Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:08:07.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergency Medical Service Providers’ Perspectives towards Management of the Morbidly Obese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

John J. Cienki
John J. Cienki*
Affiliation:
Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FloridaUSA
*
Correspondence: John J. Cienki, MD, MSPH 1611 NW 12th Avenue Holtz 1195 Miami, Florida 33136 USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Obesity is a growing epidemic in the United States with increasing burden to the health care system. Management and transport of the morbidly obese (MO) pose challenges for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers. Though equipment and resources are being directed to the transport of the obese, little research exists to guide these efforts. To address this, the author of this study sought to assess EMS providers’ perspectives on the challenges of caring for MO patients.

Methods

An anonymous, web-based survey was distributed to all active providers of prehospital transport of a large, urban, fire-based EMS system to evaluate the challenges of MO patients. The definition of MO was left up to the provider. This survey looked at various components of transport: lifting, transport time, airway management, establishing intravenous access, drug administration, as well as demographics, equipment, and education needs. The survey contained yes/no, rank-order, and Likert scale questions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The study was approved by the University of Miami (Miami, Florida USA) Institutional Review Board.

Results

Of survey participants, 71.9% felt the average weight of their patients had increased, and 100% reported to have transported a MO patient. Of calls made to EMS, 25% were only for assistance in the house and another 25% were for non-emergent transport to a health care facility; shortness of breath was the most common emergent complaint. Of specific challenges to properly care for MO patients, 94.4 % ranked lifting and/or moving the patient highest, followed by airway management, intravenous access, and measuring vital signs. A total of 43.8% of respondents felt that MO patients require at least six to eight EMS personnel to transport patients while 31.8% felt more than eight providers were necessary. Greater than 81.3% felt it would be beneficial to receive more training and 90.4% felt more equipment was needed. Of participants, 68.8 % felt that MO patients did not receive the same standard of care.

Conclusions

Surveyed participants reported that patient’s weights are increasing with all having transported a MO patient. Despite the majority of transports being for non-emergent problems, providers felt more training would be beneficial, that equipment available does not meet needs, and that the MO pose challenges to appropriate patient care.

CienkiJJ. Emergency Medical Service Providers’ Perspectives towards Management of the Morbidly Obese. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(5):471–474.

Keywords

EMSobesityprehospital
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , October 2016 , pp. 471 - 474
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. World Health Organization. World Health Organization obesity epidemic puts millions at risk from related diseases. Press release WHO/46; June 12, 1997. http://www.who.int/archives/inf-pr-1997/en/pr97-46.htm. Accessed September 1, 2015.Google Scholar
2. Finkelstein, EA, Khavjou, OA, Thompson, H, et al. Obesity and severe obesity forecasts through 2030. Amer J Preventive Med. 2012;42(6):563-570.Google Scholar
3. Grant, P, Newcombe, M. Emergency management of the morbidly obese. Emerg Med Australasia. 2004;16(4):309-317.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Boatright, JR. Transporting the morbidly obese patient: framing an EMS challenge. J Emerg Nursing. 2002;28(4):326-329.Google Scholar
5. Dargin, J, Medzon, R. Emergency department management of the airway in obese adults. Annals Emerg Med. 2010;56(2):95-104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Maxwell, MH, Waks, AU, Schroth, PC, Karam, M, Dornfeld, LP. Error in blood-pressure measurement due to incorrect cuff size in obese patients. Lancet. 1982;2(8288):33-36.Google Scholar
7. Cheymol, G. Effects of obesity on pharmacokinetics - implications for drug therapy. Clin Pharmacokinetics. 2000;39(3):215-231.Google Scholar
8. Dor, A, Ferguson, C, Langwith, C, Tan, E. A heavy burden: the individual costs of being overweight and obese in the United States. In: George Washington University School of Health Policy; Washington, DC USA. 2010: 25.Google Scholar
9. Fernandes, CM, Clark, S, Price, A, Innes, G. How accurately do we estimate patients’ weight in emergency departments? Can Fam Physician. 1999;45:2373-2376.Google Scholar
10. MacKenzie, EJ, Carlini, AR. Characterizing Local EMS Systems. (Report No. DOT HS 811 824). Washington, DC USA: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. August 2013.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cienki supplementary material

Cienki supplementary material 1

Download Cienki supplementary material(File)
File 18.5 KB