Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:03:05.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hospital Disaster Management Simulation System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Lion Levi*
Affiliation:
The Trauma Research Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
David Bregman
Affiliation:
The Trauma Research Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel The School of Business AdministrationCollege of Management, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Hana Geva
Affiliation:
The Trauma Research Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
Moshe Revach
Affiliation:
The Trauma Research Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
*
Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel 31096, e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

Theoretically, simulation of disastrous situations has many advantages in that it prepares hospital staff to cope with the real scenario. It is a challenge to create the database and custom-making a friendly software while still keeping it representative of a real situation. This article describes experience with developing and implementing the use of simulation software as a drilling technique used by Israeli hospitals.

Methods:

The application was developed using SIMAN/ARENA software. Knowledge and a database for a basic multi-casalty incident (MCI) were developed in the pilot phase. It contains detailed description of the casualties which can be compared with the real hospital capabilities (staff and infrastructure). A consensus committe decided the crucial model issues and estaalished the thresholds for quality performance indicators. Interfaces to the each hospital's information management systems (IMS) were developed and the various output documents of each exercised step were updated. Before drilling, the hospital managerial staff received notice and had to prepare the data on the anticipated resources required The simulation staff, as well as representatives from the hospitals, then conducted the limited scale drill (LSD).

Results:

During the LSD, the trained hospital staff were given two types of input: 1) copies of reports on patients entering the stations and had to enter them into its IMS; and 2) timed telephone notifications of problems in each station. During a 90 minutes drill, there were about 15 timely reports and 20 telephone problems. The evaluation of the LSD were based mainly on the following: 1) observing the staff solving various problems; 2) constructing a detailed picture of the situation; and 3) measuring the effectiveness of the hospital IMS. The drill ended with a discussion. Lessons are drawn from each drill in order to find methods for optimizing the conduct of the hospital. An animation tool proved to be useful in describing bottle necks in emergency room, diagnostic department, and operating rooms.

Conclusion:

Simulation techniques and a preparatory limited scale drill have advantages in evaluating and improving preparedness of hospitals for managing an MCI before a full scale drill is carried out.

Type
Special Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. De Boer, J, Brismar, B, Eldar, R, Rutherford, WH: The medical severity index of disasters. J Emerg Med 1989;7:269273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Eldar, R, Adler, J: Pre-earthquake vulnerability. WADEM 1987;3(1):107115.Google Scholar
3. Nissan, S, Eldar, R: Organization of surgical care of mass casualties in civilian hospital. J Trauma 1971;11:974978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. American College of Emergency Physicians [ACEP]: Disaster medical planning and, 4-5 April 1992, Chicago IL.Google Scholar
5. Levi, L, Bregman, D, Geva, H, Revach, M: Does number of beds reflect the surgical capability of hospitals in wartime and disaster? The use of simulation technique at a national level. Prebospital and Disaster Medicine 1997;12:232236.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Waeckerle, JF: Disaster planning and response. N Eng J Med 1991;342:815821.Google Scholar
7. Geva, H, Bregman, D, Linn, S et al. : Knowledge and database on mass casualty situations for simulation models and expert systems. The 7th International World Conference on Emergency and Disaster Medicine, 12-17 May 1991, Montreal. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1991;6:S192. Abstract.Google Scholar
8. Cowan, MLCloutier, MG: Medical simulation for disaster casualty management training. J Trauma 1988;28:S178182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed