Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:42:48.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Requiring On-Line Medical Command for Helicopter Request Prolongs Computer-Modeled Transport Time to the Nearest Trauma Center

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Bartholomew J. Tortella ,
Robert F. Lavery ,
Mihir Kamat  and
Mohnish Ramani
Bartholomew J. Tortella*
Affiliation:
New Jersey Trauma & Emergency Medical Services Research Center, UMDNJ-University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Section of Trauma and Emergency Medical Services UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
Robert F. Lavery
Affiliation:
New Jersey Trauma & Emergency Medical Services Research Center, UMDNJ-University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Section of Trauma and Emergency Medical Services
Mihir Kamat
Affiliation:
UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
Mohnish Ramani
Affiliation:
UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
*
University Hospital, Rm. J-200, 150 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07103-2406, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Rapid transport from scene to closest trauma center requires optimal use of public safety first responder (FR), basic life support (BLS), advanced life support (ALS), and transport resources (ground or air). In some parts of this regional emergency medical services (EMS) system, on-scene ALS requires contact with on-line medical command (OLMC) to obtain authorization for air medical helicopter (AMH) dispatch, because some EMS medical directors believe that this may decrease overutilization of AMH services.

Hypothesis:

The hypothesis of this study was that requiring prior OLMC for AMH dispatch prolongs mean time to a trauma center versus either FR or BLS request for AMH.

Methods:

Computer mapping programs were used to model the most rapid driving time to the closest trauma center from 167 actual AMH responses to the scene of a motor vehicle accident. In an OLMC-ALS model, only OLMC-ALS can request an AMH. In a BLS model, BLS units arrive on the scene and the crew requests simultaneous dispatch of an ALS response and an AMH. In the FR model, on arrival at the scene, a FR requests simultaneous dispatch of a BLS unit, an ALS unit, and an AMH.

Results:

The OLMC-ALS model resulted in a longer mean value for time to trauma center by an AMH than did the computer model for all ground transport settings. The FR model yielded a shorter mean time for AMH compared with the mean values for time to trauma center for all settings. Differences in mean values for time in urban settings were small (ground: 42 minutes, air: 36 minutes), whereas those for the suburban (ground: 52 minutes, air: 41 minutes), and those for rural (ground: 69 minutes, air: 47 minutes) were significant clinically. For the BLS model, these differences persisted, but were significant clinically only in the rural setting (ground: 68 minutes, air: 53 minutes).

Conclusions:

Optimal use of AMH requires balancing the need for early helicopter dispatch to fully exploit its speed advantage with the disadvantage of expensive overutilization. This computer model indicates that the best person to request AMH varies by venue: in urban settings, the OLMC physician should request AMH dispatch; in suburban venues, BLS should request AMH dispatch; and in rural venues, FRs should request AMH dispatch.

Keywords

advanced life supportair medical helicopteremergency medical serviceson-line medical commandtransport
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 261 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Malawian, JA, Fitzpatrick, KT, Beyer, AJ, et al. : Factors improving survival in multisystem trauma patients. Ann Surg 1987;122:992–996.Google Scholar
2. Burney, RE, Fischer, RP: Ground versus air transport of trauma victims: Medical and logistical considerations. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15:1491–1495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Cowley, RA, Hudson, F, Scanlon, E, et al. : An economical improved helicopter program for transporting the emergency, critically ill, injured patients in Maryland. J Trauma 1976;16:452–463.Google Scholar
4. Gabram, SGA, Jacobs, LM: The impact of emergency medical helicopters on pre-hospital care. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1990;8:85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Rhodes, M, Perline, R, Aronson, J, Rappe, A: Field triage for on-scene helicopter transport. J Trauma 1976;16:452–463.Google Scholar
6. McKenzie, C, Shin, B, Cowley, RA: Comparison of deaths, clinical status, and duration of helicopter or ambulance transport following motor vehicle accidents. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1986;2:199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Baxt, WG, Moody, P: The impact of a rotor-craft aeromedical emergency care service on trauma mortality. JAMA 1983;249:3047–3051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Burney, RE: Efficacy, cost, and safety of hospital based emergency aeromedical programs. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:227–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Tortella, BJ, Salant, M, Lavery, RF, Cody, R.: Standing orders for field intravenous lines d o no t shorten prehospital time in trauma patients. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1992;7:271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Spaite, DW, Valenzuela, TD, Meislin, HW, et al. : Prospective validation of a new model for evaluating emergency medical service systems by in-field observation of specific time intervals in prehospital care. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:638–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Fischer, RP, Flynn, TC, Miller, PW, et al. : Urban helicopter response to the scene of injury. J Trauma 1984;24:946–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Schiller, WR, Knox, R, Zinnecker, H, et al. : Effect of helicopter transport of trauma victims on survival in an urban trauma center. J Trauma 1988;528:1127–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar