Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:11:45.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Prehospital Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2019

K.T. Ng Open the ORCID record for K.T. Ng [Opens in a new window]  and
W.Y. Teoh Open the ORCID record for W.Y. Teoh [Opens in a new window]
K.T. Ng*
Affiliation:
Medical Officer (Doctor), Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
W.Y. Teoh
Affiliation:
Medical Student, University of Liverpool, School of Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
*
Correspondence:Ka Ting Ng, Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Epinephrine has been recommended for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation for nearly one century, but its efficacy and safety remain unclear in the literature. The primary aim of this review was to determine whether epinephrine increases the return of spontaneous circulation in OHCA patients.

Methods:

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL, from their inception until October 2018. All the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Observational studies, case reports, case series, and non-systematic reviews were excluded.

Results:

Two trials including 8,548 patients were eligible for inclusion in the data synthesis. In patients who received epinephrine during OHCA, the incidence of return of spontaneous circulation was increased, with an odds ratio (95%CI) of 4.25 (3.79-4.75), P <.001, high-quality of evidence. The number of patients transported to hospital was increased in patients who had prehospital epinephrine, with an odds ratio (95%CI) of 2.31 (2.11-2.53), P <.001, high-quality of evidence. The prehospital use of epinephrine was associated with an increased survival to hospital discharge, the odds ratio (95%CI) being 1.43 (1.10-1.87), P = .008, moderate-quality of evidence. No significant effect was noted on the favorable neurologic state of patient at hospital discharge, with an odds ratio (95%CI) of 1.21 (0.90-1.64), P = .21, moderate-quality of evidence.

Conclusions:

This meta-analysis suggests that the prehospital use of epinephrine increases return of spontaneous circulation, transport of patients to hospital, and survival to hospital discharge for OHCA. However, no significant effects on favorable neurologic function at hospital discharge were demonstrated. The general quality of evidence ranged from moderate to high.

Keywords

cardiac arrestemergency medicineepinephrinefirst aidresuscitation
Type
Comprehensive Review
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 34 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 532 - 539
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, EJ, Spartano, NL, Judd, SE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):E67–E492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meng, C, Yue, W, Xuan, L, et al. Public knowledge and attitudes towards bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in China. BioMed Research International 2017;2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, MS, Berkow, LC, Kudenchuk, PJ, et al. Part 7: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015;132(18):S444–S464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sasson, C, Rogers, MAM, Dahl, J, et al. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2010;3(1):63–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Overgaard, CB, Džavík, V. Inotropes and vasopressors: review of physiology and clinical use in cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2008;118(10):1047–1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, IG, Finn, JC, Jelinek, GA, et al. Effect of adrenaline on survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2011;82(9):1138–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagihara, A, Hasegawa, M, Abe, T, et al. Prehospital epinephrine use and survival among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2012;307(11):1161–1168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordseth, T, Skogvoll, E, Olasveengen, TM, et al. Dynamic effects of adrenaline (epinephrine) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with initial pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Resuscitation. 2012;83(8):946–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagawa, Y, Sakamoto, T. Analysis of prehospital care for cardiac arrest in an urban setting in Japan. J Emerg Med. 2010;38(3):340–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, JR, Guerci, AD, Koehler, RC, et al. Mechanisms by which epinephrine augments cerebral and myocardial perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs. Circulation. 1984;69(4):822–835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herlitz, J, Ekström, L, Wennerblom, B, et al. Adrenaline in out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Does it make any difference? Resuscitation. 1995;29(3):195–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soar, J, Nolan, JP, Böttiger, BW, et al. Adult advanced life support: Section 3 of the European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Notfall und Rettungsmedizin. 2015;18(8):770–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinman, ME, Perkins, GD, Bhanji, F, et al. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Scientific Knowledge Gaps and Clinical Research Priorities for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: a consensus statement. Resuscitation. 2018;127:132–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shamseer, L, Moher, D, Clarke, M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, J, Green, S, (ed). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. London, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed March 19, 2019.Google Scholar
Ryan, R, Hill, S. How to GRADE the quality of the evidence. Cochrane Consumers and Communication, 2016. https://colorectal.cochrane.org/sites/colorectal.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/how_to_grade.pdf. Accessed March 19, 2019.Google Scholar
Choi, SW, Lam, DMH. Heterogeneity in meta-analyses. Comparing apples and oranges? Anaesthesia. 2017;72(4):532–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, GD, Ji, C, Deakin, CD, et al. A randomized trial of epinephrine in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(8):711–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atiksawedparit, P, Rattanasiri, S, McEvoy, M, et al. Effects of prehospital adrenaline administration on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care. 2014;18(4):463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, S, Morrison, LJ, Callaway, CW, et al. Adrenaline for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Resuscitation. 2014;85(6):732–740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reardon, PM, Magee, K. Epinephrine in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a critical review. World J Emerg Med. 2013;4(2):85–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shao, H, Li, C-S. Epinephrine in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: helpful or harmful? Chinese Medical Journal. 2017;130(17):2112–2116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempton, H, Vlok, R, Thang, C, et al. Standard dose epinephrine versus placebo in out of hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(3):511–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, W, Teo, GKW, Tan, JW-C, et al. Influence of comorbidities and clinical prediction model on neurological prognostication post out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Heart Asia. 2018;10(2):e011016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolan, JP, Soar, J, Cariou, A, et al. European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines for post-resuscitation care 2015. Section 5 of the European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Resuscitation. 2015;95:202–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schenone, AL, Cohen, A, Patarroyo, G, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: a systematic review/meta-analysis exploring the impact of expanded criteria and targeted temperature. Resuscitation. 2016;108:102–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelm, RF, Wagenführer, J, Engelhard, K, et al. Effects of levosimendan on hemodynamics, local cerebral blood flow, neuronal injury, and neuroinflammation after asphyctic cardiac arrest in rats. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(6):e410–e419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koudouna, E, Xanthos, T, Bassiakou, E, et al. Levosimendan improves the initial outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a swine model of cardiac arrest. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2007;51(8):1123–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, B, Peng, YG, Zhao, S, et al. Supplement of levosimendan to epinephrine improves initial resuscitation outcomes from asphyxial cardiac arrest. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17:18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greco, T, Calabrò, MG, Covello, RD, et al. A Bayesian network meta-analysis on the effect of inodilatory agents on mortality. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114(5):746–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ng, KT, Chan, XL, Tan, W, et al. Levosimendan use in patients with preoperative low ejection fraction undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2018;52:37–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierrakos, C, Velissaris, D, Franchi, F, et al. Levosimendan in critical illness: a literature review. J Clin Med Res. 2014;6(2):75–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Toller, WG, Stranz, C. Levosimendan, a new inotropic and vasodilator agent. Anesthesiology. 2006;104(3):556–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olasveengen, TM, Wik, L, Sunde, K, et al. Outcome when adrenaline (epinephrine) was actually given vs. not given - post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Resuscitation. 2012;83(3):327–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhouse, SP, Cox, S, Boyd, P, et al. High dose and standard dose adrenaline do not alter survival, compared with placebo, in cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 1995;30(3):243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, CG, Martin, DR, Pepe, PE, et al. A Comparison of standard-dose and high-dose epinephrine in cardiac arrest outside the hospital. New Eng J Med. 1992; 327(15):1051–1055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stiell, IG, Hebert, PC, Weitzman, BN, et al. High-dose epinephrine in adult cardiac arrest. N Eng J Med. 1992;327(15):1045–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goto, Y, Maeda, T, Goto, YN. Effects of prehospital epinephrine during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with initial non-shockable rhythm: an observational cohort study. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauch, J, Spielmann, N, Weiss, M, et al. Intravenous versus intramuscular epinephrine administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a pilot study in piglets. Paediatric Anaesthesia. 2013;23(10):906–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fries, M, Weil, MH, Chang, YT, et al. Microcirculation during cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(12 SUPPL):S454–S457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halvorsen, P, Sharma, HS, Basu, S, et al. Neural injury after use of vasopressin and adrenaline during porcine cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015;120(1):11–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, E, Loiacono, R, Summers, RJ. The rush to adrenaline: drugs in sport acting on the beta-adrenergic system. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;154(3):584–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arrich, J, Sterz, F, Herkner, H, et al. Total epinephrine dose during asystole and pulseless electrical activity cardiac arrests is associated with unfavorable functional outcome and increased in-hospital mortality. Resuscitation. 2012;83(3):333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behringer, W, Kittler, H, Sterz, F, et al. Cumulative epinephrine dose during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and neurologic outcome. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(6):450–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rivers, EP, Wortsman, J, Rady, MY, et al. The effect of the total cumulative epinephrine dose administered during human CPR on hemodynamic, oxygen transport, and utilization variables in the post-resuscitation period. Chest. 1994;106(5):1499–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ng and Teoh supplementary material

Ng and Teoh supplementary material
Download Ng and Teoh supplementary material(File)
File 177.8 KB