Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T18:40:52.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International Guidelines and Standards for Education and Training to Reduce the Consequences of Events that May Threaten the Health Status of a Community – A Report of an Open International WADEM Meeting, Brussels, Belgium, 29-31 October 2004

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Frank Archer*
Affiliation:
Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Geert Seynaeve
Affiliation:
Chief Medical Officer, Emergency Medical Services, Ministry of Health, Belgium
*
Geert Seynaeve Huart-Hamoirlaan 681030 Brussels, Belgium E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The continued professionalization of the humanitarian workforce requires sound underpinning by appropriate educational programs.The international disaster medicine and emergency health community requested the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine (WADEM) develop international standards and guidelines for the education and training for disaster medicine. The Working Group of the WADEM Education Committee prepared and circulated an Issues Paper to structure input on this significant international task. Subsequently, the Working Group facilitated an Open International Meeting convened in Brussels, Belgium, 2004. The “Issues Paper” also was used as a framework to structure this International Meeting, which utilized case studies selected to represent the scope of disaster medicine, and prepared a meeting consensus on a framework for disaster health and for related educational programs.

The two-day Brussels meeting attracted 51 participants from 19 countries, representing 21 disciplines.Participants reinforced the need to address the development of international standards and guidelines on education and training in this emerging discipline.Participants supported the view that the term “Disaster Health” suggested a multidisciplinary approach that is a more inclusive contemporary and appropriate term to describe this field, although there were dissenting views.

The meeting formulated a consensus view in support of a framework for “Disaster Health”, which included: (1) primary disciplines; (2) support disciplines; (3) community response, resilience, and communication; and (4) socio-political context. The participants considered that this model lends itself to facilitating the development of educational programs in this field and believed that standards and guidelines initially should be developed in the “Core of Disaster Health” for undergraduates in relevant professions, for practicing professionals wishing to expand their practice in this field, and in the “Breadth of Disaster Health” for those wishing to be recognized as “Disaster Health Specialists” as academics, professionals, or policy leaders in this field at a University multidisciplinary Masters Degree level. A community-level and higher-specialist doctoral level would follow.

Although the view of the participants was that the establishment of international approval/endorsement processes for education programs may have some benefits, there was less comfort in identifying which body/agency should be charged with this responsibility. The WADEM, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, and the World Health Organization were identified as potential lead agents.

The outcome of this international meeting is an important step toward meeting the challenge given the WADEM and will be developed further in consultation with the international disaster and emergency health community in order to improve education and training standards and professional practice.

Type
Special Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

On behalf of the WADEM Education Committee Working Group members:

Dr. Geert Seynaeve (Belgium)-Convenor

A/Prof. Frank Archer, (Australia)

Dr. Judith Fisher (UK/USA)

A/Prof Brigitte Lueger-Schuster (Austria)

Dr. Alison Rowlands (UK)

Mr. Phillip Sellwood (UK)

Dr. Karel Vandevelde (Belgium)

Dr. Anastasia Zigoura (Greece)

References

1. Issues Paper, 30 July 2004 (long version). Available at http://wadem.medicine. wisc.edu. Accessed 27 April 2007.Google Scholar
2. Issues Paper, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine (V19,N2) (short version). Available at http://wadem.medicine.wisc.edu. Accessed 27 April 2007.Google Scholar
3. Dr Anastasia Zigoura, Athens 1999 Earthquake – In the Framework of the Conceptual Model for “Disaster Medicine”. Paper presented at the Open International WADEM Meeting, Brussels, Belgium, 29–31 October, 2004.Google Scholar
4. Dr Nicholas Petropoulos, Athens 1999 Earthquake – A Follow-up Study from the Sociological Perspective. Paper presented at the Open International WADEM Meeting, Brussels, Belgium, 29–31 October, 2004.Google Scholar
5. Dr Judith Fisher, Mass Gatherings. Paper presented at the Open International WADEM Meeting, Brussels, Belgium, 29–31 October, 2004.Google Scholar
6. Dr Ignace Demeyer, Technological Disasters—Fire.Paper presented at the Open International WADEM Meeting, Brussels, Belgium, 29–31 October, 2004.Google Scholar
7. Mr John Colman, Health Emergency Planning in New Zealand. Paper presented at the Open International WADEM Meeting, Brussels, Belgium, 29–31 October, 2004.Google Scholar
8. Prof Dr Christine Rodrique, Hazard Vulnerability, Media Construction of Disaster and Risk Management (Word). Paper presented at the Open International WADEM Meeting, Brussels, Belgium, 29–31 October, 2004.Google Scholar
9. Prof Dr Christine Rodrique, Hazard Vulnerability, Media Construction of Disaster and Risk Management (Powerpoint). Paper presented at the Open International WADEM Meeting, Brussels, Belgium, 29–31 October, 2004.Google Scholar
10. Dr Claude de Ville de Goyet, Natural Disasters in Developing Countries. Paper presented at the Open International WADEM Meeting, Brussels, Belgium, 29–31 October, 2004. Paper presented at the Open International WADEM Meeting, Brussels, Belgium, 29–31 October, 2004.Google Scholar
11. Dr Claude de Ville de Goyet, Contribution to the White Paper: Public Health and Disaster Management.Paper presented at the Open International WADEM Meeting, Brussels, Belgium, 29–31 October, 2004.Google Scholar
12. Dr Claude de Ville de Goyet, Stop Propogating Disaster Myths, The Lancet 2000;356: 762764.Google Scholar
13. “Final Report of the Blue Ribbon Task Force” prepared by the Accrediting Commission on Education for Health Services Administration (ACEHSA) and the National Centre for Healthcare Leadership (NCHL). Also available at http://www.asph.org. Accessed 31 October 2004.Google Scholar
15. Prof David Alexander, “Towards the Generation of Standards in Civil Protection”.Google Scholar
16. Prof David Alexander, “The Structure of Training Courses in Disaster Management”.Google Scholar
17. “Accreditation Framework” developed by the Association of Schools of Public Health in the European Region(ASPHER) Also available at http://www.aspher.org. Accessed 31 October 2004.Google Scholar
18. Prof David, Alexander, “Towards the Development of Standards in Emergency Management Training and Education, Disaster Prevention and Management 2003;12 (2):113123.Google Scholar
19. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. Available at http://www.cred.beGoogle Scholar
20. World Disasters Reports. Available at http://www.ifrc.org/publications.Google Scholar
21. Melbourne Statement, WCDEM-13. Prehosp Disast Med 2003;18(3):162163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Arnold, J: Risks and Risk Assessment in Health Emergency Management, Prehosp Disast Med 2005;20(3):143154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. WADEM, MelborneGoogle Scholar
24. Murray, V, Clifford, J, Seynaeve, G, Fisher, J, Disaster Health Education and Training: A Pilot Questionnaire to Understand Current Status. Prehosp Disast Med 2006;21(3):156167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed