Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T08:43:29.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Airports in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2017

P. Dürner
Affiliation:
German Air Rescue, Stuttgart West Germany
B. Domres
Affiliation:
Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Tubingen, West Germany
R. Heinrich
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Tubingen, West Germany

Extract

Up to 1980, the important European airports and European airlines increased the number of their flights and passengers. As a result, it has been necessary to develop and launch airplanes with a high passenger capacity (e.g., Boeing 747, Jumbo, with 270 seats; Douglas DC 10 with 265 seats; and the Airbus A 300 with 249 seats). Simultaneously, the airports had to be enlarged or even rebuilt. After this substantial investment, the number of passengers began to decrease. In 1981, the French airline “Air France” expected a deficit of about 65 million DM (29.5 million US dollars), excluding the deficit by Concord. For the first time in 18 years, the Scandinavian airline “SAS” in 1980 had a deficit. The German airline “Lufthansa” expects no profits in 1981. This situation has been caused by rising oil prices, decreasing numbers of passengers, and a general recession. Many airlines have been reducing prices to attract more passengers. In spite of the high investments in new airplanes and modernizing airports, there has been little improvement in the necessary air- and ground-control-systems.

In April 1981, the International Associates of Pilots (IFALPA) graded the security of air- and ground-control-systems of German airports as follows: deficient — Frankfurt and Bremen; seriously deficient — Hamburg, Stuttgart and Saarbrücken. According to the security scale of the IFALPA, the most important airports in the Mediterranean area were surveyed and estimated in 1977/78 as follows: deficient — Los Rodeos (Canary Islands), Las Palmas (Canary Islands), Lisbon, Faro, Malaga, Alicante, Madrid, Gerona, Ibiza, Palma de Mallorca, Venice and Roma; and critically deficient — Alghero, Rimini, Naples.

Type
Section Two—Organization and Preparation
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Domres, B. Surgical care of patients in aeroplane and airport disasters. Presentation at International Symposium on Aeroplane and Airport Disaster, 27–28.3.1981, Mainz (FRG).Google Scholar
2 Bergot, GP. Airport Disaster Management. Presentation: Presentation at International Symposium on Aeroplane and Airport Disaster, 27–28.3.1981, Mainz (FRG).Google Scholar
3 Meyer, M. Planning principles for medical care in catastrophes. In, Frey, R, Safar, P (eds). Disaster Medicine. Types and events of disasters, organization in various disaster situations. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar
4 Tarrow, AB. Philadelphia International Airport disaster exercise in 1975 and 1977, Disaster Medicine. Types and events of disasters, organization in various disaster situations. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar