Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:09:57.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Ambulance Crew Size Affect On-Scene Time or Number of Prehospital Interventions?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Lawrence H. Brown ,
Charles F. Owens Jr. ,
Juan A. March  and
Elizabeth A. Archino
Lawrence H. Brown*
Affiliation:
East Carolina University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medical Services, Greenville, North Carolina
Charles F. Owens Jr.
Affiliation:
Greenville Fire and Rescue, Greenville, North Carolina
Juan A. March
Affiliation:
East Carolina University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medical Services, Greenville, North Carolina Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Greenville, North Carolina
Elizabeth A. Archino
Affiliation:
Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Greenville, North Carolina
*
East Carolina, University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medical Services, Building M, Physicians' Quadrangle, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

While large cities typically staff ambulances with two emergency medical services (EMS) professionals, some EMS agencies use three people for ambulance crews. The Greenville, North Carolina, EMS agency converted from three-person to two-person EMS crews in July 1993. There are no published reports investigating the best crew size for out-of-hospital emergency care.

Hypothesis:

Two-person EMS crews perform the same number and types of interventions as three-person EMS crews. Two-person EMS crews do not have longer on-scene times than do three-person EMS crews.

Methods:

Data for the two most common advanced life support calls in this system—seizures and chest pains—were collected for the months of June and August 1993. Three-person EMS crews responded to both types of calls in June. In August, two-person EMS crews responded to seizure calls; two-person EMS crews accompanied by a fire department engine (pumper) with additional manpower responded to chest pain calk. The frequency of specific interventions, number of total interventions, and scene times for the August calls were compared to their historical control groups, the June calls.

Results:

One hundred twenty-six patient contacts were included in the study. There were no significant differences in total number or types of procedures performed for the two patient groups. Mean on-scene time for patients with seizures was 11.0±4.2 minutes for three-person crews and 19.4±8.3 minutes for two-person crews (p <0.001). Mean on-scene time for patients with chest pain was 13.6±4.9 minutes for three-person crews, and 15.4±3.2 minutes for two-person crews assisted by fire department personnel (p >0.05).

Conclusion:

Two-person EMS crews perform the same number of procedures as do three-person EMS crews. However, without the assistance of additional responders, two-person EMS crews may have statistically significantly longer onscene times than three-person EMS crews.

Keywords

advanced life supportchest paincrew configurationemergency medical servicesscene timesseizuresstaffingtransportation of patients
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 214 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Staff: EMS providers in America's 200 most populous cities. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 1994;19:101–112.Google Scholar
2. Pollock, MJ, Prasad, NH, Perkins, PK: Pitt County EMS Protocols, 4th rev. Greenville, N.C.: East Carolina University School of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medical Services, 1992, pp 32, 36.Google Scholar
3. SAS Institute Inc., SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6. 4th ed. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute Inc., 1989. pp 1326–1339, 1633-1640.Google Scholar
4. McCloskey, KA, King, WD, Byron, L: Pediatric critical care transport: Is a physician always needed on the team? Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:247–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Baxt, WG, Moody, P: The impact of a physician as part of the aeromedical prehospital team in patients with blunt trauma. JAMA 1987:257:3246–3250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Hamman, BL, Cue, JI, Miller, FB, et al. : Helicopter transport of trauma victims: Does a physician make a difference? J Trauma 1991;31:490–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar