Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:11:37.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Express Railway Disaster in Amagasaki: A Review of Urban Disaster Response Capacity in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Takashi Nagata
Affiliation:
Takemi Program in International Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Division of International Health and Humanitarian Programs Department of Emergency Medicine, NH-126D, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Stephanie N. Rosborough
Affiliation:
Division of International Health and Humanitarian Programs Department of Emergency Medicine, NH-126D, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Michael J. VanRooyen
Affiliation:
Division of International Health and Humanitarian Programs Department of Emergency Medicine, NH-126D, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Shuichi Kozawa
Affiliation:
Hyogo Emergency Medical Center, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Japan
Takashi Ukai
Affiliation:
Hyogo Emergency Medical Center, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Japan
Shinichi Nakayama*
Affiliation:
Hyogo Emergency Medical Center, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Japan
*
Shinichi Nakayama Hyogo Emergency Medical Center 1-3-1, Wakinohamakaigandori, Chuo-ku, Kobe 651-0073, Japan E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

On the morning of 25 April 2005, a Japan Railway express train derailed in an urban area of Amagasaki, Japan. The crash was Japan's worst rail disaster in 40 years.This study chroniclesthe rescue efforts and highlights the capacity of Japan's urban disaster response.

Methods:

Public reports were gathered from the media, Internet, government, fire department, and railway company. Four key informants, who were close to the disaster response, were interviewed to corroborate publicdata and highlight challenges facing the response.

Results:

The crash left 107 passengers dead and 549 injured. First responders, most of whom were volunteers, were helpful in the rescue effort, and no lives were lost due to transport delays or faulty triage. Responders criticized an early decision to withdraw rescue efforts, a delay in heliport set-up, the inefficiency of the information and instruction center, and emphasized the need for training in confined space medicine. Communication and chain-of-command problems created confusion at the scene.

Conclusions:

The urban disaster response to the train crash in Amagasaki was rapid and effective.The KobeEarthquake and other incidents sparked changes that improved disaster preparedness in Amagasaki. However, communication and cooperation among responders were hampered, as in previous disasters, by the lack of a structured command system. Application of an incident command system may improve disaster coordination in Japan.

Type
Special Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Amagasaki Fire Department: After Action Report on the train crash of the Japan Railway Fukuchiyama line, Printed on September 2005, not available to the public.Google Scholar
2. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan: Report on the train crash on the Japan Railway Fukuchiyama line, Version 7. Available in Japanese at http://www.bousai.go.jp/saigaikinkyu/index.html. Accessed30 July 2005.Google Scholar
3. Fire and Disaster Management Agency: Report of the Train Crash in Amagasaki, Version 32. Available [inJapanese] at http://www.fdma.go.jp/detail/583.html. Accessed 30 July 2005.Google Scholar
4.Yoshida, S: First response of a community hospital to disaster: The Amagasaki train crash. Shyakai Hoken Jyunpo 2005;2246:1012.Google Scholar
5. Kobe Newspaper: Amagasaki train derailment incident. Available in Japanese at http://www.kobe-np.co.jp/news_now/ama_dassen.shtml. Accessed 30 July 2005.Google Scholar
6. Japanese Association for Disaster Medicine: After Action Report on the train crash of the Japan Railway Fukuchiyama line. Available at http://square.umin.ac/jp/jadam/toku-iin/amagaski2.pdf. Accessed February 2006.Google Scholar
7.Ukai, T, Takahashi, Y, Aono, M: Disaster Medicine Learned from Cases. Tokyo: Nankodo Co., 1995, pp 121–127.Google Scholar
8.Okumura, T, Takasu, N, Ishimatsu, S et al. : Report on 640 victims of the Tokyo subway sarin attack. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28(2):129135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Okumura, T, Suzuki, K, Fukuda, A et al. : The Tokyo subway sarin attack: Disaster management, Part 1: Community emergency response. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5(6):613617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Okumura, T, Suzuki, K, Fukuda, A et al. : The Tokyo subway sarin attack: Disaster management, Part 2: Hospital response. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5(6):618624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Okumura, T, Suzuki, K, Fukuda, A et al. : The Tokyo subway sarin attack: Disaster management, Part 3: National and international responses. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5(6):625628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Katzman, S: Preparing for the worst: The USA and Japan's preparations for a terrorist attack with chemical or biological weapons. European Molecular Biology Organization 2000;1(5):387389.Google ScholarPubMed
13. City of Akashi: The Report of the 32nd Akashi Festival Disaster. Available in Japanese at www.city.akashi.hyogo.jp/soumu/bousai_ka/h_safety/jiko_index.html. Accessed 30 July 2005.Google Scholar
14.Motomura, N, Iwakiri, M, , Takino et al. : School crisis intervention in the Ikeda incident: Organization and activity of the mental support team. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2003;57(2):239240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan: Preparedness for disasters. Available in Japanese at http://www.bousai.go.jp. Accessed 30 July 2005.Google Scholar
16.Kunii, O, Akagi, M: The medical and public health response to the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake in Japan: A case study in disaster planning. Med Glob Surviv 1995;2(4):214225.Google Scholar
17.Kita, E: Final report of the research project on health and medical assistance for affected persons. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Government of Japan, 1996.Google Scholar
18. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan: Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake research paper. Available in Japanese at http://www.hanshin-awaji.or.jp/kyoukun/eng/. Accessed 30 July 2005.Google Scholar
19.Tanaka, K: The Kobe earthquake: The system response.A disaster report from Japan. Eur J Emerg Med 1996;3(4):263269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Ukai, T: The Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake and the problems with emergency medical care. Ren Fail 1997;19(5):633645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Baba, S, Taniguchi, H, Nambu, S et al. : The Great Hanshin Earthquake. Lancet 1996;347(8997):307309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Miyamoto, M, Sako, M, Kimura, M et al. : Great earthquakes and medical information systems, with special reference to telecommunications. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999;6(3):252258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Bissell, RA, Pinet, L, Nelson, M et al. : Evidence of the effectiveness of health sector preparedness in disaster response: The example of four earthquakes. Fam Community Health 2004;27(3):193203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Inui, A, Uemoto, M: Medical triage and legal protection in Japan. Lancet 2002; 360(9344):1514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Schultz, CH, Koenig, KL, Noji, EK: A medical disaster response to reduce immediate mortality after an earthquake. N Engl J Med 1996;334(7):438444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Benson, M, Koenig, KL, Schultz, CH: Disaster triage: START, then SAVE– A new method of dynamic triage for victims of a catastrophic earthquake. Prehosp Disast Med 1996;11(2):117124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Lewin, MR, Hori, S, Aikawa, N: Emergency medical services in Japan: An opportunity for the rational development of prehospital care and research. J Emerg Med 2005;28(2):237241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Kobayashi, K: Challenges for improving trauma care in Japan. J Trauma 2005;58(6):11341139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Shimazaki, S, Yamaguchi, Y, Murata, A et al. : Postgraduate trauma education for surgeons from the viewpoint of trauma and emergency physicians. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 2003;104(3):290293.Google Scholar
30.Maningas, PA, Robison, M, Mallonee, S: The emergency medical service response to the Oklahoma City bombing. Prehosp Disast Med 1997;12(2):8085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Gonzalez, D: Crush syndrome. Crit Care Med 2005;331:s34s41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Firescope Website. Available at http://www.firescope.org. Accessed 30 July 2005.Google Scholar
33.Auf der Heide, E: Disaster medicine, disaster planning, Part II. Emerg Med Clin N Am 1996;14:453480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Stratton, SJ, Hastings, VP, Isbell, D: The 1994 Northridge earthquake disaster response: The local emergency medical services agencies experience. Prehosp Disast Med 1996;11(3):172179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Zane, RD, Prestipino, AL: Implementing the Hospital Emergency Incident Command System: An integrated delivery system's experience. Prehosp Disast Med 2004;19(4):311317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Hospital Emergency Incident Command System Update Project: California Emergency Medical Services Authority. Available at http://www.emsa.ca.gov/Dms2/heics3.htm. Accessed 30 July 2005.Google Scholar
37.Jagminas, L, Bubly, G: The Hospital Emergency Incident Command System–Are you ready? Med Health R I 2003;86(7):193195.Google ScholarPubMed
38.Arnold, JL, Paturas, J, Rodoplu, U: Measures of effectiveness of hospitalincident command system performance. Prehosp Disast Med 2005;20(3):202205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Bosner, L: Emergency management in Japan. Report of the Mike Mansfield Fellowship Program, 2001.Google Scholar