigade-level aid project in the 2003 war with Iraq. Prehosp Disast Med 2006;21(3)135–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Martone, G: Guidelines for Interacting with Military and Belligerant Parties. International Rescue Committee, New York. 09 April 2003: 1–8.Google Scholar
3. Fourth Geneva Conventions: Articles 55 & 56. International Committee Of the Red Cross, Geneva, 1949.Google Scholar
4. The Sphere Project: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response. Oxfam Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2004 Edition.Google Scholar
5. Boot, M: The struggle to transform the military. Foreign Affairs 2005; March/April:103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar