Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:54:29.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Avoid the Goose! Paramedic Identification of Esophageal Intubation by Ultrasound

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2018

Penelope C. Lema*
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Buffalo, New YorkUSA
Michael O’Brien
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Buffalo, New YorkUSA
Juliana Wilson
Affiliation:
University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine, Aurora, ColoradoUSA
Erika St. James
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Buffalo, New YorkUSA
Heather Lindstrom
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Buffalo, New YorkUSA
John DeAngelis
Affiliation:
Cambridge Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine, Cambridge, MassachusettsUSA
Jennifer Caldwell
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Buffalo, New YorkUSA
Paul May
Affiliation:
Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Applied Technology Laboratory for Advanced Surgery (ATLAS) Team, Buffalo, New York USA
Brian Clemency
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Buffalo, New YorkUSA
*
Correspondence: Penelope C. Lema, MD Buffalo General HospitalDepartment of Emergency Medicine 100 High Street, D-6 Buffalo, New York 14203 USA E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objectives

Rapid identification of esophageal intubations is critical to avoid patient morbidity and mortality. Continuous waveform capnography remains the gold standard for endotracheal tube (ETT) confirmation, but it has limitations. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may be a useful alternative for confirming ETT placement. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of paramedic-performed POCUS identification of esophageal intubations with and without ETT manipulation.

Methods

A prospective, observational study using a cadaver model was conducted. Local paramedics were recruited as subjects and each completed a survey of their demographics, employment history, intubation experience, and prior POCUS training. Subjects participated in a didactic session in which they learned POCUS identification of ETT location. During each study session, investigators randomly placed an ETT in either the trachea or esophagus of four cadavers, confirmed with direct laryngoscopy. Subjects then attempted to determine position using POCUS both without and with manipulation of the ETT. Manipulation of the tube was performed by twisting the tube. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to assess the results and the effects of previous paramedic experience.

Results

During 12 study sessions, from March 2014 through December 2015, 57 subjects participated, evaluating a total of 228 intubations: 113 tracheal and 115 esophageal. Subjects were 84.0% male, mean age of 39 years (range: 22 - 62 years), with median experience of seven years (range: 0.6 - 39 years). Paramedics correctly identified ETT location in 158 (69.3%) cases without and 194 (85.1%) with ETT manipulation. The sensitivity and specificity of identifying esophageal location without ETT manipulation increased from 52.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43.0-61.0) and 86.7% (95% CI, 81.0-93.0) to 87.0% (95% CI, 81.0-93.0) and 83.2% (95% CI, 0.76-0.90) after manipulation (P<.0001), without affecting specificity (P=.45). Subjects correctly identified 41 previously incorrectly identified esophageal intubations. Paramedic experience, previous intubations, and POCUS experience did not correlate with ability to identify tube location.

Conclusion:

Paramedics can accurately identify esophageal intubations with POCUS, and manipulation improves identification. Further studies of paramedic use of dynamic POCUS to identify inadvertent esophageal intubations are needed.

LemaPC, O’BrienM, WilsonJ, St. JamesE, LindstromH, DeAngelisJ, CaldwellJ, MayP, ClemencyB.Avoid the Goose! Paramedic Identification of Esophageal Intubation by Ultrasound. Prehosp Disaster Med.2018;33(4):406–410

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The authors are responsible for the content and writing of this manuscript. This paper was presented at American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP; Irving, Texas USA) Scientific Assembly Research Forum, Chicago, Illinois USA on October 26, 2014 and New York ACEP Scientific Assembly Research Forum, Bolton Landing, New York USA on July 6, 2016.

