Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:00:29.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sonomatic Confirmation of Tracheal Intubation Using the SCOTI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Georg Petroianu ,
Wolfgang Maleck ,
Wolfgang Bergler  and
Roderich Rüfer
Georg Petroianu*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, University of Heidelberg at Mannheim, Germany
Wolfgang Maleck
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Ludwigshafen City Hospital, Germany
Wolfgang Bergler
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Heidelberg at Mannheim, Germany
Roderich Rüfer
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, University of Heidelberg at Mannheim, Germany
*
Department of Pharmacology, University of Heidelberg at Mannheim, Maybach Str. 14–16, 68169 Mannheim, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study compares the performance of two commercially available devices (Ambu. TubeChek™ and SCOTI™ in establishing endotracheal (ET) tube position (oesophageal vs. tracheal) in a mannequin and in miniature pigs. The Ambu TubeChek is a syringe-type, Oesophageal Detector Device (ODD) that fits to the endotracheal tube connector. Air is aspirated easily from the rigid trachea, but not from the collapsing esophagus. The Sonomatic Confirmation of Tracheal Intubation device (SCOTI) is a lightweight battery-powered, sonomatic device. It emits sound waves into the tube and analyzes the reflection. The SCOTI purports to enable a user-independent and carbon-dioxide-independent assessment of tube position following intubation.

Intubation followed by tube position assessment with Ambu TubeChek (ODD) was significantly faster and easier with the ODD than with the SCOTI. The SCOTI cannot differentiate tracheal from oesophageal ET-tube position in mini-pigs.

In situations in which capnometry is not available or the CO2 production and transport are compromised (CPR), we recommend the use of an Oesophageal Detector Device (ODD) rather than the SOCTI.

Keywords

Ambu TubeChekoesophageal detector deviceintubationoesophagealSCOTItube position
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 78 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Benumof, JL: The ASA diificult airway algorithm: New thoughts and considerations. In: Annual Refresher Course Lectures 1995. Annual Meeting of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists, Atlanta. Abstract.Google Scholar
2. Birmingham, PK, Cheney, FW, Ward, RJ: Esophageal intubation: A review of detection techniques. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1986;65:886–891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Caplan, RA, Posner, KL, Ward, RJ, Cheney, FW: Adverse respiratory events in anaesthesia: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 1990;72:828–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Clyburn, P, Rosen, M: Accidental oesophageal intubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1994;73:55–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Tinker, JH, Dull, DL, Caplan, RA: Role of monitoring devices in prevention of anesthetic mishaps: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 1989;71:541–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Petroianu, G: Überprüfung der Tubuslage: Sichere “unsichere” Methoden und neuere Entwicklungen. Anaesthesist 1991;40:356–357.Google Scholar
7. Petroianu, G: Überprüfung der Tubuslage mit einem nichtquantitätiven CO2 Detektor. Anaesthesist 1993;42:324–325.Google Scholar
8. Petroianu, GA, Maleck, WH: Detection of an oesophageal intubation: “State-of-the-art.” Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1994;22:744–746.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Pollard, BJ: A test to verify accurate placement of an endotracheal tube. World Congress of Anaesthesiology, 1980 Hamburg; Abstract 1112 Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica, International Congress Series. Abstract.Google Scholar
10. Pollard, BJ: Oesophageal detector device. Anaesthesia 1988;43:713–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Wee, MYK: The oesophageal detector device: assessment of a new method to distinguish oesophageal from tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1988;43:27–29.Google Scholar
12. Nunn, JF: The oesophageal detector device. Anaesthesia 1988;43:804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Williams, KN, Nunn, JF: The oesophageal detector device: A prospective trial in 100 patients. Anaesthesia 1989;44:412–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Petroianu, GA, Maleck, W, Bergler, W et al. : Praklinische Kontrolle von Tubuslage und Beatmung. Anaesthesist 1995;44:613–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Jenkins, WA, Verdile, VP, Paris, PM: The syringe aspiration technique. Am J Emerg Med 1994;12:413–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Mansfield, JP, Lyle, RP, Voorhees, WD, W Odicka, GR: An acoustical guidance and position monitoring system for endotracheal tubes. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1993;40:1330–1335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Leon, W, Riopelle, J, Akerson, H: Sonometric confirmation of tracheal intubation: A new technique and medical device. Scientific Exhibits, American Society of Anesthesiologists Annual Meeting; San Francisco, 1994.Google Scholar
18. Riopelle, J, Akerson, H, Leon, W: Comparison of 2 modes of operation of a new sonometric device designed to rapidly distinguish tracheal from esophageal intubation: A laboratory study using porcine organs. Anesthesiology 1994;81S:A622, Abstract.Google Scholar
19. Murray, D, Ward, ME, Sear, JW: SCOTI: A new device for identification of tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1995;50:1062–1064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Petroianu, G, Rüfer, R: Zero-stress-anaesthesia-induction (ZESTRANI) in mini-pigs: A five year experience in 200 (plus) pigs. 5th International Congress of Veterinary Anesthesia 1994, University of Guelph, Canada.Google Scholar
21. Wee, MYK, Walker, AKY: The oesophageal detector device: An assessment with uncuffed tubes in children. Anaesthesia 1991;46:869–871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Morton, NS, Stuart, JC, Thomson, MF, Wee, MYK: The oesophageal detector device: Successful use in children. Anaesthesia 1989;44:523–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Haynes, SR, Morton, NS: Use of the oesophageal detector device in children under one year of age. Anaesthesia 1990;45:1067–1069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed