Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T04:39:23.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does Adding Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Centers in a Regional Stroke Care System Affect Procedural Volume?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2025

Juliana Tolles*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center & The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, California USA David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California USA
Jake Toy
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center & The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, California USA David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California USA Los Angeles Emergency Medical Services Agency, Santa Fe Springs, California USA
Patrick Lyden
Affiliation:
Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute of the Keck University School of Medicine at USC, Los Angeles, California USA
Marianne Gausche-Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center & The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, California USA David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California USA
Nichole Bosson
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center & The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, California USA David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California USA Los Angeles Emergency Medical Services Agency, Santa Fe Springs, California USA
*
Correspondence: Juliana Tolles, MD, MHS Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center & The Lundquist Institute 1000 W Carson St.Torrance, California USA 90502 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background:

To maintain procedural proficiency and certification according to the standards set by The Joint Commission—which accredits health care centers in the United States—thrombectomy-capable stroke centers (TSCs) must achieve a minimum annual procedural volume. The addition of thrombectomy-capable centers in a regional stroke care system has the potential to increase access but also to decrease patient presentations and procedural volume at nearby centers. This study sought to characterize the impact of certifying additional thrombectomy-capable centers on procedural volume by center in a large, urban Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system.

Methods:

Data were collected from each designated thrombectomy-capable center in Los Angeles (LA) County from January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2022, during which a net total of five thrombectomy-capable centers were newly designated in the County. Per center volume for ischemic stroke presentations, intravenous (IV) thrombolysis administrations (IV tissue plasminogen activator [tPA]), and thrombectomy were tabulated by six-month interval. Median last-known-well-to-procedure times by LA County Public Health service planning area (SPA) were calculated. The effect of the number of designated centers on procedural volumes per center and median last-known-well-to-procedure times were analyzed via a linear mixed effects model with a log link function.

Results:

Procedural volume, ischemic stroke presentation volume, and last-known-well-to-procedure times had high variability over the time period studied. Nonetheless, the median values for each metric in this EMS system remained largely stable over the study period. There was no statistically significant association between the number of thrombectomy-capable centers and per center procedural volumes or times-to-procedure.

Conclusion:

The designation of additional thrombectomy-capable centers in a regional stroke care system was not significantly associated with the volume of procedures by center or times-to-procedure, suggesting that additional centers may increase patient access to time-sensitive interventions without diluting patient presentations at existing centers.

Type
Innovation Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Powers, WJ, Rabinstein, AA, Ackerson, T, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344e418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, R, Horev, A, Nguyen, T, et al. Higher volume endovascular stroke centers have faster times to treatment, higher reperfusion rates and higher rates of good clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5(4):294297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinaldo, L, Brinjikji, W, Rabinstein, AA. Transfer to high-volume centers associated with reduced mortality after endovascular treatment of acute stroke. Stroke. 2017;48(5):13161321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waqas, M, Tutino, VM, Cappuzzo, JM, et al. Stroke thrombectomy volume, rather than stroke center accreditation status of hospitals, is associated with mortality and discharge disposition. J NeuroInterv Surg. 2023;15(3):209213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, LK, Mocco, J, Fifi, J, Jette, N, Tuhrim, S, Dhamoon, MS. Correlations between physician and hospital stroke thrombectomy volumes and outcomes: a nationwide analysis. Stroke. 2021;52(9):28582865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aldstadt, J, Waqas, M, Yasumiishi, M, et al. Mapping access to endovascular stroke care in the USA and implications for transport models. J Neurointerv Surg. 2022;14(1):neurintsurg-2020-016942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linfante, I, Nogueira, RG, Zaidat, OO, et al. A joint statement from the Neurointerventional Societies: our position on operator experience and training for stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11(6):533534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mack, WJ, Mocco, J, Hirsch, JA, et al. Thrombectomy stroke centers: the current threat to regionalizing stroke care. J NeuroInterv Surg. 2018;10(2):99101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, MH, Kansagra, AP. Changes in patient volumes and outcomes after adding thrombectomy capability. Stroke. 2021;52(6):21432149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosson, N, Gausche-Hill, M, Saver, JL, et al. Increased access to and use of endovascular therapy following implementation of a 2-tiered regional stroke system. Stroke. 2020;51(3):908913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroke Receiving Center Standards Reference No. 322. https://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/dhs/1016600_322-StrokeStandards20170109-signed.pdf. Accessed November 6, 2023.Google Scholar
Stroke Patient Destination Reference No. 521. https://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/dhs/238671_521-7-1-16.pdf. Accessed November 6, 2023.Google Scholar
Joint Commission reinstates individual physician mechanical thrombectomy volume eligibility requirement. The Bulletin. https://bulletin.facs.org/2019/04/joint-commission-reinstates-individual-physician-mechanical-thrombectomy-volume-eligibility-requirement/. Accessed November 6, 2023.Google Scholar