Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:13:04.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evacuating Damaged and Destroyed Buildings on 9/11: Behavioral and Structural Barriers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2013

Justina L. Groeger ,
Steven D. Stellman ,
Alexandra Kravitt  and
Robert M. Brackbill
Justina L. Groeger
Affiliation:
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, World Trade Center Health Registry, Long Island City, New York USA
Steven D. Stellman
Affiliation:
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, World Trade Center Health Registry, Long Island City, New York USA Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York USA
Alexandra Kravitt
Affiliation:
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, World Trade Center Health Registry, Long Island City, New York USA
Robert M. Brackbill*
Affiliation:
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, World Trade Center Health Registry, Long Island City, New York USA
*
Correspondence: Robert M. Brackbill, PhD, MPH World Trade Center Health Registry New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene 42-09 28th Street Long Island City, New York 11101 USA E-mail [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Evacuation of the World Trade Center (WTC) twin towers and surrounding buildings damaged in the September 11, 2001 attacks provides a unique opportunity to study factors that affect emergency evacuation of high rise buildings.

Problem

The goal of this study is to understand the extent to which structural and behavioral barriers and limitations of personal mobility affected evacuation by occupants of affected buildings on September 11, 2001.

Methods

This analysis included 5,023 civilian, adult enrollees within the World Trade Center Health Registry who evacuated the two World Trade Center towers and over 30 other Lower Manhattan buildings that were damaged or destroyed on September 11, 2001. Multinomial logistic regression was used to predict total evacuation time (<30 to ≤60 minutes, >1 hour to <2 hours relative to ≤30 minutes) in relation to number of infrastructure barriers and number of behavioral barriers, adjusted for demographic and other factors.

Results

A higher percentage of evacuees reported encountering at least one behavioral barrier (84.9%) than reported at least one infrastructure barrier (51.9%). This pattern was consistent in all buildings except WTC 1, the first building attacked, where >90% of evacuees reported encountering both types of barriers. Smoke and poor lighting were the most frequently-reported structural barriers. Extreme crowding, lack of communication with officials, and being surrounded by panicked crowds were the most frequently-reported behavioral barriers. Multivariate analyses showed evacuation time to be independently associated with the number of each type of barrier as well as gender (longer times for women), but not with the floor from which evacuation began. After adjustment, personal mobility impairment was not associated with increased evacuation time.

Conclusion

Because most high-rise buildings have unique designs, infrastructure factors tend to be less predictable than behavioral factors, but both need to be considered in developing emergency evacuation plans in order to decrease evacuation time and, consequently, risk of injury and death during an emergency evacuation.

GroegerJL, StellmanSD, KravittA, BrackbillRM. Evacuating Damaged and Destroyed Buildings on 9/11: Behavioral and Structural Barriers. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(6):1-11.

Keywords

disaster evacuationdisaster preparednessWorld Trade Center
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 28 , Issue 6 , December 2013 , pp. 556 - 566
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Galea, ER, Hulse, L, Day, R, Siddiqui, A, Sharp, G. The UK WTC 9/11 evacuation study: an overview of findings derived from first-hand interview data and computer modeling. Fire and Materials. 2012;36(5-6):501-521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Li, W, Kennedy, J, Kelley, D, Sun, Y, Maduro, G, Hartman-O'Connell, I. Summary of Vital Statistics 2009 - The City of New York. New York: Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2010.Google Scholar
3.Shyam-Sunder, S. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster: Final Report of the National Construction Safety Team on the Collapses of the World Trade Center Towers (NIST NCSTAR 1). National Institute of Standards and Technology Published May 12, 2010. http://archive.org/details/NIST_WTC_Investigation_Reports-909017. Accessed October 2, 2013.Google Scholar
4.Averill, JD, Milet, DS, Peacock, RD, et al. Occupant Behavior, Egress, and Emergency Communications. In: National Institute of Standards and Technology, ed Washington, D.C. 2005:298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Gershon, RRM, Magda, LA, Riley, HEM, Sherman, MF. The World Trade Center evacuation study: factors associated with initiation and length of time for evacuation. Fire and Materials. 2011;36(5-6):481-500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States: The 9/11 Commission Report. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2004.Google Scholar
7.Farfel, M, Digrande, L, Brackbill, R, et al. An Overview of 9/11 Experiences and Respiratory and Mental Health Conditions among World Trade Center Health Registry Enrollees. J Urban Health. 2008;85(6):880-909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Brackbill, RM, Hadler, JL, DiGrande, L, et al. Asthma and posttraumatic stress symptoms 5 to 6 years following exposure to the World Trade Center terrorist attack. JAMA. 2009;302(5):502-516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.DiGrande, L, Neria, Y, Brackbill, RM, Pulliam, P, Galea, S. Long-term posttraumatic stress symptoms among 3,271 civilian survivors of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(3):271-281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Brackbill, RM, Thorpe, LE, DiGrande, L, et al. Surveillance for World Trade Center disaster health effects among survivors of collapsed and damaged buildings. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006;55(2):1-18.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Bonneau, A, O'Rourke, TD, Palmer, PE. Water supply performance and fire suppression during the World Trade Center disaster. J Infrastruct Syst. 2010;16:264-272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Shields, TJ, Boyce, KE, McConnell, N. The behaviour and evacuation experiences of WTC 9/11 evacuees with self-designated mobility impairments. Fire Safety J. 2009;44(6):881-893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Gershon, RR, Qureshi, KA, Rubin, MS, Raveis, VH. Factors associated with high-rise evacuation: qualitative results from the World Trade Center Evacuation Study. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(3):165-173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Gershon, RR, Rubin, MS, Qureshi, KA, Canton, AN, Matzner, FJ. Participatory action research methodology in disaster research: results from the World Trade Center evacuation study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(3):142-149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed