Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:33:46.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hospital Ships Adrift? Part 1: A Systematic Literature Review Characterizing US Navy Hospital Ship Humanitarian and Disaster Response, 2004-2012

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2013

Derek Licina
Derek Licina*
Affiliation:
Department of Global Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC USA
*
Correspondence: Derek Licina, MPH, DrPH(c) The George Washington University Department of Global Health 2175 K Street, NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20037 USA E-mail [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

United States foreign policy is tied extensively to health initiatives, many related to the use of military assets. Despite substantial resource investment by the US Department of Defense (DoD) in hospital ship humanitarian assistance and disaster response missions, the impact of this investment is unclear.

Methods

A systematic literature review of both peer-reviewed and grey literature using eight databases representing the international community and multiple sectors was conducted. Data on the characteristics of missions directly related to US Navy hospital ship humanitarian assistance and disaster response from 2004-2012 were extracted and documented.

Results

Of the 1445 sources reviewed, a total of 43 publications met criteria for review. Six (13.9%) met empirical documentation criteria and 37 (86.0%) were considered nonempirical expert opinions and anecdotal accounts that were primarily descriptive in nature. Overall, disaster response accounted for 67.4% (29/43) and humanitarian assistance 25.6% (11/43). Public and private sector participants produced 79.0% (34/43) and 20.9% (9/43) of the publications respectively. Of private sector publications, 88.9% (8/9) focused on disaster response compared to 61.8% (21/34) from the public sector. Of all publications meeting inclusion criteria, 81.4% (35/43) focused on medical care, 9.3% (4/43) discussed partnerships, 4.7% (2/43) training, and 4.7% (2/43) medical ethics and strategic utilization. No primary author publications from the diplomatic, development, or participating host nations were identified. One (2.3%) of the 43 publications was from a partner nation participant.

Discussion

Without rigorous research methods yielding valid and reliable data-based information pertaining to Navy hospital ship mission impact, policy makers are left with anecdotal reports to influence their decision-making processes. This is inadequate considering the frequency of hospital ship deployments used as a foreign policy tool and the considerable funding that is involved in each mission. Future research efforts should study empirically the short- and long-term impacts of hospital ship missions in building regional and civil-military partnerships while meeting the humanitarian and disaster response needs of host nation populations.

LicinaD. Hospital Ships Adrift? Part 1: A Systematic Literature Review Characterizing US Navy Hospital Ship Humanitarian and Disaster Response, 2004-2012. Prehosp Disaster Med.2013;28(3):1–10..

Keywords

disaster responsehospital shipshumanitarian assistancesystematic literature review
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , June 2013 , pp. 230 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kickbusch, I, Silberschmidt, G, Buss, P. Global health diplomacy: the need for new perspectives, strategic approaches and skills in global health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2007;85(3):230-232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Department of the Navy. OPNAV Instruction 5440.75B, administration, operation, and logistic support of T-AH 19 mercy class hospital ships. Department of the Navy Issuances. 2010:1-17.Google Scholar
3.Provencher, MT, Douglas, TD. Humanitarian assistance and disaster relief aboard the USNS Mercy (TAH-19). J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011;20(1):38-43.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Terror Free Tomorrow. Unprecedented terror free tomorrow polls: world's largest Muslim countries welcome US Navy. 2006:1-62.Google Scholar
5.Taylor, G. China's Caribbean mission shows growing naval capability. World Politics Review. 2011.Google Scholar
6. Xinhua. Chinese Navy hospital ship sets sail on first overseas medical mission 2010. http://www.gov.cn/english/2010-08/31/content_1692806.htm. Accessed November 11, 2011.Google Scholar
7. MercoPress. China on ‘harmonious mission’ in the Caribbean to show it's a responsible power 2011. http://en.mercopress.com/2011/11/02/china-on-harmonious-mission-in-the-caribbean-to-show-it-s-a-responsible-power. Accessed March 22, 2012.Google Scholar
8.Marghella, P. Replace the great white elephants…with LSTs. United States Naval Institute Proceedings. 1998:71-73.Google Scholar
9.Licina, DJ, Schor, K. Developing a monitoring and evaluating capability for the U.S. Department of Defense humanitarian assistance program. Mil Med. 2007;172(4):339-345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Reaves, EJ, Schor, KW, Burkle, FM Jr. Implementation of evidence-based humanitarian programs in military-led missions: Part I. Qualitative gap analysis of current military and international aid programs. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(4):230-236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Reaves, EJ, Schor, KW, Burkle, FM Jr. Implementation of evidence-based humanitarian programs in military-led missions: Part II. The impact assessment model. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(4):237-244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Bonventre, EV. Monitoring and evaluation of Department of Defense humanitarian assistance programs. Military Review. 2008;88(1):66-72.Google Scholar
13.Bourdeaux, ME, Lawry, L, Bonventre, EV, Burkle, FM Jr. Involvement of the US Department of Defense in civilian assistance, Part I: a quantitative description of the projects funded by the overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid program. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010;4(1):66-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Welling, DR, Ryan, JM, Burris, DG, Rich, NM. Seven sins of humanitarian medicine. World J Surg. 2010;34(3):466-470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Institute of Medicine. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews 2011. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Finding-What-Works-in-Health-Care-Standards-for-Systematic-Reviews.aspx. Accessed March 27, 2011.Google Scholar
16.Cochrane Collaboration. Working together to provide the best evidence for health care 2012. http://www.cochrane.org/about-us. Accessed March 27, 2012.Google Scholar
17.Campbell Collaboration. What helps? What harms? Based on what evidence? 2012. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/about_us/index.php. Accessed March 27, 2012.Google Scholar
18. Hammerstrom K, Wade A, Jorgensen AC. Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. 2010:1-74.Google Scholar
19.Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Almonte, A. Humanitarian nursing challenges: a grounded theory study. Mil Med. 2009;174(5):479-485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Amundson, D, Dadekian, G, Etienne, M, et al. Practicing internal medicine onboard the USNS COMFORT in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):733-737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Anderson, KM. Charting a course into the unknown: Banda Aceh, Indonesia, tsunami, 2004. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2007;43(1):47-51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Atkinson, P. Mercy mission. Sea Power. 2006;49(10):40-46.Google Scholar
24.Bailey, P Jr. USNS Comfort: Caring for the sick at sea. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(1):353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Benedek, DM, Ritchie, EC. “Just-in-time” mental health training and surveillance for the Project HOPE mission. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl 1):63-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Davis, KD, Douglas, T, Kuncir, E. Pacific Partnership 2008: U.S. Navy fellows provide humanitarian assistance in Southeast Asia. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2009;94(2):14-23.Google ScholarPubMed
27.Eisman, D. “Armada of hope”. Sea Power. 2010;53(5):16-22.Google Scholar
28.Etienne, M, Powell, C, Amundson, D. Healthcare ethics: the experience after the Haitian earthquake. Am J Disaster Med. 2010;5(3):141-147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Etienne, M, Powell, C, Faux, B. Disaster relief in Haiti: a perspective from the neurologists on the USNS COMFORT. Lancet Neurology. 2010;9(5):461-463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Ferrara, S. Radiology afloat: The impact of diagnostic and interventional radiology during the 2005 tsunami relief effort aboard the USNS Mercy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(3):289-302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Firth, PG, Solomon, JB, Roberts, LL, Gleeson, TD. Airway management of tetanus after the Haitian earthquake: new aspects of old observations. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(3):545-547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Fitzsimons, MG, Sparks, JW, Jones, SF, Crowley, JM, Dalal, A, Sunder, N. Anesthesia services during Operation Unified Assistance, aboard the USNS Mercy, after the tsunami in Southeast Asia. Mil Med. 2007;172(3):227-231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Galeckas, K. Dermatology aboard the USNS Comfort: disaster relief operations in Haiti after the 2010 earthquake. Dermatol Clin. 2011;29(1):15-19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Hartgerink, BJ, Chapman, LE, Stevenson, J, Donahue, TF, Pagliara, C. Utilization of surgical resources during the USNS Comfort humanitarian mission to the Americas, June to October 2007. Mil Med. 2010;175(9):638-646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Hussey, SM, Dukette, PJ, Dunn, SH, et al. The 2010 Haiti earthquake: a pathology perspective aboard the USNS Comfort. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135(4):417-421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.King, HC, Baker, W. Pacific Partnership 2008: The surgical mission, surgical screening process, and the anesthetic management of uncontrolled, untreated hypertensive patients. Mil Med. 2010;175(1):33-40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Kouhestani, J. Good will cruisin’. Officer. 2009;85(5):40-41.Google Scholar
38.Llewellyn, M. Perspectives from MTF USNS Mercy. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl 1):30-33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.McCoy, ST. Hope on the horizon. All Hands. 2006;(1075):22-29.Google Scholar
40.McDaniel, WJ. Lessons learned from Indonesia: an outline. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl 1):59-62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.McGuinness, KM. The USNS Mercy and the changing landscape of humanitarian and disaster response. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl 1):48-52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Morrow, RC, Llewellyn, DM. Tsunami overview. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl 1):5-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Negus, TL, Brown, CJ, Konoske, P. Determining medical staffing requirements for humanitarian assistance missions. Mil Med. 2010;175(1):1-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Peake, JB. The project HOPE and USNS Mercy tsunami “experiment”. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl 1):27-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45.Perez, JT, Coady, J, De Jesus, EL, McGuinness, KM, Bondan, S. Operation Unified Assistance population-based programs of the U.S. Public Health Service and international team. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl 1):53-58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46.Provencher, MT, Douglas, TD. Humanitarian assistance and disaster relief aboard the USNS Mercy (TAH-19). J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011;20(1):38-43.Google ScholarPubMed
47.Pryor, T. Health diplomacy through collaboration and a story of hope in tsunami-ravaged Banda Aceh, Indonesia: a U.S. Public Health Service nurse officer perspective. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl 1):44-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48.Ray, JM, Lindsay, RW, Kumar, AR. Treatment of earthquake-related craniofacial injuries aboard the USNS Comfort during Operation Unified Response. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(6):2102-2108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.Reissman, DB, Schreiber, M, Klomp, RW, Hoover, M, Kowalski-Trakofler, K, Perez, J. The virtual network supporting the front lines: addressing emerging behavioral health problems following the tsunami of 2004. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl 1):40-43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50.Satter, EK. The role of a dermatologist on military humanitarian missions. Cutis. 2010;85(2):85-89.Google ScholarPubMed
51.Sechriest, VF 2nd, Lhowe, DW. Prolonged femoral external fixation after natural disaster: Successful late conversion to intramedullary nail aboard the USNS Mercy hospital ship. Am J Disaster Med. 2008;3(5):307-312.Google ScholarPubMed
52.Skyrme, L. Pacific Partnership 2010: Humanitarian civic assistance on a U.S. Navy hospital ship. J R Nav Med Serv. 2010;96(3):169-174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53.Tadlock, MD. Pacific partnership: A U.S. Navy resident's experience on the USNS Mercy in Southeast Asia. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2010;95(2):17-20.Google Scholar
54.Thomas, S. Making a difference: CRNAs aboard the USNS Comfort respond to the disaster in Haiti. AANA J. 2010;78(4):264-268.Google Scholar
55.Timboe, HL, Holt, GR. Project HOPE volunteers and the Navy hospital ship Mercy. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl 1):34-36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56.Troup, L. The USNS Mercy's Southeast Asia humanitarian cruise: the perioperative experience. AORN J. 2007;86(5):781-790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57.Waichi, WB, Keenan, L, Edward, M. Massachusetts General hospital participation in operation unified assistance for tsunami relief in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl 1):37-39.Google Scholar
58.Walk, RM, Donahue, TF, Sharpe, RP, Safford, SD. Three phases of disaster relief in Haiti-pediatric surgical care on board the United States naval ship Comfort. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(10):1978-1984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59.Webb, NJ, Richter, A. Strategy at the crossroads: medical humanitarian assistance missions for navy hospital ships. Defense Secur Anal. 2010;26(2):161-179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60.Wegner, RA, Boal, A, Walters, L, et al. Bringing comfort to Haiti. Plast Surg Nurs. 2010;30(3):133-149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61.Whittman, AL. Delivering hope. Sea Power. 2010;53(5):4.Google Scholar
62.Wong, W, Brandt, L, Keenan, ME. Massachusetts general hospital participation in operation unified assistance for tsunami relief in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl 1):37-39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63.Yates, M. Medical-surgical nurses volunteer to aid tsunami victims. Medsurg Nurs. 2005;14(5):331-334.Google ScholarPubMed
64.Skyrme, L. Pacific Partnership 2010: Humanitarian civic assistance on a U.S. Navy hospital ship. J R Nav Med Serv. 2010;96(3):169-174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65.Almonte, ALC. Humanitarian nursing challenges: a grounded theory study. Mil Med. 2009;174(5):479-485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66. Department of Defense. The national military strategy of the United States of America. 2011:1-21.Google Scholar
67. The White House. The National Security Strategy of the United States. 2010:1-52.Google Scholar
68. U.S. Pacific Fleet. Pacific Partnership mission 2011. http://www.cpf.navy.mil/PP11/ppmission.shtml. Accessed September 29, 2011.Google Scholar
69.Sechriest, VF 2nd, Lhowe, DW. Prolonged femoral external fixation after natural disaster: Successful late conversion to intramedullary nail aboard the USNS Mercy hospital ship. Am J Disaster Med. 2008;3(5):307-312.Google ScholarPubMed
70.Conlin, J. Comfort story no. 2. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(2):487-488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
71.Braner, D. “We are here to help”: Comfort story no. 1. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(2):487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72. European Centre for Health Policy, WHO Regional Office for Europe. Health impact assessment: main concepts and suggested approach. Gothenburg consensus paper 1999. www.apho.org.uk/resource/view.aspx?RID=44163. Accessed March 27, 2012.Google Scholar
73.Kickbusch, I, Erk, C. Global Health Diplomacy: the new recognition of health in foreign policy. In: Clapham A, Robinson M, Hangartner S, eds, Realizing the right to health. Switzerland: Ruffer & Rub; 2009:517-524.Google Scholar
74.Krieger, GR, Utzinger, J, Winkler, MS, et al. Barbarians at the gate: storming the Gothenburg consensus. Lancet. 2010;375:2129-2131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75.Feldbaum, H, Michaud, J. 2010. Health diplomacy and the enduring relevance of foreign policy interests. PLoS Medicine. 2010;7(4):e1000226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed