Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:51:09.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidemiological Surveillance Linked to an Outreach Psychological Support Program after the Xynthia Storm in Charente-Maritime, France, 2010

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2012

Marie-Eve Raguenaud*
Affiliation:
French Institute for Public Health Surveillance (InVS), Poitiers Regional Office, Poitiers, France
Philippe Germonneau
Affiliation:
French Institute for Public Health Surveillance (InVS), Poitiers Regional Office, Poitiers, France
Jackie Leseigneur
Affiliation:
Hospital of La Rochelle, Psychiatry, Medico-Psychological Emergency Unit (CUMP) for the Département of Charente-Maritime, La Rochelle, France
Jean-Jacques Chavagnat
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Poitiers, Psychiatry, Medico-Psychological Emergency Unit (CUMP) for the Poitou-Charentes Region, Poitiers, France
Yvon Motreff
Affiliation:
French Institute for Public Health Surveillance (InVS), Department of Environmental Health, Saint-Maurice, France
Martine Vivier-Darrigol
Affiliation:
Regional Health Agency (ARS) of Poitou-Charentes, Department of Public Health, Poitiers, France
Philippe Pirard
Affiliation:
French Institute for Public Health Surveillance (InVS), Department of Environmental Health, Saint-Maurice, France
*
Correspondence: Marie-Eve Raguenaud, MD, MSc Cellule de l'Institut de Veille Sanitaire en Régions (Cire) Limousin et Poitou-Charentes Agence Régionale de Santé Poitou-Charentes 4, Rue Micheline Ostermeyer BP 20570 86 021 Poitiers CEDEX E-mail [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction

Following the Xynthia storm of February 2010 in France, an outreach program was initiated by the regional health authorities during the post-emergency phase to improve access to mental health care for the population exposed to the floods. The program was designed to complement routine health and social care services. It relied on a special telephone service and outreach consultations located in the town halls of the five most affected cities. The objective of this outreach service was to provide initial psychological counseling free of charge and without appointment. Another objective was to refer persons for appropriate treatment and follow-up by routine health care services. A surveillance program was developed to monitor the use of mental health services by first-time users, describe outreach service users with psychological manifestations, and provide timely information to decision makers.

Methods

Health providers working in affected towns were asked to complete an individual record sheet for each person who displayed psychological manifestations directly or indirectly linked with the storm on their first visit, and to send it to the regional health office. Participation was voluntary. Data analysis was performed monthly during the six-month surveillance period.

Results

Only mental health providers participated in the surveillance. A total of 227 individual files were sent from April 7 through September 19, 2010. New cases were mainly female adults, and one fifth had a past history of psychiatric illness. Depressive signs and anxiety were the most commonly reported symptoms, followed by signs of post-traumatic stress disorder. A total of five feedback reports were produced for surveillance participants (informants) and authorities.

Conclusion

With initiation in the post-emergency phase of a disaster and timely regular feedback, the surveillance program enabled the authors to describe the occurrence of psychological distress, monitor mental health service use by first-time users, and provide guidance to health authorities. This research showed the advantages of integrating epidemiology in the development of strategy for mental health and psychosocial support in the aftermath of natural catastrophes.

RaguenaudM-E , GermonneauP , LeseigneurJ , ChavagnatJJ , MotreffY , Vivier-DarrigolM , PirardP . Epidemiological Surveillance Linked to an Outreach Psychological Support Program after the Xynthia Storm in Charente-Maritime, France, 2010. Prehosp Disaster Med.2012;27(5):1-6.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ministère de l’écologie, de l’énergie, du développement durable et de la mer. Rapport sur l’évaluation des dommages causés par la tempête Xynthia des 27 et 28 février 2010 à prendre en compte à titre du fonds de solidarité de l'Union européenne (Evaluation report on damages caused by Xynthia storm on 27-28 February 2010 for consideration for European Union aid funding). June 2010.Google Scholar
2. Rapport d'activité des services de l’État en Charente-Maritime Session du Conseil général de la Charente-Maritime. Neuf premiers mois de mesures pour faire face à l’événement et répondre aux dégâts causés (Nine months of measures to deal with and respond to damages). December 2010.Google Scholar
3. Ahern, M, Kovats, RS, Wilkinson, P, Few, R, Matthies, F. Global health impacts of floods: epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiol Rev. 2005;27:36-46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Cellule interrégionale d’épidémiologie Nord, Observation régional de santé de Picardie. Enquête santé chez les inondés de la Somme au printemps 2001 (Health survey among flooded victims in Somme, Spring 2001) ; 2005. Amiens University Hospital Report No. ESIS2001.Google Scholar
5. Ligier, K, Ganiayre, F, Zielinski, O, et al. Health survey among flood victims in the Somme area. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2005;53(6):658-665.Google Scholar
6. Carroll, B, Morbey, H, Balogh, R, Araoz, G. Flooded homes, broken bonds, the meaning of home, psychological processes and their impact on psychological health in a disaster. Health Place. 2009;15(2):540-547.Google Scholar
7. Pitt M. The Pitt Review: lessons learned from the 2007 floods. Cabinet Office; June 2008.Google Scholar
8. Abramson, D, Stehling-Ariza, T, Garfield, R, Redlener, I. Prevalence and predictors of mental health distress post-Katrina: findings from the Gulf Coast Child and Family Health Study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(2):77-86.Google Scholar
9. Kessler, RC, Galea, S, Gruber, MJ, Sampson, NA, Ursano, RJ, Wessely, S. Trends in mental illness and suicidality after Hurricane Katrina. Mol Psychiatry. 2008;13(4):374-384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Ahern, M, Sari Kovats, R, Wilkinson, P, Few, R, Matthies, F. Global health impacts of floods: epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiol Rev. 2005;27:36-46.Google Scholar
11. Kessler, RC, Wittchen, HU. Post-disaster mental health need assessment surveys – the challenge of improved future research. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008;17 Suppl 2:S1-5.Google Scholar
12. Galea, S, Maxwell, AR, Norris, F. Sampling and design challenges in studying the mental health consequences of disasters. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008;17 Suppl 2:S21-28.Google Scholar
13. Boscarino, JA, Adams, RE, Figley, CR: Mental health service use 1-year after the World Trade Center disaster: implications for mental health care. Gene Hosp Psychiatry. 2004;26(5):346-358.Google Scholar
14. Kiliç, C. Health services use for earthquake-related psychological problems: results from the 1999 earthquakes in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry. 2008;19(2):1-11.Google Scholar
15. Soeteman, RJH, Yzermans, CJ, Kerssens, JJ, et al: The course of post-disaster health problems of victims with pre-disaster psychological problems as presented in general practice. Family Practice. 2006;23:378-384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Van der Velden, PG, Grievink, L, Kleber, R, et al. Post-disaster mental health problems and the utilization of mental health services: a four-year longitudinal comparative study. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006;33:279-288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Wang, PS, Gruber, MJ, Powers, RE, et al. Mental health service use among hurricane Katrina survivors in the eight months after the disaster. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58(11):1403-1411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. CDC. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the guidelines working group. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5013a1.htm. Accessed January 3, 2012.Google Scholar