Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:22:14.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrated Decision-Making in Response to Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents: Development and Initial Evaluation of a Course for Healthcare Professionals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Erica Pryor ,
Emily Heck ,
Linda Norman ,
Betsy Weiner ,
Rick Mathews ,
James Black  and
Thomas Terndrup
Erica Pryor*
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Nursing, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Emily Heck
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Emergency Care and Disaster Preparedness, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Linda Norman
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, International Nursing Coalition for Mass Casualty Education, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Betsy Weiner
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, International Nursing Coalition for Mass Casualty Education, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Rick Mathews
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University, National Center for Biomedical Research and Training, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
James Black
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Emergency Care and Disaster Preparedness, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Thomas Terndrup
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Emergency Care and Disaster Preparedness, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
*
Erica Pryor, PhD, RN University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Nursing Building, Room 235, 1701 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35294-1210 USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Standardized, validated training programs for teaching administrative decision-making to healthcare professionals responding to weapons of mass destruction (weapons of mass destruction) incidents have not been available. Therefore, a multidisciplinary team designed, developed, and offered a four-day, functional exercise, competency-based course at a national training center.

Objective:

This report provides a description of the development and initial evaluation of the course in changing participants' perceptions of their capabilities to respond to weapons of mass destruction events.

Methods:

Course participants were healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, emergency medical services administrators, hospital administrators, and public health officials. Each course included three modified tabletop and/or real-time functional exercises. A total of 441 participants attended one of the eight course offerings between March and August 2003. An intervention group only, pre-post design was used to evaluate change in perceived capabilities related to administrative decision-making for weapons of mass destruction incidents. Paired evaluation data were available on 339 participants (81.9%). Self-ratings for each of 21 capability statements were compared before and after the course. A 19-item total scale score for each participant was calculated from the pre-course and post-course evaluations. Paired t-tests on pre- and postcourse total scores were conducted separately for each course.

Results:

There was consistent improvement in self-rated capabilities after course completion for all 21 capability statements. Paired t-tests of pre- and postcourse total scale scores indicated a significant increase in mean ratings for each course (all p <0.001).

Conclusion:

The tabletop/real-time-exercise format was effective in increasing healthcare administrators' self-rated capabilities related to weapons of mass destruction disaster management and response. Integrating the competencies into training interventions designed for a specific target audience and deploying them into an interactive learning environment allowed the competency-based training objectives to be accomplished.

Keywords

administrative decision-makingbioterrorismbioterrorism preparednesschemical terrorismemergency preparednessincident command systemmass casualty incidentmultidisciplinary emergency response exercisepublic health emergency responsetabletop exerciseweapons of mass destruction
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 24 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Catlett, C, Perl, T, Jenckes, MW, et al. : Training of clinicians for public health events relevant to bioterrorism preparedness. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 51. AHRQ Publication No. 02-E011. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. January 2002.Google Scholar
2.Turnock, BJ: Roadmap for public health workforce preparedness. J Public Health Manag Pract 2003;9(6):471–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Lichiveld, M, Hodge, JG, Gebbie, K, et al. : Preparedness on the frontline: What's law got to do with it? J Law Med Ethics 2002;30(3):184–188.Google Scholar
4.Hsu, EB, Jenckes, MW, Catlett, CL, et al. : Training of Hospital Staff to Respond to a Mass Casualty Incident. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 95. (Prepared by the Johns Hopkins University Evidencebased Practice Center). AHRQ Publication No. 04-E015-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2004.Google Scholar
5.United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Emergency Preparedness and American College of Emergency Physicians-NBC Task Force: Final Report: Developing Objectives, Content, and Competencies for the Training of Emergency Medical Technicians, Emergency Physicians, and Emergency Nurses to Care for Casualties Resulting from Nuclear, Biological, or Chemical (NBC) Incidents. April 2001.Google Scholar
6.Association of American Medical Colleges: Training Future Physicians on Weapons of Mass Destruction: Report of the Expert Panel on Bioterrorism Education for Medical Students. 2003.Google Scholar
7.Roberts, HV, Sergesketter, BF: Quality is Personal: A Foundation for Total Quality Management. New York: Free Press. 1993.Google Scholar
8.Hinkle, D, Wiersma, W, Jurs, S: Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 5th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. 2003.Google Scholar
9.Nunnally, J: Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1978.Google Scholar
10.Inglesby, TV, Grossman, R, O'Toole, T: A plague on your city: Observations from TOPOFF. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:436–445.Google Scholar
11.Henning, KJ, Brennan, PJ, Hoegg, C, et al. : Health system preparedness for bioterrorism: Bringing the tabletop to the hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:146–155.Google Scholar
12.Beaton, RD, Johnson, LC: Instrument development and evaluation of domestic preparedness training for first responders. Prehosp Disast Med 2002;17(3):119–125.Google Scholar
13.US Congress: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997. Pub. L No. 104–201, Title XIV, Defense Against Weapons of Mass Destruction, Subtitle A, Domestic Preparedness §1412–§1415 (September 1996).Google Scholar
14.Jarrett, D: Lessons learned: The “Pale Horse” bioterrorism response exercise. Disaster Manag Response 2003;1:114–118.Google Scholar