Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:42:18.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Eight-Year Review of Legal Cases Related to an Urban 9-1-1 Paramedic Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Brian J. Maguire  and
Frank V. Porco
Brian J. Maguire*
Affiliation:
The George Washington University
Frank V. Porco
Affiliation:
Staten Island University Hospital
*
The George Washington, University EMS Degree Program, 2300 K Street, NW, Suite 10, Washington, DC 20037USA, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

An eight year retrospective analysis was conducted to determine the type and outcome of lawsuits related to the provision of 9-1-1 paramedic service in an urban environment.

Methods:

For the evaluation period of May 1986 to March 1994, all litigation cases related to Ambulance Service or paramedics were collected and analyzed. This urban 9-1-1 Paramedic Service has an estimated call volume of >60,000 assignments resulting in >30,000 patient encounters during the evaluation period.

Results:

Seven lawsuits were filed against the service. No lawsuits were related to tardy response, failure to transport, or patient care negligence of any kind. All of the litigation was related to motor vehicle collisions (MVC).

Conclusion:

The data suggest that motor vehicle collisions are a significant medicallegal risk to the EMS community. In addition, it was found that the use and lack of use of seatbelts was an important component in many of the suits.

Keywords

accident preventionambulance accidentEMS litigationinjury preventionlawsuitsseatbeltsurban EMS
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 83 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Soler, JM, Montes, MF, Egol, AB et al. : The ten-year malpractice experience of a large urban EMS system. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:982–985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Goldberg, RJ, Zautcke, JL, Koenigsberg, MD et al. : A review of prehospital litigation in a large metropolitan EMS system. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:557–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Larmon, B, LeGassickTF, Schriger, DL: Differential front and back seat safety belt use by prehospital care providers. Amer J Emerg Med 1993;11:595–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Auerbach, PS, Morris, JA, Phillips, JB Jr. et al. : An analysis of ambulance accidents in Tennessee. JAMA 1984;258:1487–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Elling, R: Dispelling myths on ambulance accidents. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 1989;11:60–64.Google Scholar
6. Cook, RT, Meador, SA, Buckingham, BD, Groff, LV: Opportunity for seatbelt usage by ALS providers. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1991;6:469–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Reath, DB, Kirby, J, Lynch, M, Maull, K: Injury and cost comparison of restrained and unrestrained motor vehicle crash victims. J Trauma 1989;29:1173–1177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Zador, PL, Ciccone, MA: Automobile driver fatalities in frontal impacts: Air bags compared with manual belts. Am J of Pub Health 1993;83:661–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed