Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:29:07.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

COVID, Co-Ventilation, and Cross-contamination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Jonathan McMahon
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA
Donald Doukas
Affiliation:
New York City Health and Hospitals Kings County, Brooklyn, USA
Christopher Hanuscin
Affiliation:
New York City Health and Hospitals Kings County, Brooklyn, USA
John Quale
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA New York City Health and Hospitals Kings County, Brooklyn, USA
Julie Eason
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA
Habtamu Asrat
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA
Isha Bhatt
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA
Mark Silverberg
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA New York City Health and Hospitals Kings County, Brooklyn, USA
Lorenzo Paladino
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA New York City Health and Hospitals Kings County, Brooklyn, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, consideration was given to co-ventilating multiple patients on a single ventilator. Prior work had shown that this procedure was possible by ventilating four adult-size sheep for twenty-four hours, and other groups had performed this maneuver during dire circumstances. However, no investigation had examined the safety regarding cross-contamination. The purpose of our studies was to investigate if an infection could spread between individuals who were being co-ventilated.

Method:

Four sterile two-liter anesthesia bags were connected to a sterilized ventilator circuit to simulate the co-ventilated patients’ “lungs.” The circuit utilized Heat and Moisture Exchange filters and bacterial/viral filters, which were strategically inserted to prevent the transmission of infectious droplets. Serratia marcescens was inoculated into “lung” number one. The circuit was then run for 24 hours, after which each “lung” and three additional points in the circuit were cultured to see if S. marcescens had spread. These cultures were examined at 24 and 48 hours to assess for cross-contamination. This entire procedure was performed a total of four times.

Results:

S. marcescens was not identified in lungs two, three, or four or the three additional sampling sites on the expiratory limb of the tubing at 24 and 48 hours in all four trials.

Conclusion:

Cross-contamination between co-ventilated patients did not occur within 24 hours utilizing the described ventilator circuit configuration.

Type
Lightning and Oral Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine