Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:00:51.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Geographic Simulation Model for the Treatment of Trauma Patients in Disasters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Brendan G. Carr ,
Lauren Walsh ,
Justin C. Williams ,
John P. Pryor  and
Charles C. Branas
Brendan G. Carr
Affiliation:
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DCUSA Thomas Jefferson University, School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaUSA
Lauren Walsh*
Affiliation:
GAP Solutions, Inc.; in support of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, US Department of Health and Human Services; Herndon, VirginiaUSA
Justin C. Williams
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Whiting School of Engineering, Baltimore, MarylandUSA
John P. Pryor
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaUSA
Charles C. Branas
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaUSA
*
Correspondence: Lauren Walsh, MPH Senior Policy Analyst GAP Solutions, Inc. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Though the US civilian trauma care system plays a critical role in disaster response, there is currently no systems-based strategy that enables hospital emergency management and local and regional emergency planners to quantify, and potentially prepare for, surges in trauma care demand that accompany mass-casualty disasters.

Objective

A proof-of-concept model that estimates the geographic distributions of patients, trauma center resource usage, and mortality rates for varying disaster sizes, in and around the 25 largest US cities, is presented. The model was designed to be scalable, and its inputs can be modified depending on the planning assumptions of different locales and for different types of mass-casualty events.

Methods

To demonstrate the model’s potential application to real-life planning scenarios, sample disaster responses for 25 major US cities were investigated using a hybrid of geographic information systems and dynamic simulation-optimization. In each city, a simulated, fast-onset disaster epicenter, such as might occur with a bombing, was located randomly within one mile of its population center. Patients then were assigned and transported, in simulation, via the new model to Level 1, 2, and 3 trauma centers, in and around each city, over a 48-hour period for disaster scenario sizes of 100, 500, 5000, and 10,000 casualties.

Results

Across all 25 cities, total mean mortality rates ranged from 26.3% in the smallest disaster scenario to 41.9% in the largest. Out-of-hospital mortality rates increased (from 21.3% to 38.5%) while in-hospital mortality rates decreased (from 5.0% to 3.4%) as disaster scenario sizes increased. The mean number of trauma centers involved ranged from 3.0 in the smallest disaster scenario to 63.4 in the largest. Cities that were less geographically isolated with more concentrated trauma centers in their surrounding regions had lower total and out-of-hospital mortality rates. The nine US cities listed as being the most likely targets of terrorist attacks involved, on average, more trauma centers and had lower mortality rates compared with the remaining 16 cities.

Conclusions

The disaster response simulation model discussed here may offer insights to emergency planners and health systems in more realistically planning for mass-casualty events. Longer wait and transport times needed to distribute high numbers of patients to distant trauma centers in fast-onset disasters may create predictable increases in mortality and trauma center resource consumption. The results of the modeled scenarios indicate the need for a systems-based approach to trauma care management during disasters, since the local trauma center network was often too small to provide adequate care for the projected patient surge. Simulation of out-of-hospital resources that might be called upon during disasters, as well as guidance in the appropriate execution of mutual aid agreements and prevention of over-response, could be of value to preparedness planners and emergency response leaders. Study assumptions and limitations are discussed.

CarrBG, WalshL, WilliamsJC, PryorJP, BranasCC. A Geographic Simulation Model for the Treatment of Trauma Patients in Disasters. Prehosp Disaster Med.2016;31(4):413–421.

Keywords

computer modelsdisaster planninghealth care systemsmass-casualty incidents
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , August 2016 , pp. 413 - 421
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. MacKenzie, EJ, Rivara, FP, Jurkovich, GJ, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):366-378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Mackenzie, EJ, Hoyt, DB, Sacra, JC, et al. A national inventory of hospital trauma centers. JAMA. 2003;289(12):1515-1522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Maningas, PA, Robison, M, Mallonee, S. The EMS response to the Oklahoma City bombing. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1997;12(2):80-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. McDougal, P. Trauma Center Nurses Role in Disaster Planning. Society of Trauma Nurses Position Statement. http://www.traumanurses.org/_resources/documents/news/legislature/ position_on_role_in_disaster_planning.pdf?phpMyAdmin=YUKhXpm3NuRfJ3YccE22H8dYHvf. Accessed December 1, 2015.Google Scholar
5. Cushman, JG, Pachter, HL, Beaton, HL. Two New York City hospitals’ surgical response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack in New York City. J Trauma. 2003;54(1):147-155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Greenberg, R. Boston Marathon Bombing Emphasizes Vital Role of Trauma Centers. Association of American Medical Colleges. https://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/ june2013/346228/trauma-centers.html. Accessed December 1, 2015.Google Scholar
7. Area Hospitals Treat Patients Following Deadly Train Derailment. CBS Philly New Report. May 13, 2015. http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2015/05/13/area-hospitals-treat-passengers-following-port-richmond-train-derailment/. Accessed December 1, 2015.Google Scholar
8. Fallows, J. Success without victory. A “containment” strategy for the age of terror. Atlantic Monthly. 2005;295(1):80-90.Google Scholar
9. Waxman, HA. Hospital emergency surge capacity: not ready for the “predictable surprise.” US House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. May 2008.Google Scholar
10. Lurie, N. From hospitals to health care coalitions: transforming health preparedness and response in our communities. US Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response Report on the Hospital Preparedness Program, 2009.Google Scholar
11. Mahoney, LE, Whiteside, DF, Belue, HE, Mortisugu, KP, Esch, VH. Disaster medical assistance teams. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16(3):354-358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Branas, CC, MacKenzie, EJ, Williams, JC, et al. Access to trauma centers in the United States. JAMA. 2005;293(21):2626-2633.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Kanter, RK. Regional variation in critical care evacuation needs for children after a mass-casualty incident. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6(2):146-149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Otsuka, N, Yamashita, A, Kimura, Y, et al. Experience of DMAT rescue activity by doctor-helicopter in Tohoku Area after the earthquake. Masui. 2012;61(7):771-774.Google ScholarPubMed
15. Cassell, EA, Dorioz, JM, Kort, RL, et al. Modeling phosphorus dynamics in ecosystems: mass balance and dynamic simulation approaches. J Environment Quality. 1998;27(2):293-298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Jaworski, NA, Groffman, PM, Keller, AA, Prager, JC. A watershed nitrogen and phosphorus balance: the upper Potomac River basin. Estuaries. 1992;15(1):83-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Lerner, EB, Cone, DC, Weinstein, ES, et al. Mass-casualty triage: an evaluation of the science and refinement of a national guideline. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(2):129-137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Pryor, JP. The 2001 World Trade Center disaster. Int J Disaster Med. 2003;1:1-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Rivara, FP, Nathens, AB, Jurkovich, GJ, Maier, RV. Do trauma centers have the capacity to respond to disasters? J Trauma. 2006;61(4):949-953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Macintyre, AG, Christopher, GW, Eitzen, E Jr, et al. Weapons of mass destruction events with contaminated casualties: effective planning for health care facilities. JAMA. 2000;283(2):242-249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Counterterrorism Threat Assessment and Warning Unit, Counterterrorism Division. Terrorism in the United States, 1999. 30 Years of Terrorism, A Special Retrospective. 2000 Federal Bureau of Investigation:1-61.Google Scholar
22. Prescott, JE. “Terrorism: EMS issues and management.” In: Schwartz GR, (ed). Principles and Practice of Emergency Medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA: Lea & Febinger; 1992: 3226-3234.Google Scholar
23. Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the US Health System. Hospital Based Emergency Care at the Breaking Point. Washington, DC USA: National Academy Press; 2006.Google Scholar
24. Frykberg, ER. Medical management of disasters and mass casualties from terrorist bombings: how can we cope? J Trauma. 2002;53(2):201-212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Anonymous. Prepared for the unthinkable: EDs respond to terrorist attacks. ED Management. 2001;13(11):121-123.Google Scholar
26. Leaning, J, Briggs, SM, Chen, L. Humanitarian Crises: The Medical and Public Health Response. Massachusetts USA: Harvard Press; 1999.Google Scholar
27. National Association of EMS Physicians. National Implementation of the Model Uniform Core Criteria for Mass Casualty Incident Triage. A Concept Paper for FICEMS Consideration. December 19, 2011. www.ems.gov/pdf/2011/December/10-MUCC_Options_Paper_Final.pdf. Accessed December 2012.Google Scholar
28. Baez, AA, Lane, PL, Sorondo, B, Nituica, C. Trauma triage criteria system compliance for victims of motor vehicle crashes. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2001;45:269-284.Google ScholarPubMed
29. Nathens, AB, Jurkovich, GJ, MacKenzie, EJ, Rivara, FP. A resource-based assessment of trauma care in the United States. J Trauma. 2004;56(1):173-178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Hogan, DE, Waeckerle, JF, Dire, DJ, Lillibridge, SR. Emergency department impact of the Oklahoma City terrorist bombing. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(2):160-167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Lennquist, S. The importance of maintaining simplicity in planning and preparation for major accidents and disasters. Int J Disaster Med. 2004;2:5-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. ReVelle, C, Whitlatch, E, Wright, J. Civil and Environmental Systems Engineering. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1997.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Carr supplementary material

Appendix

Download Carr supplementary material(File)
File 18.5 KB