Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:09:55.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Modified Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment Algorithm from the New York City (USA) Fire Department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2015

Faizan H. Arshad ,
Alan Williams ,
Glenn Asaeda ,
Douglas Isaacs ,
Bradley Kaufman ,
David Ben-Eli ,
Dario Gonzalez ,
John P. Freese ,
Joan Hillgardner  and
Jessica Weakley
...Show all authors
Faizan H. Arshad
Affiliation:
Fire Department of the City of New York, Office of Medical Affairs, Brooklyn, New York USA
Alan Williams
Affiliation:
Fire Department of the City of New York, Office of Medical Affairs, Brooklyn, New York USA
Glenn Asaeda
Affiliation:
Fire Department of the City of New York, Office of Medical Affairs, Brooklyn, New York USA
Douglas Isaacs
Affiliation:
Fire Department of the City of New York, Office of Medical Affairs, Brooklyn, New York USA
Bradley Kaufman
Affiliation:
Fire Department of the City of New York, Office of Medical Affairs, Brooklyn, New York USA
David Ben-Eli
Affiliation:
Fire Department of the City of New York, Office of Medical Affairs, Brooklyn, New York USA
Dario Gonzalez
Affiliation:
Fire Department of the City of New York, Office of Medical Affairs, Brooklyn, New York USA
John P. Freese
Affiliation:
Fire Department of the City of New York, Office of Medical Affairs, Brooklyn, New York USA
Joan Hillgardner
Affiliation:
Fire Department of the City of New York, Office of Medical Affairs, Brooklyn, New York USA
Jessica Weakley
Affiliation:
Fire Department of the City of New York, Office of Medical Affairs, Brooklyn, New York USA Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Bronx, New York USA
Charles B. Hall
Affiliation:
Fire Department of the City of New York, Office of Medical Affairs, Brooklyn, New York USA Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Bronx, New York USA Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Bronx, New YorkUSA
Mayris P. Webber
Affiliation:
Fire Department of the City of New York, Office of Medical Affairs, Brooklyn, New York USA Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Bronx, New York USA Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Bronx, New YorkUSA
David J. Prezant*
Affiliation:
Fire Department of the City of New York, Office of Medical Affairs, Brooklyn, New York USA Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Bronx, New York USA Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Division, Bronx, New YorkUSA
*
Correspondence: David J. Prezant, MD Chief Medical Officer Fire Department of the City of New York 9 Metrotech Center (room 8N-7) Brooklyn, New York 11201 USA E-mail [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

The objective of this study was to determine if modification of the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) system by the addition of an Orange category, intermediate between the most critically injured (Red) and the non-critical, non-ambulatory injured (Yellow), would reduce over- and under-triage rates in a simulated mass-casualty incident (MCI) exercise.

Methods

A computer-simulation exercise of identical presentations of an MCI scenario involving a 2-train collision, with 28 case scenarios, was provided for triaging to two groups: the Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY; n = 1,347) using modified START, and the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers from the Eagles 2012 EMS conference (Lafayette, Louisiana USA; n = 110) using unmodified START. Percent correct by triage category was calculated for each group. Performance was then compared between the two EMS groups on the five cases where Orange was the correct answer under the modified START system.

Results

Overall, FDNY-EMS providers correctly triaged 91.2% of cases using FDNY-START whereas non-FDNY-Eagles providers correctly triaged 87.1% of cases using unmodified START. In analysis of the five Orange cases (chest pain or dyspnea without obvious trauma), FDNY-EMS performed significantly better using FDNY-START, correctly triaging 86.3% of cases (over-triage 1.5%; under-triage 12.2%), whereas the non-FDNY-Eagles group using unmodified START correctly triaged 81.5% of cases (over-triage 17.3%; under-triage 1.3%), a difference of 4.9% (95% CI, 1.5-8.2).

Conclusions

The FDNY-START system may allow providers to prioritize casualties using an intermediate category (Orange) more properly aligned to meet patient needs, and as such, may reduce the rates of over-triage compared with START. The FDNY-START system decreases the variability in patient sorting while maintaining high field utility without needing computer assistance or extensive retraining. Comparison of triage algorithms at actual MCIs is needed; however, initial feedback is promising, suggesting that FDNY-START can improve triage with minimal additional training and cost.

ArshadFH, WilliamsA, AsaedaG, IsaacsD, KaufmanB, Ben-EliD, GonzalezD, FreeseJP, HillgardnerJ, WeakleyJ, HallCB, WebberMP, PrezantDJ. A Modified Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment Algorithm from the New York City (USA) Fire Department. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(2):1-6.

Keywords

assessmentdisasterEmergency Medical Servicesmass-casualty incidentsimulationtriage
Type
Brief Report
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 199 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sandell, JM, Maconochie, IK, Jewkes, F. Prehospital paediatric emergency care: paediatric triage. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(11):767-768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Sasser, S. Field triage in disasters. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10(3):322-323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Kluger, Y. Bomb explosions in acts of terrorism--detonation, wound ballistics, triage and medical concerns. Isr Med Assoc J. 2003;5(4):235-240.Google Scholar
4. Super, G. START: A Triage Training Module. Newport Beach, California USA: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian; 1984.Google Scholar
5. Benson, M, Koenig, KL, Schultz, CH. Disaster triage: START, then SAVE-a new method of dynamic triage for victims of a catastrophic earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1996;11(2):117-124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Garner, A, Lee, A, Harrison, K, Schultz, CH. Comparative analysis of multiple-casualty incident triage algorithms. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(5):541-548.Google Scholar
7. Cone, DC, Benson, R, Schmidt, TA, Mann, NC. Field triage systems: methodologies from the literature. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004;8(2):130-137.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Zoraster, RM, Chidester, C, Koenig, W. Field triage and patient maldistribution in a mass-casualty incident. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(3):224-229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Jenkins, JL, McCarthy, ML, Sauer, LM, et al. Mass-casualty triage: time for an evidence-based approach. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(1):3-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Kahn, CA, Schultz, CH, Miller, KT, Anderson, CL. Does START triage work? An outcomes assessment after a disaster. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(3):424-430.Google Scholar
11. Sasser, SM, Hunt, RC, Faul, M, et al ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012;61(RR-1):1-20.Google Scholar
12. Cross, KP, Cicero, MX. Head-to-head comparison of disaster triage methods in pediatric, adult, and geriatric patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(6):668-676.Google Scholar
13. Cushman, JG, Pachter, HL, Beaton, HL. Two New York City hospitals’ surgical response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack in New York City. J Trauma. 2003;54(1):147-154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Injuries and illnesses among New York City Fire Department rescue workers after responding to the World Trade Center attacks. MMWR. 2002;51:1-5.Google Scholar
15. Kaufman, B, Ben-Eli, D, Asaeda, G, et al. Comparison of disaster triage methods. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62(6):644-645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Sacco, WJ, Navin, DM, Fiedler, KE, Waddell, RK 2nd, Long, WB, Buckman, RF Jr. Precise formulation and evidence-based application of resource-constrained triage. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(8):759-770.Google Scholar
17. Maningas, PA, Hime, DA, Parker, DE, McMurry, TA. The Soterion Rapid Triage System: evaluation of inter-rater reliability and validity. J Emerg Med. 2006;30(4):461-469.Google Scholar
18. Armstrong, JH, Hammond, J, Hirshberg, A, Frykberg, ER. Is over-triage associated with increased mortality? The evidence says “yes.” Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(1):4-5.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Arshad supplementary material

Appendix

Download Arshad supplementary material(File)
File 19.2 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Arshad supplementary material

Arshad supplementary material 1

Download Arshad supplementary material(Image)
Image 19.9 MB