Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:21:30.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Difficult Discussions: Military Intervention and United Nation Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Frederick M. Burkle Jr.
Frederick M. Burkle Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Sciences and Epidemiology; Director, Asia-Pacific Center for Biosecurity, Disaster and Conflict Research, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Review
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , August 2006 , pp. 286 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Western, J: Doctrinal divisions: The politics of US military interventions. Harvard International Review 2004;26(1):46–50.Google Scholar
2.Hansch, S: Humanitarian Assistance: CSIS-Brookings foreign assistance for the 21st Century Project. Georgetown University Institute for the Study of International Migration, Unpublished data, 2005.Google Scholar
3.Martone, G: Guidelines for interaction with military and belligerent parties. International Rescue Committee, Draft document (08 April 2003):1–8.Google Scholar
4.Evans, G, Sahnoun, M: The responsibility to protect. Foreign Affairs 2002;81(6):99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar