Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:46:55.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anesthesia in the Field (Discussion to the Previous Papers in Section Six)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Jiri Pokorny
Affiliation:
From the Department of Anesthesiology, University Pediatric Hospital, Motol-Prague, Czechoslovakia.

Extract

A major man-made disaster, like a nuclear attack, may suddenly reduce a highly developed country to very primitive conditions. The choice of anesthetics for the field depends on medical suitability, but, primarily upon a country's production possibilities in disaster conditions. Simple anesthesiological procedures must be preferred. Provisions are to be made for ketamine, atropine, narcotics (pethidine, morphine), in order to make possible intravenous/intramuscular anesthesia. For inhalation anesthesia, diethylether with a simple inhalation anesthesia apparatus is needed. Ether remains important for disaster conditions, because of its relative safety in less experienced hands and because its production is both cheap and simple. When possible, self-administered inhalation analgesia with methoxyflurane would greatly help to alleviate the suffering of the seriously wounded. In Czechoslovakia inhalation of methoxyflurane (AnecotanSPofA) from a simple “Analgizer” (vaporizer) proved to be of greatest help in mine casualties and in traffic accidents, before extrication of the casualties. As long as ether is considered as the “anesthetic for the field” it remains necessary to keep young anesthetists informed and skilled in ether anesthesia.

Type
Part II: Clinical Care Topics
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)