Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:59:59.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differences in Medical Care Usage between Two Mass-Gathering Sporting Events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2012

James O. Burton ,
Stephen J. Corry ,
Gareth Lewis  and
William S. Priestman
James O. Burton*
Affiliation:
John Walls Renal Unit, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
Stephen J. Corry
Affiliation:
Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
Gareth Lewis
Affiliation:
Paediatric Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
William S. Priestman
Affiliation:
Heath Lane General Practice, Earl Shilton, Leicester, UK
*
Correspondence: James O. Burton, DM, MBChB John Walls Renal Unit Leicester General Hospital Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK E-mail [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Event planning for mass gatherings involves the utilization of methods that prospectively can predict medical resource use. However, there is growing recognition that historical data for a specific event can help to accurately forecast medical requirements. This study was designed to investigate the differences in medical usage rates between two popular mass-gathering sports events in the UK: rugby matches and horse races.

Methods

A retrospective study of all attendee consultations with the on-site medical teams at the Leicester Tigers Rugby Football Club and the Leicester Racecourse from September 2008 through August 2009 was undertaken. Patient demographics, medical usage rates, level of care, as well as professional input and the effects of alcohol use were recorded.

Results

Medical usage rates were higher at the Leicester Racecourse (P < .01), although the demographics of the patients were similar and included 24% children and 16% staff. There was no difference in level of care required between the two venues with the majority of cases being minor, although a higher proportion of casualties at the Leicester Tigers event were seen by a health care professional compared with the Leicester Racecourse (P < .001). Alcohol was a contributing factor in only 5% of consultations.

Conclusions

These two major sporting venues had similar attendance requirements for medical treatment that are comparable to other mass-gathering sports events. High levels of staff and pediatric presentations may have an impact on human resource planning for events on a larger scale, and the separation of treatment areas may help to minimize the number of unnecessary or opportunistic reviews by the on-site health care professionals.

BurtonJO , CorrySJ , LewisG , PriestmanWS . Differences in Medical Care Usage between Two Mass-Gathering Sporting Events. Prehosp Disaster Med.2012;27(4):1-5.

Keywords

crowdhorse racingmass gatheringsrugby
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 458 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rt. Hon Lord Wheatley. Report of the enquiry into crowd safety at sports grounds. London, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1972.Google Scholar
2. Lord Justice Taylor; Her Majesty's Stationery Office. The Hillsborough stadium disaster: 15 April 1989, final report. http://www.fsf.org.uk/uploaded/publications/pdfs/hillsborough%20stadium%20disaster%20final%20report.pdf. Published January 1990. Accessed May 20, 2012.Google Scholar
3. Gibson, RM. Report of the medical working party, London, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1990.Google Scholar
4. Kerr, GW, Wilkie, SC, McGuffie, CA. Medical cover at Scottish football matches: have the recommendations of the Gibson report been met? Br J Sports Med. 1999;33(4):274-275.Google Scholar
5. Crawford, M, Donnelly, J, Gordon, J, et al. An analysis of consultations with the crowd doctors at Glasgow Celtic Football Club, season 1999-2000. Br J Sports Med. 2001;35(4):245-249.Google Scholar
6. Hadden, W, Kelly, S, Pumford, N. Medical cover for “The Open” golf championship. Br J Sports Med. 1992;26(3):125-127.Google Scholar
7. British Horseracing Authority General Instructions (BHAGIs). Requirements for the provision of racecourse medical services. (Section 11.11-11.14). http://www.britishhorseracing.com/resources/BHAGIs/. Updated March 2012. Accessed May 20, 2012.Google Scholar
8. Rugby Football Union Professional Game Board. Minimum standards criteria: medical personnel for spectators. Season 2011/2012:Sections M35-M39: 45-49.Google Scholar
9. Arbon, P. Mass-gathering medicine: a review of the evidence and future directions for research. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(2):131-135.Google Scholar
10. Health and Safety Executive. The Event Safety Guide, 2nd ed. http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/hsg195.pdf. Published 1999. Accessed May 20, 2012.Google Scholar
11. Hartman, N, Williamson, A, Sojka, B, et al. Predicting resource use at mass gatherings using a simplified stratification scoring model. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27(3):337-343.Google Scholar
12. Zeitz, KM, Zeitz, CJ, Arbon, P. Forecasting medical work at mass-gathering events: predictive model versus retrospective review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005;20(3):164-168.Google Scholar
13. English premier league attendance–2009/2010. ESPN Soccernet Web site. http://soccernet.espn.go.com/stats/attendance/_/league/eng.1/year/2009/barclays-premier-league?cc=5901. Accessed May 20, 2012.Google Scholar
14. Green G. Attendances rise at racecourses in 2009. Racing Post. January 14, 2010:5. http://www.racingpost.com/news/horse-racing/#newsArchiveTabs=newsArchiveTab. Accessed May 20, 2012.Google Scholar
15. Aviva Premiership Fixtures & Results Table, 2009-2010. Aviva Premiership Rugby Web site. http://www.premiershiprugby.com/premiership/rugby/index.php?includeref=14515&season=2009-2010. Accessed May 20, 2012.Google Scholar
16. Fox, K. Factors influencing good crowd behaviour: a case study of British horseracing. Australian Society for Sports History Bulletin. 2000;32:20-25.Google Scholar
17. Slabbert, AD, Ukpere, WI. A preliminary comparative study of rugby and football spectators’ attitudes towards violence. African Journal of Business Management. 2010;4(4):459-466.Google Scholar
18. Milsten, AM, Maguire, BJ, Bissell, RA, Seaman, KG. Mass-gathering medical care: a review of the literature. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002;17(3):151-162.Google Scholar
19. Milsten, AM, Seaman, KG, Liu, P, Bissell, RA, Maguire, BJ. Variables influencing medical usage rates, injury patterns, and levels of care for mass gatherings. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003;18(4):334-346.Google Scholar
20. Flabouris, A, Bridgewater, FH. Effect of crowd size on patient volume at a large, multipurpose, indoor stadium. J Emerg Med. 1989;7(4):379-384.Google Scholar
21. Enock, KE, Jacobs, J. The olympic and paralympic games 2012: literature review of the logistical planning and operational challenges for public health. Public Health. 2008;122(11):1229-1238.Google Scholar
22. The Health and Social Care Information Centre. Accident and emergency attendances in England (experimental statistics); 2008-09. Appendix 1;37-49. http://www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/publications/AandE/AandE0809/AE_Attendances_in_England%20_experimental_statistics_%202008_09_v2.pdf. Published January 2010. Accessed May 23, 2012.Google Scholar
23. Smith, JK, Roth, S. Paediatric A&E attendances; findings and consequences. Arc Dis Child. 2008;93(9):812-813.Google Scholar
24. Wolfe, J, Martinez, R, Scott, WA. Baseball and beer: an analysis of alcohol consumption patterns among male spectators at major-league sporting events. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;31(5):629-632.Google Scholar
25. Spaite, DW, Meislin, HW, Valenzuela, TD, Criss, EA, Smith, R, Nelson, A. Banning alcohol in a major college stadium: impact on the incidence and patterns of injury and illness. J Am Coll Health. 1990;39(3):125-128.Google Scholar