Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:59:56.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emergency Department-Based HIV Testing Services and Self-Testing Programs: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers and Patients in Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Adam Aluisio
Affiliation:
Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA
Scarlett Bergam
Affiliation:
GW University, Washington DC, USA
Janet Sugut
Affiliation:
Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
Kate Guthrie
Affiliation:
Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA
John Kinuthia
Affiliation:
Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
Michael Mello
Affiliation:
Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Young people in Sub-Saharan Africa, especially males, have been insufficiently engaged in HIV Testing Services (HTS). In Kenya, these persons are often treated in emergency departments (EDs) for injuries, a healthcare interaction where HTS including HIV self-testing (HIVST) could be leveraged. There is, however, limited data from stakeholders on ED-HTS which impedes programmatic advancement.

Method:

A qualitative study was completed to understand facilitators and challenges for ED-HTS and HIVST delivery in Kenya (12/2021-03/2022). Data were collected via 28 in-depth patient interviews (14 males and 14 females) who had been treated in the Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) ED and through seven focus-group discussions conducted with 49 ED healthcare personnel (nurses, doctors, HIV testing counselors, and administrators). Transcripts were double-coded and thematically analyzed with Dedoose™ software using a parallel inductive and deductive approach to capture both a priori and emergent themes.

Results:

Patients and providers viewed ED-HTS as a beneficial provision that was facilitated by engaged staff, education, perceived high HIV risk, and confidentiality. However, ED-HTS was limited by burdens on staff time and material resources, lacking systems integration, and patient illness severity. Facilitators of ED-HIVST delivery were perceived to have greater autonomy and confidentiality as well as lower health resource utilization. Challenges for ED-HIVST identified included patients’ concerns about HIVST accuracy and psychological stress, as well as providers’ concerns for loss to follow up and inability to complete confirmatory testing.

Conclusion:

ED stakeholders are receptive to HTS and HIVST provisions. This data provides insight into the patient, provider, and systems aspects that can be leveraged in ED-based HTS to enhance program impacts via intervention functions in the forms of education, care integration, resource scaling, and solidified post-self-testing follow-up mechanisms.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine