Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:33:33.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mass-Casualty Training Exercise Using High-Fidelity Computerized Simulators and Involving Time and Resource Limitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2021

Phillip A. Jacobson Open the ORCID record for Phillip A. Jacobson [Opens in a new window] ,
Paul N. Severin ,
Dino P. Rumoro  and
Shital Shah
Phillip A. Jacobson*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Section of Critical Care, Rush University Medical Center and John H. Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IllinoisUSA
Paul N. Severin
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Section of Critical Care, Rush University Medical Center and John H. Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IllinoisUSA
Dino P. Rumoro
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IllinoisUSA
Shital Shah
Affiliation:
Department of Health Systems Management, Rush University and Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IllinoisUSA
*
Correspondence: Phillip Jacobson, MD, 9419 Hamlin Ave, Evanston, Illinois60203USA, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Purpose:

Training emergency department (ED) personnel in the care of victims of mass-casualty incidents (MCIs) is a highly challenging task requiring unique and innovative approaches. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively explore the value of high-fidelity simulators in an exercise that incorporates time and resource limitation as an optimal method of training health care personnel in mass-casualty care.

Methods:

Mass-casualty injury patterns from an explosive blast event were simulated for 12 victims using high-fidelity computerized simulators (HFCS). Programmed outcomes, based on the nature of injuries and conduct of participants, ranged from successful resuscitation and survival to death. The training exercise was conducted five times with different teams of health care personnel (n = 42). The exercise involved limited time and resources such as blood, ventilators, and imaging capability. Medical team performance was observed and recorded. Following the exercise, participants completed a survey regarding their training satisfaction, quality of the exercise, and their prior experiences with MCI simulations. The Likert scale responses from the survey were evaluated using mean with 95% confidence interval, as well as median and inter-quartile range. For the categorical responses, the frequency, proportions, and associated 95% confidence interval were calculated.

Results:

The mean rating on the quality of experiences related trainee survey questions (n = 42) was between 4.1 and 4.6 on a scale of 5.0. The mean ratings on a scale of 10.0 for quality, usefulness, and pertinence of the program were 9.2, 9.5, and 9.5, respectfully. One hundred percent of respondents believed that this type of exercise should be required for MCI training and would recommend this exercise to colleagues. The five medical team (n = 5) performances resulted in the number of deaths ranging from two (including the expectant victims) to six. Eighty percent of medical teams attempted to resuscitate the “expectant” infant and exhausted the O- blood supply. Sixty percent of medical teams depleted the supply of ventilators. Forty percent of medical teams treated “delayed” victims too early.

Conclusion:

A training exercise using HFCS for mass casualties and employing limited time and resources is described. This exercise is a preferred method of training among participating health care personnel.

Keywords

high fidelitymass casualtysimulation
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 2021 , pp. 313 - 320
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Altered Standards of Care in Mass Casualty Events. Washington, DC USA: Department of Health and Human Services. AHRQ Publication No. 05-0048; April 2005.Google Scholar
IOM (Institute of Medicine). Emergency Medical Services: At the Crossroads. Washington, DC USA: The National Academies Press; 2006.Google Scholar
Subbarao, I, Lyznicki, JM, Hsu, EB, et al. A consensus based educational framework and competency set for the discipline of disaster medicine and public health preparedness. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(1):57–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenig, K, Lim, HCS, Tsai, SH. Crisis standard of care: refocusing health care goals during catastrophic disasters and emergencies. J Experimental & Clinical Med. 2011;3(4):159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homeland Security Council. National Strategy for Homeland Security. https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/nat_strat_homelandsecurity_2007.pdf. Accessed 2020.Google Scholar
Krohmer, JR, Bern, AI. Moulage in a disaster simulation exercise. Ann Emerg Med. 1985;14(10):1032–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hack, VI. Simulation of Military Casualties. JAMA. 1959;171(2):193–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burstein, JL. The myths of disaster education. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47(1):50–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brehm, G. Simulation in disaster drills. The EMT Journal. 1978;2(1):70.Google ScholarPubMed
Ballow, S, Behar, S, Claudius, I, et al. Hospital based disaster preparedness for pediatric. Am J Disaster Med. 2008;3(3):171–180.Google ScholarPubMed
Andreatta, PB, Maslowski, E, Petty, S, et al. Virtual reality triage training provides a viable solution for disaster-preparedness. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(8):870–876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, L, Shapiro, M, Sumer, S, et al. Disaster medicine: the potential role of high-fidelity medical simulation for mass casualty incident training. Med Health RI. 2003;86(7):196–200.Google ScholarPubMed
Vincent, DS, Berg, BW, Ikegami, K. Mass casualty triage training for international healthcare workers in the Asia Pacific region using manikin-based simulations. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(3):206–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leikin, S, Aitchison, P, Pettineo, M, et al. Simulation applications in emergency medical services. Disease-a-Month. 2011;57(11):723–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillett, B, Peckler, B, Sinert, R, et al. Simulation in a disaster drill: comparison of high-fidelity simulators versus trained actors. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):1144–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services. Chemical Hazards Emergency Medical Management (CHEMM). START Adult Triage Algorithm. https://chemm.nlm.nih.gov/startadult.htm. Accessed June 14, 2020.Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services. Chemical Hazards Emergency Medical Management (CHEMM). JumpSTART Pediatric Triage Algorithm. https://chemm.nlm.nih.gov/startpediatric.htm. Accessed June 14, 2020.Google Scholar
Ronig, LE. Pediatric triage. A system to JumpSTART your triage of young patients at MCIs. JEMS. 2002;27(7):52–58; 60-63.Google Scholar
Reznek, M, Harter, P, Krummel, T. Virtual reality and simulation. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(1):78–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bond, WF, Lammers, RL, Spillane, LL, et al. The use of simulation in emergency medicine: a research agenda. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(4):353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, DA, Chan, EW, Pillemer, F, et al. Assessing and improving hospital mass-casualty preparedness: a no-notice exercise. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(6):662–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine (IOM). Crisis Standards of Care: A Toolkit for Indications and Triggers. Washington, DC USA: The National Academies Press; 2013.Google Scholar
Emanuel, E, Persad, G, Upsur, R, et al. Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(21):2049–2055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. Rational use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Interim Guidance March 19, 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331498/WHO-2019-nCoV-IPCPPE_use-2020.2-eng.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2020.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, L, Shapiro, MJ, Gutma, DC, et al. Multiple encounter simulation for high-acuity multi-patient environment training. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(12):1141–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halamek, L. Teaching versus learning and the role of simulation-based training in Pediatrics. J Pediatr. 2007;151(4):329–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franc-Law, JM, Ingrassia, PL, Ragazzoni, L, et al. The effectiveness of training with an emergency department simulator on medical student performance in a simulated disaster. Can J Emerg Med. 2010;12(1):27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atlas, RM, Clover, RD, Carrico, R, et al. Recognizing biothreat diseases: realistic training using standardized patients and patient simulators. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2005;Suppl:s143-146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, D, Gillett, B, Wright, B, et al. Randomized controlled trial of high-fidelity patient simulators compared to actor patients in a pandemic influenza drill scenario. Resuscitation. 2010;81(7):872–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Jacobson et al. supplementary material

Appendix 1

Download Jacobson et al. supplementary material(File)
File 7.7 MB