Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:23:18.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of the 2007 Ica Earthquake on Health Facilities and Health Service Provision in Southern Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Erica Chapin
Affiliation:
1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Amy Daniels
Affiliation:
1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Rosa Elias
Affiliation:
1Instituto Peruano de Paternidad Responsable, Lima, Lima Province Peru
Daniel Aspilcueta
Affiliation:
1Instituto Peruano de Paternidad Responsable, Lima, Lima Province Peru
Shannon Doocy*
Affiliation:
1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland USA
*
Department of International HealthJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthSuite E8132615 North Wolfe StreetBaltimore, Maryland 21205 USA E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

Few studies have examined post-disaster coping abilities of health facilities and hospitals. On 15 August 2007, a 7.9 (Richter) earthquake struck off the western coast of Peru near the Department of Ica that devastated the healthcare infrastructure. The impact of the earthquake on the health facilities in the four most affected provinces (Cañete, Chincha, Ica, and Pisco), the risk factors associated with the damages incurred, ability to provide services, and humanitarian assistance received were assessed.

Methods:

A stratified, systematic sampling design was used to interview a sample of 40 health facilities. The most senior healthcare provider at each facility was interviewed about the facility's experience with service provision following the earthquake.

Results:

Sixty percent of the facilities reported some damage due to the earthquake; four (10%) were completely destroyed. A total of 78% of the facilities reported providing medical care within the first 48 hours after the earthquake and public facilities were more likely to remain open than were private facilities (p = 0.030). Facilities with an emergency response plan were more likely to provide services than were those without a plan (p = 0.043). Six months after the earthquake, similar numbers of HIV and tuberculosis (TB) patients were receiving treatment at the sampled facilities as prior to the earthquake, and no difficulties were reported in obtaining medications. Some form of assistance, most commonly medications, was received by 60% of the facilities; receipt of assistance was not associated with the facility type, location, damage incurred, or post-disaster service provision.

Conclusions:

Response plans were an important factor in the ability to provide services immediately following an earthquake. While a facility's ability to provide services can be determined by structural impacts of the precipitating event, response plans help the staff to continue to provide services and care for affected populations, and appropriately arrange referrals when care cannot be provided at the facility. The findings suggest that health facilities in disasterprone areas should invest in developing and implementing disaster response plans in order to improve health service provision capacity during disasters.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Chan, YF, Alagappan, K, Gandhi, A, Donovan, C., Tewari, M, Zaets, SB: Disaster management following the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan. Prehosp Disaster Med 2006;21(3):196202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Kako, Y: Lessons from Hanshin Awaji earthquake–Experience of a medical association. Jpn Med Assoc J 2005;48(7):327333.Google Scholar
3Niwayama, M: Lessons from the Niigata Chuetsu earthquake in Japan–Experience of a small medical association in hilly and mountainous areas. Jpn Med Assoc J 2005;48(7):334340.Google Scholar
4Peltz, R, Ashkenazi, I, Schwartz, D, Shushan, O, Nakash, G, Leiba, A, Levi, Y, Goldberg, A, Bar-Dayan, Y: Disaster healthcare system management and crisis intervention leadership in Thailand—Lessons learned from the 2004 tsunami disaster. Prehosp Disaster Med 2006;21(5):299302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Yamauchi, K, Mizuno, S, Xu, Z: Disaster-readiness of medical facilities in Aichi Prefecture. Nagoya J Med Sci 1996;59:121128.Google ScholarPubMed
6United Nations Office of the Resident Coordinator: Situation Report No. 21: Earthquake in Peru, 1–6; September 28, 2007. Available at http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900sid/YSAR-77KSEH?OpenDocument&query=peru%202007%20earthquake. Accessed 23 April 2008.Google Scholar
7INEI: The Peruvian Census, 2005. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica e Informacion (INEI) Available at www.inei.gob.pe/inicio.htm. Accessed 11 November 2007.Google Scholar
8United Nations (UN): Consolidated Appeals Process: Peru Earthquake Flash Appeal. Available at http://ochaonline.un.org/humanitarianappeal/web-page.asp?Site=2007&Lang=en. Accessed 23 October 2007.Google Scholar
9Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), World Health Organization (WHO): Earthquake in Peru. Available at http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900sid/KHII78Z9XA?OpenDocument&rc=2&emid=EQ-2007-000133-PER. Accessed 23 April 2008.Google Scholar
10Pan American Health Organization (PAHO): Earthquake in Peru. Disasters Preparedness and Mitigation in the Americas 2007;108:14.Google Scholar
11Pan American Health Organization: Terremoto en Peru: Informe de la situación de salud. Desastres e Asistencia Humanitaria. Available at http://www.paho.org/spanish/dd/ped/EQPeru_807SitrepSalud240807.htm. Accessed 23 April 2008.Google Scholar
12UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs:Peru:Earthquake OCHA Situation Report No. 14. Available at http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900sid/EGUA76SS7D?OpenDocument&rc=2&emid=EQ-2007-000133-PER. Accessed 23 April 2008.Google Scholar
13United States Geological Survey Earthquake Hazards Program (USGS): Historic worldwide earthquakes online database. Available at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/world/historical_country.php#peru Accesed 06 May 2008Google Scholar
14WHO Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Humanitarian Health Cluster: Pakistan Earthquake, October 2005 Consolidated Health Situation Bulletin #2. 27 October 2005. Available at http://www.who.int/hac/crises/international/pakistan_earthquake/Bulletin2.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2008.Google Scholar
15World Bank Turkey Country Office: Turkey: Marmara Earthquake assessment. Available at http://www.worldbank.org/html/extdr/extme/ma091499a.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2008.Google Scholar
16United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF): Crisis appeal earthquake in Bam, Iran. Available at http://www.unicef.org/emerg/files/Emergencies_Iran_Flash_Appeal_130104.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2008.Google Scholar
17Clark, RA, Mirabelli, R, Shafe, J, Broyles, S, Besch, L, Kissinger, P: The New Orleans HIV outpatient program experience with Hurrican Katrina. J La State Med Soc 2007;159(5):276281.Google Scholar
18(US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Tuberculosis control activities after Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2005. MMWR 2006;55(12):332335.Google Scholar
19PAHO: Hoy OPS inauguro modulo de hospitalizacion en el hospital “San Juan de Dios”de Pisco.June 8,2008. Available at http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/LRON-7FGCHA?OpenDocument. Accessed 11 June 2008.Google Scholar
20UN News Service: Expertos tecnicos de OPS y DIRESA Ica se reunen para presenter proyecto de rehabilitacion post terremoto. Available at http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/ASAZ-7F2C7J?OpenDocument. Accessed 11 June 2008.Google Scholar