Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:17:43.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of High-Dose Epinephrine Versus Standard-Dose Epinephrine in Adult Cardiac Arrest in the Prehospital Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Richard D. Carvolth  and
Ardith J. Hamilton
Richard D. Carvolth*
Affiliation:
Department of Health and Human Services, Emergency Medical Services Office, County of Marin, San Rafael, California
Ardith J. Hamilton*
Affiliation:
Department of Health and Human Services, Emergency Medical Services Office, County of Marin, San Rafael, California
*
20 N. San Pedro Road, Suite 2002, San Rafael, CA 94903, USA
20 N. San Pedro Road, Suite 2002, San Rafael, CA 94903, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the efficacy of high-dose epinephrine (HDE) with standard-dose epinephrine (SDE) in the management of cardiac arrest in adults in the prehospital setting.

Hypothesis:

The use of HDE will improve the outcome of adult patients in cardiac arrest.

Methods:

In a general population of 700,000 persons, in a mixed geographical area of 2,200 square miles, a 12-month retrospective study of SDE and a 12-month prospective trial of HDE were conducted involving adult patients in cardiac arrest in the prehospital setting. Treatment was provided by paramedic-level clinicians. In the control group, patients were treated according to existing American Heart Association cardiac resuscitation guidelines using SDE (defined as 1.0 mg boluses to a maximum dose of 4 mg). In the test group, the same guidelines were revised to use HDE (defined as a rapid sequence of 5, 10, and 15 mg boluses to a total dose of 30 mg).

Results:

The control group included 594 patients; the test group consisted of 580 patients. The overall survival rate to hospital admission in the control group was 14.5% (84 patients) and in the test group 15.3% (89 patients). The survival rate to hospital discharge in the control group was 4.9% (29 patients) versus 4.8% (28 patients) in the test group. For patients whose initial rhythms were ventricular fibrillation, survival to admission in the control group was 20.4% (39 patients) versus 24.4% (43 patients) in the test group. Survival to discharge for patients with ventricular fibrillation in the control group was 8.9% (17 patients) versus 10.8% (19 patients) in the test group.

Conclusion:

There was no statistically significant difference in overall rate of survival to hospital admission or discharge between patients treated with SDE and those treated with HDE, regardless of the initial rhythm.

Keywords

advanced cardiac life supportcardiac arrestepinephrineoutcomeprehospitalsurvival
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 219 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Crile, G, Dolley, DT: Experimental research into resuscitation of dogs killed by anesthetics and asphyxia. J Exp Med 1906;8:713–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Standards for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care. JAMA 1974;277 (Supplement):833–868.Google Scholar
3. Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care. JAMA 1992;268:2171–2302.Google Scholar
4. Redding, JS, Pearson, JW: Evaluation of drugs for cardiac resuscitation. Anesthesiology 1963;24:203–207.Google Scholar
5. Otto, CW, Yakaitis, RW, Redding, JS et al. : Comparison of dopamine, dobutamine, and epinephrine in CPR. Crit Care Med 1981;9:366.Google Scholar
6. Koehler, RC, Michael, JR: Beneficial effects of epinephrine infusion on cerebral and myocardial blood flows during CPR. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:744–749.Google Scholar
7. Kosnik, JW, Jackson, RE, Keats, S, et al. : Dose-related response of centrally administered epinephrine on the change in aortic diastolic pressure during closed-chest massage in dogs. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:204–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Brown, CG, Werman, HA, Davis, EA: The effects of graded doses of epinephrine on regional myocardial blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in swine. Circulation 1987;75:491–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Brown, CG, Taylor, RB, Werman, HA: Effect of standard doses of epinephrine on myocardial oxygen delivery and utilization during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 1988;16:536–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Gonzalez, ER, Ornato, JP, Levine, RL: Vasopressor effect of epinephrine with and without dopamine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Drug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy 1988;22:868–871.Google Scholar
11. Gonzalez, ER, Ornato, JP, Garnett, AR: Dose-dependent vasopressor response to epinephrine during CPR in human beings. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:920–926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Marwick, TH, Case, C, Siskind, V: Adverse effect of early high-dose epinephrine on outcome of ventricular fibrillation. Lancet 1988; 2:66–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Goetting, MG, Paradis, NA: High-dose epinephrine in refractory pediatric cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 1989;17:1258–1262.Google Scholar
14. Goetting, MG, Paradis, NA: High dose epinephrine improves outcome from pediatric cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:22–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Martin, D, Werman, HA, Brown, CG: Four case studies: High-dose epinephrine in cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:322–326.Google Scholar
16. Callaham, M, Barton, CW, Kayser, S: Potential complications of high-dose epinephrine therapy in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. JAMA 1991;265:1117–1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Ornato, JP: High-dose epinephrine during resuscitation: A word of caution. JAMA 1991;265:1160–1161.Google Scholar
18. Paradis, NA, Martin, GB, Rosenberg, J: The effect of standard- and high-dose epinephrine on coronary perfusion pressure during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA 1991;265:1139–1144.Google Scholar
19. Barton, C, Callaham, M: High-dose epinephrine improves the return of spontaneous circulation rates in human victims of cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:722–725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Lindner, KH, Ahnefeld, FW, Prengel, AW: Comparison of standard- and high-dose adrenaline in the resuscitation of asystole and electro-mechanical dissociation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991;35:253–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Stiell, IG, Hebert, PC, Weitzman, BN, et al. : High-dose epinephrine in adult cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 1992:327:1045–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Brown, CG, Martin, DR, Pepe, PE, et al. : A comparison of standard-dose and high-dose epinephrine in cardiac arrest outside the hospital. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1051–1055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed