Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:30:52.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lessons from a DC10 Crash, American Airlines, Flight 191, Chicago, Illinois

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2017

Frank J. Baker II, M.D.
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Chicago Hospitals and Clinics, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Jacek B. Franaszek
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Chicago Hospitals and Clinics, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Extract

With the development and deployment of commercial jet aircraft in the mid 1950's, airline travel has become commonplace throughout the world. A rapid increase in the numbers of aircraft, airline routes, and flying time has occurred. New technology has added sophisticated and complicated gear to aircraft and their support systems. Every new system has the potential for failure and to some extent additional components increase the risk of technological breakdown. The increased chance of technological breakdown favors an increase in aircraft accidents. Fortunately, development and utilization of sophisticated redundant electronic and mechanical improvements aimed specifically at improving safety have also occurred. The results of these changes over the past twenty-five years has been a decreasing rate of accidents per mile flown. Due to the tremendous increase in flying, however, the absolute numbers of accidents associated passenger morbidity and mortality have risen (1). For the health care system, the major impact has resulted from the absolute increase in aircrash victims.

Aircraft accidents have regularly produced mass casualty incidents with the number of victims ranging from a few to several hundred. Aircraft accidents can be divided into essentially four types: mid-air crashes (so called “hard impact”); crashes on takeoff; crashes on landing; and on-ground accidents (“soft impact”). Mid-air accidents are frequently away from population centers and usually there are no survivors. The medical impact therefore is minimal. Accidents occurring on takeoff, landing, and on the ground, occur at or close to airports, and the nature of the accident is such that there may be many victims (1).

Type
Section Four—Reports of Actual Air Disasters
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wurster, JF. Causes and nature of injuries in air accidents. In Disaster Medicine: Types and Events of Disasters, Organization in Various Disaster Situations. Frey, R, Safar, P (eds). New York:Springer-Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar
2 Baker, FJ. Hospital physician's role in disaster planning and in management of the disaster site: The city of Chicago disaster plan. In Disaster Medicine: Types and Events of Disasters, Organization in Various Disaster Situations. Frey, R, Safar, P (eds). New York:Springer-Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar
3 Owens, JC. Emergency health services require efficient communications systems. JAMA, June 1969.Google Scholar
4Statistics, Chicago Hospital Council Official Disaster Critique Records.Google Scholar
5 Mesnick, PS. Value of disaster critiques as demonstrated by the management of two “l” crashes in the city of Chicago. Disaster Medicine: Types and Events of Disasters, Organization in Various Disaster Situations. Frey, R, Safar, P (eds). New York:Springer-Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar
6 Hollo way, RM. Medical disaster planning: Urban areas. NYJ Med, March 1971.Google Scholar
7 Conrad, MB, Klippel, AP. Disaster planning in a metropolitan area. Bull Am Coll Surg, May 1972.Google Scholar