References

1. Katz, SH, Falk, JL. Misplaced endotracheal tubes by paramedics in an urban Emergency Medical Services system. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(1):32-37.Google Scholar
2. Neumar, RW, Otto, CW, Link, MS, et al. Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2010;122(18 Suppl 3):S729-767.Google Scholar
3. Zadel, S, Strnad, M, Prosen, G, Mekis, D. Point of care ultrasound for orotracheal tube placement assessment in out-of-hospital setting. Resuscitation. 2015;87:1-6.Google Scholar
4. Link, MS, Berkow, LC, Kudenchuk, PJ, et al. Part 7: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S444-464.Google Scholar
5. Chou, HC, Tseng, WP, Wang, CH, et al. Tracheal rapid ultrasound exam (T.R.U.E.) for confirming endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation. Resuscitation. 2011;82(10):1279-1284.Google Scholar
6. Milling, TJ, Jones, M, Khan, T, et al. Trans-tracheal 2-D ultrasound for identification of esophageal intubation. J Emerg Med. 2007;32(4):409-414.Google Scholar
7. Drescher, MJ, Conard, FU, Schamban, NE. Identification and description of esophageal intubation using ultrasound. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7(6):722-725.Google Scholar
8. Chou, EH, Dickman, E, Tsou, PY, et al. Ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015;90:97-103.Google Scholar
9. Fiadjoe, JE, Stricker, P, Gurnaney, H, et al. Ultrasound-guided tracheal intubation: a novel intubation technique. Anesthesiology. 2012;117(6):1389-1391.Google Scholar
10. Gottlieb, M, Bailitz, J. Can trans-tracheal ultrasonography be used to verity endotracheal tube placement? Ann Emerg Med. 2015;66(4):394-395.Google Scholar
11. Hoffmann, B, Gullett, JP, Hill, HF, et al. Bedside ultrasound of the neck confirms endotracheal tube position in emergency intubations. Ultraschall Med. 2014;35(5):451-458.Google Scholar
12. Marciniak, B, Fayoux, P, Hebrard, A, Krivosic-Horber, R, Engelhardt, T, Bissonnette, B. Airway management in children: ultrasonography assessment of tracheal intubation in real time? Anesth Analg. 2009;108(2):461-465.Google Scholar
13. Werner, SL, Smith, CE, Goldstein, JR, Jones, RA, Cydulka, RK. Pilot study to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography in confirming endotracheal tube placement. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(1):75-80.Google Scholar
14. Abbasi, S, Farsi, D, Zare, MA, Hajimohammadi, M, Rezai, M, Hafezimoghadam, P. Direct ultrasound methods: a confirmatory technique for proper endotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med. 2015;22(1):10-16.Google Scholar
15. Adi, O, Chuan, TW, Rishya, M. A feasibility study on bedside upper airway ultrasonography compared to waveform capnography for verifying endotracheal tube location after intubation. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013;5(1):7.Google Scholar
16. Chou, HC, Chong, KM, Sim, SS, et al. Real-time tracheal ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2013;84(12):1708-1712.Google Scholar
17. Das, SK, Choupoo, NS, Haldar, R, Lahkar, A. Trans-tracheal ultrasound for verification of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(4):413-423.Google Scholar
18. Ma, G, Davis, DP, Schmitt, J, Vilke, GM, Chan, TC, Hayden, SR. The sensitivity and specificity of trans-cricothyroid ultrasonography to confirm endotracheal tube placement in a cadaver model. J Emerg Med. 2007;32(4):405-407.Google Scholar
19. Perper, J. Time of death and changes after death, Part I: anatomical considerations. In: Spitz W, Spitz D, (eds). Spitz and Fisher’s Medicolegal Investigation of Death: Guidelines for the Application of Pathology to Crime Investigation. Springfield, Illinois USA: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, LTD; 1993.Google Scholar
20. Heegaard, W, Hildebrandt, D, Spear, D, Chason, K, Nelson, B, Ho, J. Prehospital ultrasound by paramedics: results of field trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(6):624-630.Google Scholar
21. McCallum, J, Vu, E, Sweet, D, Kanji, HK. Assessment of paramedic ultrasound curricula: a systematic review. Air Med J. 2015;34(6):360-368.Google Scholar
22. Tessaro, MO, Salant, EP, Arroyo, AC, Haines, LE, Dickman, E. Tracheal rapid ultrasound saline test (T.R.U.S.T.) for confirming correct endotracheal tube depth in children. Resuscitation. 2015;89:8-12.Google Scholar
23. Brun, PM, Bessereau, J, Cazes, N, Querellou, E, Chenaitia, H. Lung ultrasound associated to capnography to verify correct endotracheal tube positioning in prehospital. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(9):2080 e2085-2086.Google Scholar