Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:55:13.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimating Blood Transfusion Requirements in Preparation for a Major Earthquake: The Tehran, Iran Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Morteza Tabatabaie
Affiliation:
Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization, Tehran, Iran
Ali Ardalan*
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran National Institute of Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Hassan Abolghasemi
Affiliation:
Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization, Tehran, Iran
Kourosh Holakouie Naieni
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Farshad Pourmalek
Affiliation:
Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Batool Ahmadi
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mostafa Shokouhi
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
Italia Avenue, No. 78, Tehran, Iran E-mail: [email protected] OR [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

Tehran, Iran, with a population of approximately seven million people, is at a very high risk for a devastating earthquake. This study aims to estimate the number of units of blood required at the time of such an earthquake.

Methods:

To assume the damage of an earthquake in Tehran, the researchers applied the Centre for Earthquake and Environmental Studies of Tehran/Japan International Cooperation Agency (CEST/JICA) fault-activation scenarios, and accordingly estimated the injury-to-death ratio (IDR), hospital admission rate (HAR), and blood transfusion rate (BTR). The data were based on Iran's major earthquakes during last two decades. The following values were considered for the analysis: (1) IDR = 1, 2, and 3; (2) HAR = 0.25 and 0.35; and (3) BTR = 0.05, 0.07, and 0.10. The American Association of Blood Banks' formula was adapted to calculate total required numbers of Type-O red blood cell (RBC) units. Calculations relied on the following assumptions: (1) no change in Tehran's vulnerability from CEST/JICA study time; (2) no functional damage to Tehran Blood Transfusion Post; and (3) standards of blood safety are secure during the disaster responses. Surge capacity was estimated based on the Bam earthquake experience. The maximum, optimum, and minimum blood deficits were calculated accordingly.

Results:

No deficit was estimated in case of the Mosha fault activation and the optimum scenario of North Tehran fault. The maximum blood deficit was estimated from the activation of the Ray fault, requiring up to 107,293 and 95,127 units for the 0–24 hour and the 24–72 hour periods after the earthquake, respectively. The optimum deficit was estimated up to 46,824 and 16,528 units for 0–24 hour and 24–72 hour period after the earthquake, respectively.

Conclusions:

In most Tehran earthquake scenarios, a shortage of blood was estimated to surge the capacity of all blood transfusion posts around the country within first three days, as it might ask for a 2–8 times more than what the system had produced following the Bam earthquake.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Ambraseys, NN, Melville, CP: A History of Persian Earthquakes. London: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
2.Tehran Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization: Organization history. Available at http://entdmmo.tehran.ir/Default.aspx?tabid=1966&language=en-US. Accessed 20 May 2010.Google Scholar
3.Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Centre for Earthquake and Environmental Studies of Tehran (CEST), Tehran Municipality: The Study on Seismic Microzoning of the Greater Tehran Area in the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2000.Google Scholar
4.Peek-Asa, C, Ramirez, M, Seligson, H, Shoaf, K: Seismic, structural, and individual factors associated with earthquake related injury. Inj Prev 2003;9(1):6266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Abolghasemi, H, Radfar, MH, Tabatabaee, M, Hosseini-Divkolayee, NS, Burkle, FM: Revisiting blood transfusion preparedness: Experience from the Bam earthquake response. Prehosp Disaster Med 2008;23(5):391394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Busch, MP, Guiltinan, A, Skettino, S, Cordell, R, ZG, KS. Safety of blood donations following a natural disaster. Transfusion 1991;31(8):719723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.de Ville de Goyet, C: Blood: The Ultimate Donation in Emergencies. Prehosp Disaster Med 2008;23(5):395396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Schmidt, PJ: Blood and disaster—Supply and demand. N Engl J Med 2002;346(8):617620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Hess, JR, Thomas, MJG: Blood use in war and disaster: Lessons from the past century. Transfusion 2003;43:16221633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed