Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:04:31.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dilemma of Neutrality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Jennifer Leaning
Jennifer Leaning*
Affiliation:
Co-Director, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts USA, Professor of the Practice of International Health, Department of Population and International Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
*
Jennifer Leaning, MD, SMH Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, 14 Story Street, 2nd Floor Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper focuses on the dilemma that humanitarian non-governmental organizations (NGOs) face in their efforts to gain access to populations caught up in current wars. Narrow and broad concepts of humanitarian protection are discussed and it is argued that despite high levels of professionalism, the space for humanitarian action has constricted sharply since the events surrounding the attacks of 11 September 2001. Increasingly, aid workers are now being viewed with suspicion as agents of the great powers and assertions of humanitarian neutrality are not heeded or rejected. Non-governmental organizations have evolved a range of options to address this problem, but there is an urgent need to work collectively to find more durable and coherent solutions.

Keywords

dilemmahumanitarianneutralitynon-governmental organization
Type
Special Report
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , October 2007 , pp. 418 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Claendon Press, 1978, Volume II:1398–1399.Google Scholar
2.Biber, B:The code of conduct: Humanitarian principles in practice.20-9-2004. Available at http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/64zahh?opendocument. Accessed 07 September 2006.Google Scholar
3.Krahenbuhl, P: The ICRC's approach to contemporary security challenges: A future for independent and neutral humanitarian action. IRRC 2004;86:505–513.Google Scholar
4.International Federation of Red Cross and Red Cresecent Socities: The seven fundamental principles. Available at http://www.ifrc.org/what/values/ principles. Accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
5.Macrae, J, Bradbury, S, Jaspars, S, et al. : Conflict, the continuum, and chronic emergencies: A critical analysis of the scope for lnking relief, rehabilitation and development planning in Sudan. Disasters 1997;21:223–243.Google Scholar
6.Bruderlein, C, Leaning, J: New challenges for humanitarian protection. BMJ 1999;319:43–45.Google Scholar
7.The Sphere Project: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response. Geneva: The Sphere Project, 2004.Google Scholar
8.International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty: The Responsibility to Protect.Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre, 2001.Google Scholar
9.James, W: The Moral Equivalent of War. Speech given at Stanford, California, 1906.Google Scholar