Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:22:23.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizing Health Care Services for the 2017 “Athens Marathon, The Authentic:” Perspectives on Collaboration among Health and Safety Personnel in the Marathon Command Center

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2019

Angeliki Bistaraki Open the ORCID record for Angeliki Bistaraki [Opens in a new window] ,
Konstantinos Georgiadis  and
Demetrios G. Pyrros
Angeliki Bistaraki*
Affiliation:
University of Peloponnese, Sparta, Greece
Konstantinos Georgiadis
Affiliation:
University of Peloponnese, Sparta, Greece
Demetrios G. Pyrros
Affiliation:
National Centre of Emergency Care (EKAB), Athens, Greece
*
Correspondence: Angeliki Bistaraki, BSc, MSc, PhD74 Dinostratou Str.11743, Athens, Greece E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Mass gatherings pose unique challenges for interorganizational collaboration. The “Athens Marathon, The Authentic” is a 42,195m (26.2mile) race with approximately 18,000 runners that increases annually. On the same day, additional races take place and a grand total of more than 50,000 runners fill the city center of Athens, Greece. Responding effectively to unexpected incidents requires comprehensive planning, clear decision-making structure, and effective collaboration. Nonetheless, there is limited empirical evidence to support interagency collaboration in mass gatherings.

Purpose:

This study used the 2017 Athens Marathon and related races as the empirical setting to examine how interagency collaboration was perceived among the multiple public health and safety professionals involved in the marathon command center.

Methods:

Data comprised 10 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with key informants, direct observations of meetings and the event itself, and documentary analysis. Open coding and thematic analysis were used to analyze the data.

Results:

Findings indicated four key components of interagency collaboration in such an event: organizational culture, team synthesis, on-site spatial planning, and the usage of radio-amateurs.

Conclusion:

This study outlined the factors that shaped interagency collaboration in the context of a mass event. Practical implications arising from this study may inform the ways organizers of marathons and other mass sporting events can engage in effective partnerships and joint working.

Keywords

command centerhealth care servicesinteragency collaborationmarathonsmass gatherings
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 34 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 467 - 472
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Flabouris, A, Nocera, A, Garner, A. Efficacy of critical incident monitoring for evaluating disaster medical readiness and response during the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004;19(2):164–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meehan, P, Toomey, KE, Drinnon, J, Cunningham, S, Anderson, N, Baker, E. Public health response for the 1996 Olympic Games. JAMA. 1998;279(18):1469–1473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, RB, Milsten, AM, Cushman, JT. Injury patterns and levels of care at a marathon. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(6):519–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grange, JT. Planning for large events. Curr Sports Med Reports. 2002;1(3):156–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, CM, Tan, IW, Kok, WL, Lee, MC, Lee, VJ. Medical planning for mass-participation running events: a 3-year review of a half-marathon in Singapore. BMC Pub Health. 2014;14(1):1109–1115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turris, SA, Lund, A, Mui, J, Wang, P, Lewis, K, Gutman, SJ. An organized medical response for the Vancouver International Marathon (2006–2011): when the rubber hits the road. Curr Sports Med Reports. 2014;13(3):147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basdere, M, Ross, C, Chan, JL, Mehrotra, S, Smilowitz, K, Chiampas, G. Acute incident rapid response at a mass-gathering event through comprehensive planning systems: a case report from the 2013 Shamrock Shuffle. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(3):320–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, J, Rixe, JA, Spurkeland, N, Brady, J, Silvis, M, Olympia, RP. Medical and disaster preparedness of US marathons. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(4):344–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enock, KE, Jacobs, J. Olympic, The and Games, Paralympic 2012: literature review of the logistical planning and operational challenges for public health. Public Health. 2008;122(11):1229–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsouros, AD, Efstathiou, PA. Mass Gatherings and Public Health: The Experience of the Athens 2004 Olympic Games. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2007.Google Scholar
Bistaraki, A, McKeown, E, Kyratsis, Y. Leading interagency planning and collaboration in mass gatherings: public health and safety in the 2012 London Olympics. Public Health. 2019;166:19–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creswell, J. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. 2nd ed. London, United Kingdom: Sage; 2007.Google Scholar
Stake, RE. “Case studies.” In: Denzin, N, Lincoln, Y (eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London, United Kingdom: Sage; 2000:435–454.Google Scholar
Yin, RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California USA: Sage; 1994.Google Scholar
Denzin, NK, Lincoln, YS. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California USA: Sage; 2000.Google Scholar
Yin, RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. London, UK: Sage; 2009.Google Scholar
Merriam, SB. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. 2nd ed. San Francisco, California USA: Jossey-Bass; 2009.Google Scholar
Crabtree, BF, Miller, WL. “Using codes and code manuals: a template organizing style of interpretation.” In: Crabtree, BF, Miller, WL (eds). Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, California USA: Sage; 1999:163–177.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, T, Kuisma, M, Maatta, T, et al. Prehospital emergency care and medical preparedness for the 2005 World Championship Games in Athletics in Helsinki. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(4):304–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeitz, K, Zeitz, C, Arbon, P, Cheney, F, Johnston, R, Hennekam, J. Practical solutions for injury surveillance at mass gatherings. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(1):76–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milsten, A, Maguire, B, Bissell, R, Seaman, K. Mass-gathering medical care: a review of the literature. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002;17(3):151–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Memish, ZA, Al-Rabeeah, AA. Public health management of mass gatherings: the Saudi Arabian experience with MERS-CoV. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanken, T, Young, S, Smilowitz, K, Chiampas, G, Waskowski, D. Developing a data visualization system for the Bank of America Chicago Marathon (Chicago, Illinois USA). Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(5):572–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, DM, Chiampas, GT, Malik, S, Cole, K, Lindeman, P, Adams, JG. Enhancing community disaster resilience through mass sporting events. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(4):310–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiampas, G, Jaworski, CA. Preparing for the surge: perspectives on marathon medical preparedness. Curr Sports Med Reports. 2009;8(3):131–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, MB, Huberman, M. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. 2nd ed. Beverly Hills, California USA: Sage; 1994.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California USA: Sage; 2002.Google Scholar
Guba, EG, Lincoln, YS. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, California USA: Sage; 1989.Google Scholar
Marshall, B, Cardon, P, Poddar, A, Fontenot, R. Does sample size matter in qualitative research? A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. J Comp Info Syst. 2013;54(1):11–22.Google Scholar