Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T01:40:43.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Characterization of the Burden from Mandated COVID-19 Public Health Reporting on a Small Independent Hospital in New York City

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Pia Daniel
Affiliation:
Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, USA
Bonnie Arquilla
Affiliation:
Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, USA
Patricia Roblin
Affiliation:
Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, USA
David Kaufman
Affiliation:
Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, USA
Kenrick Cato
Affiliation:
Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, USA
Yalini Senathirajah
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Public health agencies’ ability to monitor outbreaks requires government mandated reporting from healthcare institutions, with consequences for noncompliance. This study aims to characterize the burden on acute care hospitals from government reporting requirements during COVID-19 pandemic.

Method:

A retrospective study over a 14-month period (April 27th, 2020 to June 10th, 2021) during the COVID-19 pandemic examining the log of changes and requirements of the Health and Human Services (HHS) Teletracking, an online system for hospital reporting. We interviewed 33 individuals including hospital leadership, clinical directors, and infection control personnel in a New York City (NYC) small independent hospital (SIH).

Results:

During the study period, reporting requirements increased from five daily reports to 29 daily reports across eleven different agencies, all with separate reporting systems. Reporting schedules varied from several times a day to intermittently. Typically, new reporting requirements were conveyed to institutional contacts at 8 AM with a required deadline of 1 PM the same day. The continuous changes reportedly made it difficult to develop stable data gathering and workflow processes. There was a reported lack of clarity around new data elements’ definitions and different agencies employed different variables for the same measure. There were hospital penalties for missing deadlines, leading to clinical staff being diverted from patient care to meet reporting needs.

Conclusion:

The study shows significant reporting barriers and diversion of resources away from the frontline to supply data collection during disasters. There is significant redundancy in reporting agencies and in reporting systems, each with different reporting frequencies, and variable definitions of data elements. The public health needs of a disaster response would be better served with a more coordinated, efficient system to share information without further straining the healthcare system.

Type
Lightning and Oral Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine