Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:26:19.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Waterworks, a Full-Scale Chemical Exposure Exercise: Interrogating Pediatric Critical Care Surge Capacity in an Inner-City Tertiary Care Medical Center

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2013

Vikas S. Shah*
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York USA Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York USA
Lauren C. Pierce
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois USA
Patricia Roblin
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York USA
Sarah Walker
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York USA
Marte N. Sergio
Affiliation:
Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York USA
Bonnie Arquilla
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York USA Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York USA
*
Correspondence: Vikas S. Shah, MD Downstate Medical Center 440 Lennox Road, Suite 2M Brooklyn, New York 11203 USA E-mail [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) resources are overwhelmed in disaster as the need to accommodate influx of critically-ill children is increased. A full-scale chlorine overexposure exercise was conducted by the New York Institute for All Hazard Preparedness (NYIAHP) to assess the appropriateness of response of Kings County Hospital Center's (KCHC's) PICU surge plan to an influx of critically-ill children. The primary endpoint that was assessed was the ability of the institution to follow the PICU surge plan, while secondary endpoints include the ability to provide appropriate medical management.

Methods

Thirty-six actors/patients (medical students or emergency medicine residents) were educated on presentations and appropriate medical management of patients after a chlorine overexposure, as well as lectures on drill design and expected PICU surge response. Victims presented to the hospital after simulated accidental chlorine overexposure at a public pool. Twenty-two patients with 14 family members needed evaluation; nine of these patients would require PICU admission. Three of nine PICU patients were low-fidelity mannequins. In addition to the 36 actor/patient evaluators, each area had two to four expert evaluators (disaster preparedness experts) to assess appropriateness of global response. Patients were expected to receive standard of care. Appropriateness of medical decisions and treatment was assessed retrospectively with review of electronic medical record.

Results

The initial PICU census was three of seven; two of these patients were transferred to the general ward. Of the nine patients that required Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, six actor/patients were admitted to the PICU, one was admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU), one went to the Operating Room (OR), and one was admitted to a monitored-surge general pediatric bed. The remaining 13 actor/patients were treated and released. Medical, nursing, and respiratory staffing in the PICU and the general ward were increased by two main mechanisms (extension of work hours and in-house recruitment of additional staff). Emergency Department (ED) staffing was artificially increased prior to the drill. With the exception of ocular fluid pH testing in patients with ocular pruritus, all necessary treatments were given; however, an unneeded albuterol treatment was administered to one patient. Chart review showed adequate discharge instructions in four of 13 patients. Nine patients without respiratory complaints in the ED were not instructed to observe for dyspnea. All patients were in the PICU or alternate locations within 90 minutes.

Discussion

The staff was well versed in the major details of KCHC's PICU surge plan, which allowed smooth transition of patient care from the ED to the PICU. The plan provided for a roadmap to achieve adequate medical, nursing, and respiratory therapists. Medical therapy was appropriate in the PICU; however, in the ED, patients with ocular complaints did not receive optimal care. In addition, written discharge instruction and educational material regarding chlorine overexposure to all patients were not consistently provided. The PICU surge plan was immediately accessible through the KCHC intranet; however, not all participants were cognizant of this fact; this decreased the efficiency with which the roadmap was followed. An exaggerated ED staff facilitated evaluation and transfer of patients.

Conclusion

During disasters, the ability to surge is paramount and each hospital addresses it differently. Hospitals and departments have written surge plans, but there is no literature available which assesses the validity of said plans through a rigorous, structured, simulated disaster drill. This study is the first to assess validity and effectiveness of a hospital's PICU surge plan. Overall, the KCHC PICU surge plan was effective; however, several deficiencies (mainly in communication and patient education in the ED) were identified, and this will improve future response.

ShahVS, PierceLC, RoblinP, WalkerS, SergioMN, ArquillaB. Waterworks, a Full-Scale Chemical Exposure Exercise: Interrogating Pediatric Critical Care Surge Capacity in an Inner-City Tertiary Care Medical Center. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(1):1-7.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Campbell, C. The Pediatric Resource and Emergency Preparedness Initiative, PICU Phase. http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/bhpp/hepp-epc-prepcampbell-011608.pdf. Accessed January 11, 2012.Google Scholar
2. Demographic data of Kings County. New York City: 2010 Census Stats. http://censtats.census.gov/cgi-bin/usac/usatable.pl. Accessed January 15, 2012.Google Scholar
3. Health Care at the Crossroads: Strategies for Creating and Sustaining Community-wide Emergency Preparedness Systems. http://thejointcomission.org. Accessed January 15, 2012.Google Scholar
4. Bowen, AB, Kile, JC, Otto, C, et al. Outbreaks of short-incubation ocular and respiratory illness following exposure to indoor swimming pools. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115(2):267-271.Google Scholar
5. Vohra, R, Clark, R. Chlorine-related inhalation injury from a swimming pool disinfectant in a 9-year-old girl. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22(4):254-257.Google Scholar
6. Lehavi, O, Leiba, A, Dahan, Y, et al. Lessons learned from chlorine intoxications in swimming pools: the challenge of pediatric mass toxicological events. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(1):90-95.Google Scholar
7. Agabiti, N, Ancona, C, Forastiere, F, et al. Short term respiratory effects of acute exposure to chlorine due to a swimming pool accident. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58(6):399-404.Google Scholar
8. Kaydos-Daniels, SC, Beach, MJ, Shwe, T, Magri, J, Bixler, D. Health effects associated with indoor swimming pools: a suspected toxic chloramine exposure. Public Health. 2008;122(2):195-200.Google Scholar
9. Babu, RV, Cardenas, V, Sharma, G. Acute respiratory distress syndrome from chlorine inhalation during a swimming pool accident: a case report and review of the literature. J Intensive Care Med. 2008;23(4):275-280.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Shah et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Shah et al. Supplementary Material(File)
File 55.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Shah et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Shah et al. Supplementary Material(File)
File 234.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Shah et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Shah et al. Supplementary Material(File)
File 305.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Shah et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Shah et al. Supplementary Material(File)
File 197.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Shah et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Shah et al. Supplementary Material(File)
File 223.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Shah et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Shah et al. Supplementary Material(File)
File 72.7 KB