Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T12:49:00.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhancing Triage and Management in Earthquake-Related Injuries: The SAFE-QUAKE Scoring System for Predicting Dialysis Requirements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2023

Sarper Yılmaz*
Affiliation:
University of Health Sciences, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Secretary of the Disaster Commission of the Turkish Emergency Medicine Association, Ankara, Turkey
Remzi Cetinkaya
Affiliation:
University of Health Sciences, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Diyarbakır Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey
Mehmet Ozel
Affiliation:
University of Health Sciences, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Diyarbakır Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey
Ali Cankut Tatliparmak
Affiliation:
Uskudar University Faculty of Medicine, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
Rohat Ak
Affiliation:
University of Health Sciences, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Correspondence: Sarper Yılmaz, MD Department of Emergency Medicine University of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey Secretary of the Disaster Commission of the Turkish Emergency Medicine Association Ankara, Turkey E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objectives:

Identifying early predictors of dialysis requirements in earthquake-related injuries is crucial for optimal resource allocation and timely intervention. This study aimed to develop a predictive scoring system, named SAFE-QUAKE (Seismic Assessment of Kidney Function to Rule Out Dialysis Requirement), to identify patients at high risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI) and requiring dialysis.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 205 patients presenting with earthquake-related injuries. Patients were divided into two groups based on their need for dialysis: the no dialysis group (n = 170) and the dialysis group (n = 35). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected and compared between the two groups to identify significant predictors of dialysis requirements. The parameters that would form the score were determined by conducting an importance analysis using artificial neural networks (ANNs) to identify parameters that exhibited statistically significant differences in univariate analysis.

Results:

The dialysis group had a significantly longer median duration of being trapped under debris (48 hours) compared to the no dialysis group (eight hours). Blood gas and laboratory analyses revealed significant differences in pH levels, lactate values, creatinine levels, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and aspartate transaminase (AST)-to-alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio between the two groups. Based on these findings, the SAFE-QUAKE rule-out scoring system was developed, incorporating entrapment duration (<45 hours), pH levels (>7.31), creatinine levels (<2mg/dL), LDH levels (<1600mg/dL), and the AST-to-ALT ratio (<2.4) as key predictors of dialysis requirements. This score included 139 patients, and among them, only one patient required dialysis, resulting in a negative predictive value of 99.29%.

Conclusions:

The SAFE-QUAKE scoring system demonstrated a high negative predictive value of 99.29% in ruling out the need for dialysis among earthquake-related injury cases. This scoring system offers a practical approach for health care providers to identify patients at high risk of developing AKI and requiring dialysis in earthquake-affected regions.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Yılmaz, S, Karakayali, O, Yilmaz, S, et al. Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey Disaster Committee Summary of Field Observations of February 6th Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023;38(3):415418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yilmaz, S. Transportation model utilized in the first week following the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes in Turkey - transport health centers. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023;31(1):40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajagopalan, S. Crush injuries and the crush syndrome. Med J Armed Forces India. 2010;66(4):317320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bazyar, J, Farrokhi, M, Khankeh, H. Triage systems in mass-casualty incidents and disasters: a review study with a worldwide approach. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(3):482494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sever, MS, Vanholder, R; RDRTF of ISN Work Group on Recommendations for the Management of Crush Victims in Mass Disasters. Recommendation for the management of crush victims in mass disasters. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(Suppl 1):i167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanholder, R, Sever, MS, De Smet, M, Erek, E, Lameire, N. Intervention of the renal disaster relief task force in the 1999 Marmara, Turkey earthquake. Kidney Int. 2001;59(2):783791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peek-Asa, C, Kraus, JF, Bourque, LB, et al. Fatal and hospitalized injuries resulting from the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Int J Epidemol. 1998;27(3):459465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittaker, R, Fareed, D, Green, P, Barry, P, Borge, A, Fletes-Barrios, R. Earthquake disaster in Nicaragua: reflections on the initial management of massive casualties. J Trauma. 1974;14(1):3743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AFAD President Sezer. [The loss of life in the earthquake was 50 thousand 96 and the number of injured was 107 thousand 204]. DHA | Demirören Haber Ajansı. 2023. https://www.dha.com.tr/gundem/afad-baskani-sezer-depremde-can-kaybi-50-bin-96-yaralanan-sayisi-ise-107-bin-204-2224110. Accessed June 19, 2023.Google Scholar
Oda, J, Tanaka, H, Yoshioka, T, et al. Analysis of 372 patients with crush syndrome caused by the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1997;42(3):470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yokota, J. Crush syndrome in disaster. JMAJ. 2005;48:341–52.Google Scholar
Richards, NT, Tattersall, J, McCann, M, Samson, A, Mathias, T, Johnson, A. Dialysis for acute renal failure due to crush injuries after the Armenian earthquake. BMJ. 1989;298(6671):443445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Earthquakes, Briggs SM.. Surg Clin North Am. 2006;86(3):537544.Google Scholar
Sever, MS, Vanholder, R, Lameire, N. Management of crush-related injuries after disasters. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(10):10521063.10.1056/NEJMra054329CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Najafi, I, Van Biesen, W, Sharifi, A, et al. Early detection of patients at high risk for acute kidney injury during disasters: development of a scoring system based on the Bam earthquake experience. J Nephrol. 2008;21(5):776782.Google ScholarPubMed
Benson, M, Koenig, KL, Schultz, CH. Disaster triage: START, then SAVE--a new method of dynamic triage for victims of a catastrophic earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1996;11(2):117124.10.1017/S1049023X0004276XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowd evacuation using multi-agent system with leader-following behavior. IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8266037. Accessed June 19, 2023.Google Scholar
Zanlungo, F, Ikeda, T, Kanda, T. Social force model with explicit collision prediction. EPL. 2011;93(6):68005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagheb, MM, Sharifian, M, Roozbeh, J, Moini, M, Gholami, K, Sadeghi, H. Effect of fluid therapy on prevention of acute renal failure in Bam earthquake crush victims. Renal Failure. 2008;30(9):831835.10.1080/08860220802353785CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatamizadeh, P, Najafi, I, Vanholder, R, et al. Epidemiologic aspects of the Bam earthquake in Iran: the nephrologic perspective. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47(3):428438.10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.11.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sever, MS, Erek, E, Vanholder, R, et al. The Marmara earthquake: epidemiological analysis of the victims with nephrological problems. Kidney Int. 2001;60(3):11141123.10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.0600031114.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baeza-Trinidad, R. Rhabdomyolysis: a syndrome to be considered. Med Clin (Barc). 2022;158(6):277283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshimura, N, Nakayama, S, Nakagiri, K, Azami, T, Ataka, K, Ishii, N. Profile of chest injuries arising from the 1995 southern Hyogo Prefecture earthquake. Chest. 1996;110(3):759761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peek-Asa, C, Kraus, JF, Bourque, LB, Vimalachandra, D, Yu, J, Abrams, J. Fatal and hospitalized injuries resulting from the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27(3):459465.10.1093/ije/27.3.459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, W, Qian, J, Liu, X, et al. Management of severe crush injury in a front-line tent ICU after 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China: an experience with 32 cases. Crit Care. 2009;13(6):R178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Z, Zeng, X, Fu, P, et al. Predictive factors for acute renal failure in crush injuries in the Sichuan earthquake. Injury. 2012;43(5):613618.10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubinstein, I, Abassi, Z, Coleman, R, Milman, F, Winaver, J, Better, OS. Involvement of nitric oxide system in experimental muscle crush injury. J Clin Invest. 1998;101(6):13251333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plötz, FB, Bouma, AB, van Wijk, JAE, Kneyber, MCJ, Bökenkamp, A. Pediatric acute kidney injury in the ICU: an independent evaluation of pRIFLE criteria. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(9):17131717.10.1007/s00134-008-1176-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeolekar, ME, Mehta, S. ICU care in India--status and challenges. J Assoc Physicians India. 2008;56:221222.Google ScholarPubMed
Feng, J, Zen, P, Liu, Y, Luo, J, Jiang, W, Peng, G. Serum enzyme profile characteristics of victims following the Wenchuan earthquake in China. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47(5):590595.10.1515/CCLM.2009.127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sever, MS, Erek, E, Vanholder, R, et al. Clinical findings in the renal victims of a catastrophic disaster: the Marmara earthquake. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(11):19421949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleveland Clinic. Creatine Kinase (CK): What It Is, Purpose & Procedure. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/22692-creatine-kinase-ck. Accessed June 19, 2023.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Yılmaz et al. supplementary material

Yılmaz et al. supplementary material

Download Yılmaz et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 969.8 KB