Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:21:28.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Level of Disaster Preparedness in Patients Visiting the Emergency Department: Results of the Civilian Assessment of Readiness for Disaster (CARD) Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2013

Nicholas A. True*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA
Juliana D. Adedoyin
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA
Frances S. Shofer
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA
Eddie K. Hasty
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA
Jane H. Brice
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA
*
Correspondence: Nicholas A. True Department of Emergency Medicine University of North Carolina CB# 7594 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7594 USA E-mail [email protected]

Abstract

Background

Patients seeking care in public hospitals are often resource-limited populations who have in past disasters become the most vulnerable. The objective of this study was to determine the personal disaster preparedness of emergency department (ED) patients and to identify predictors of low levels of preparedness. It was hypothesized that vulnerable populations would be better prepared for disasters.

Methods

A prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted over a one-year period of patients seeking care in a public university hospital ED (census 65,000). Exclusion criteria were mentally impaired, institutionalized, or non-English speaking subjects. Subjects completed an anonymous survey detailing the 15 personal preparedness items from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's disaster preparedness checklist as well as demographic characteristics. Summary statistics were used to describe general preparedness. Chi-square tests were used to compare preparedness by demographics.

Results

During the study period, 857/1000 subjects completed the survey. Participants were predominantly male (57%), Caucasian (65%), middle-aged (mean 45 years), and high school graduates (83%). Seventeen percent (n = 146) reported having special needs and 8% were single parents. Most participants were not prepared: 451 (53%) had >75% of checklist items, 393 (46%) had food and water for 3 days, and 318 (37%) had food, water, and >75% of items. Level of preparedness was associated with age and parenting. Those aged 44 and older were more likely to be prepared for a disaster compared to younger respondents. (43.3% vs 31.1%, P = .0002). Similarly, single parents were more likely to be prepared than dual parenting households (47.1 vs 32.9%, P = .03).

Conclusions

This study and others have found that only the minority of any group is actually prepared for disaster. Future research should focus on ways to implement disaster preparedness education, specifically targeting vulnerable populations, then measuring the effects of educational programs to demonstrate that preparedness has increased as a result.

TrueNA, AdedoyinJD, ShoferFS, HastyEK, BriceJH. Level of Disaster Preparedness in Patients Visiting the Emergency Department: Results of the Civilian Assessment of Readiness for Disaster (CARD) Survey. Prehosp Disaster Med.2013;28(2):1-5.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.About the Ready Campaign. The Ready Campaign/FEMA website. http://www.ready.gov/about-us. Accessed April 29, 2012.Google Scholar
2.American Public Health Association. National Opinion Survey to Determine Levels of Preparedness for a Public Health Crisis. http://safezonellc.com/documents/Survey_Report.pdf. Published 2007. Accessed April 29, 2012.Google Scholar
3.Citizen Corps. Are We Ready? Introducing the Public Readiness Index: A Survey-Based Tool to Measure the Preparedness of Individuals. http://citizencorps.gov/downloads/pdf/ready/pri_report.pdf. Published 2006. Accessed April 29, 2012.Google Scholar
4.Citizen Corps. Personal Preparedness in America: Findings from the 2009 Citizen Corps Survey. http://www.citizencorps.gov/downloads/pdf/ready/2009_Citizen_Corps_National_Survey_Findings.pdf. Published 2009. Accessed April 29, 2012.Google Scholar
5.Wingate, MS, et al. Indentifying and protecting vulnerable populations in public health emergencies: addressing gaps in education and training. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(3):422-426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Urban Institute. Emergency Department Visits in Massachusetts: Who Uses Emergency Care and Why? http://www.rwjf.org/files/research/48929.pdf. Published 2009. Accessed April 29, 2012.Google Scholar
7.Baker, LR, Baker, MD. Disaster preparedness among families of children with special health care needs. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010;4(3):240-245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Barata, I, Llovera, I, et al. Disaster preparedness in a New York community after 9/11. The Internet Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2007;3(2).Google Scholar
9.Zils, SW, Lerner, EB, Pirrallo, R. Milwaukee Are You Ready? Personal Disaster Preparedness Among Emergency Department Patients. Poster presented at: NAEMSP 2009 Annual Meeting; January 22-24, 2009; Jacksonville, Florida USA.Google Scholar
10.Basic Preparedness. The FEMA Web site. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/areyouready/basic_preparedness.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2012.Google Scholar
11.Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. http://blogs.cdc.gov/publichealthmatters/2011/05/preparedness-101-zombie-apocalypse/. Accessed April 29, 2012.Google Scholar