Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:08:37.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

JumpSTART Triage Protocol in Disaster Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Literature Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2022

Giovanna M. Stéfani ,
Murilo E. de Melo ,
Heloísa N. Zardeto ,
Victor S. L. P. Costa ,
Fabiana S. Lima  and
Maíra Cola Open the ORCID record for Maíra Cola [Opens in a new window]
Giovanna M. Stéfani
Affiliation:
Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Department of Health Sciences, Campus Araranguá, Araranguá, Brazil
Murilo E. de Melo
Affiliation:
Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Department of Health Sciences, Campus Araranguá, Araranguá, Brazil
Heloísa N. Zardeto
Affiliation:
Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Department of Health Sciences, Campus Araranguá, Araranguá, Brazil
Victor S. L. P. Costa
Affiliation:
Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Department of Health Sciences, Campus Araranguá, Araranguá, Brazil
Fabiana S. Lima
Affiliation:
Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Postgraduate Program in Information and Communication Technologies, Campus Araranguá, Araranguá, Brazil
Maíra Cola*
Affiliation:
Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Department of Health Sciences, Campus Araranguá, Araranguá, Brazil
*
Correspondence: Maíra Cola, PhD Department of Health Sciences, Campus Araranguá Gov. Jorge Lacerda Rode, Km 35.4 Jardim das Avenidas Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) 88905-355, Araranguá, SC, Brazil E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

In a mass-casualty incident (MCI) involving children, there is a need to apply accurate triage tools in order to help those who require important care, and at the same time, to avoid unnecessary use of resources. Thus, it is discussed which would be the best triage device to use in these situations. One of the most used is a modification of Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment, JumpSTART, whose performative quality this review focuses on.

Study Objective:

This review sought to compare the performance parameters of JumpSTART with other triage algorithms used in pediatric disaster victims.

Methods:

This systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and registered with the PROSPERO database of systematic reviews with the number CRD42021258415. The last update of the search in the databases was on August 12, 2021 and resulted in six documents to be analyzed. The inclusion criteria included the peer-reviewed academic papers in English, Portuguese, Spanish, and Italian languages, and the databases used were PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE/Bireme (Virtual Library of Health), Web of Science, and CINAHL, which executes the query on the topic, keywords, or abstracts. Also to be included, documents that were available with full-text access through CAPES, Google, or Google Scholar. Books, non-academic research, and content in languages other than the presented ones were represented as exclusion criteria. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists were used to evaluate the methodological quality of the retrieved studies. The results were presented through narrative synthesis. This review was not funded.

Results:

Of the collected publications, five articles were used to carry out this review, with the addition of an extra article captured by citation tracking. The findings from the obtained results were that JumpSTART was the preferred tool and presented the fastest speed of use. Only one of the five studies that dealt with accuracy showed JumpSTART as the most accurate algorithm, while three of the other four showed its inferiority in most aspects. In one study, no significant difference was observed amongst the chosen protocols.

Conclusions:

There is insufficient evidence to validate JumpSTART as a universal triage tool, given the disparities in the results obtained from the comparisons. No tool performed satisfactorily well, therefore there is an urgent need to create a reliable algorithm.

Keywords

childdisasterEmergency MedicineJumpSTARTpediatric
Type
Systematic Review
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 240 - 246
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cicero, MX, Overly, F, Brown, L, et al. Comparing the accuracy of three pediatric disaster triage strategies: a simulation-based investigation. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(2):253–260.10.1017/dmp.2015.171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, N, White, ML, Tofil, N, et al. Randomized trial comparing two mass casualty triage systems (JumpSTART versus SALT) in a pediatric simulated mass casualty event. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014;18(3):417–423.10.3109/10903127.2014.882997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, LA, Carley, S. Comparison of pediatric major incident primary triage tools. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(6):475–478.10.1136/emj.2005.032672CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dziuban, E, Peacock, G, Frogel, M. A child’s health is the public’s health: progress and gaps in addressing pediatric needs in public health emergencies. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(S2):S134–137.10.2105/AJPH.2017.303950CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyle, K, Thompson, T, Graham, J. Pediatric mass casualty: triage and planning for the prehospital provider. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med. 2009;10:173–185.10.1016/j.cpem.2009.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, JM, Wei, G, Donovan, CM, et al. Medical management at the explosive incident scene. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69(1S):S20–28.10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.09.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadeau, NL, Cicero, MX. Pediatric disaster triage system utilization across the United States. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017;33(3):152–155.10.1097/PEC.0000000000000680CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cone, DC, MacMillan, DS. Mass-casualty triage systems: a hint of science. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(8):739–741.10.1197/j.aem.2005.04.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt, PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372.Google Scholar
The Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2014 edition. JBI. 2014. http://joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/sumari/ReviewersManual-2014.pdf. Accessed July 5, 2021.Google Scholar
Azevedo, YJ de, Ledesma, ALL, Pereira, LV, Oliveira, CA, Bahmad Junior, F. Vestibular implant: does it really work? A systematic review. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;85(6):788–798.10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.07.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, CL, Brace-Mcdonnell, SJ, Stallard, N, Bleetman, A, Maconochie, I, Perkins, GD. Performance characteristics of five triage tools for major incidents involving traumatic injuries to children. Injury. 2016;47(5):988–992.10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.076CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heffernan, RW, Lerner, EB, McKee, CH, et al. Comparing the accuracy of mass casualty triage systems in a pediatric population. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019;23(3):304–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Surgeons. Resources for optimal care of the injured patient. American College of Surgeons, Committee on Trauma. 2014. https://idph.iowa.gov/Portals/1/userfiles/186/Resources_for_Optimal_Care_of_the_Injured_Patient.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2021.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57(1).Google Scholar
Jenkins, JL, McCarthy, ML, Sauer, LM, et al. Mass-casualty triage: time for an evidence-based approach. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(1):3–8.10.1017/S1049023X00005471CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner, EB, Schwartz, RB, Coule, PL, et al. Mass casualty triage: an evaluation of the data and development of a proposed national guideline. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2 Suppl 1:S25–34.10.1097/DMP.0b013e318182194eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Stéfani et al. supplementary material

Stéfani et al. supplementary material 1

Download Stéfani et al. supplementary material(File)
File 32.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Stéfani et al. supplementary material

Stéfani et al. supplementary material 2

Download Stéfani et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16.9 KB