Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:12:16.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of EMS Transportation on Time to Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Robert Swor ,
William Anderson ,
Raymond Jackson  and
Andrew Wilson
Robert Swor*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Mich.
William Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Troy, Mich.
Raymond Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Mich.
Andrew Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Mich.
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W. 13 Mile Road, Royal Oak, MI 48073USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Recent studies have documented decreased time to emergency department (ED) thrombolytic therapy with the use of prehospital electrocardiography.

Purpose:

Is the time to ED diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with thrombolytic agents decreased by emergency medical services (EMS) transport when compared with those transported by other means (non-EMS)?

Design:

Retrospective, case-control study

Population:

The AMI patients treated with thrombolytic agents at a 34,000-visit, community hospital ED during 1992.

Methods:

Review of records of patients who received thrombolytic therapy for AMI. Statistical analysis was performed using “Student's” t-test and Yates corrected Chi-square (X2).

Results:

Eighty-seven patients received thrombolytic agents for AMI during 1992; 33 arrived by ambulance, 54 arrived by other methods. There were no differences in age, gender, or time of ED arrival among these groups. Ambulance patients received standard advanced life support (ALS) care, but not a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) or thrombolytic agents. Ambulance patients experienced a significantly shorter time to first ECG (12.9 ±9.1 min. versus 20.8 ±25.3 win.; p = .028) and received thrombolytic therapy sooner than did controls (56.0 ±31.5 min. versus 78.0 ±63.4 min.; p = .018). There was no difference in time from diagnosis to treatment between these groups.

Conclusion:

Emergency medical services transport of AMI patients in this study decreased time to diagnosis and treatment and may be a confounder in studies that assess the value of field EMS interventions. Non-EMS AMI patients did not receive as rapid diagnosis and treatment, and emergency physicians should evaluate and address this issue in their departments.

Keywords

acute myocardial infarctionECG transmissionemergenciesparamedicsprehospitalthrombolytic therapy
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 160 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Weaver, WD: Factors influencing the time to hospital administration of thrombolytic therapy: Results from a large national registry. Circulation 1992;86:1–16 (Abstract).Google Scholar
2. European Myocardial Infarction Project Group: Prehospital thrombolytic therapy in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993;329:383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Karagounis, L, Ipsen, SK, Jessop, MR et al. : Impact of field-transmitted electrocardiography on time to in-hospital thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:786–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Hartmann, J, McKeever, L, Bufaline, V et al. : A systems approach to intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction in community hospitals: The influence of paramedics. Clin Cardiol 1988;11:812–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Kereiakes, DJ, Weaver, WD, Anderson, JL et al. : Time delays in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: A tale of eight cities. Report from the prehospital study group and the Cincinnati heart project. Am Heart J 1990;120:773–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Kereiakes, DJ, Gibler, WB, Martin, LH et al. : Relative importance of emergency medical system transport and the prehospital electrocardiogram on reducing hospital time delay to therapy for AMI: A preliminary report from the Cincinnati heart project. Am Heart J 1992;123:835–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Ornato, JP: Role of the emergency department in decreasing the time to thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol); 13:48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Gonzalez, ER, Jones, LA, Ornato, JP et al. : Hospital delays and the problem with thrombolytic administration in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy: A multicenter prospective assessment. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:1215–1221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Auf der Heide, TP, Hendley, GE, Woo, J et al. : A prospective evaluartion of prehospital 12-lead ECG application in chest pain patients. J Electrocardiol 1992:24:8–13 (Supplement).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Gibler, WB, Kereiakes, DJ, Dean, EN et al. : Prehospital diagnosis and treatment of AMI: A north-south perspective. Am Heart J 1991;121:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Weaver, DW, Cerqueira, M, Halstrom, AP et al. : Prehospital-initiated vs. hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy: The myocardial infarction triage and intervention trial. JAMA 1993;270:1211–1216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Bossaert, LL, Demey, HE, Colemont, LJ et al. : Prehospital thrombolytic therapy of AMI with anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex. Crit Care Med 1988;16:823–830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Kennedy, JW, Weaver, WD: The potential for prehospital thrombolytic therapy. Clin Cardiol 1990;13:VIII 23–26.Google ScholarPubMed
14. Grim, PS, Feldman, T, Childers, RW: Evaluation of patients for the need of thrombolytic therapy in the prehospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:483–488.Google ScholarPubMed
15. Dean, NC, Haug, PJ, Hawker, PJ: Effect of mobile paramedic units on outcome in patients with myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 1987;17:1034–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar