Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:03:46.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ability of Critical Care Medics to Confirm Endotracheal Tube Placement by Ultrasound

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2020

Michael Joyce
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Richmond, VirginiaUSA
Jordan Tozer*
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Richmond, VirginiaUSA
Michael Vitto
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Richmond, VirginiaUSA
David Evans
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Richmond, VirginiaUSA
*
Correspondence: Jordan Tozer, MD, FACEP, RDMS, RDCS Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia23298USA, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

The Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines were recently updated to include ultrasound confirmation of endotracheal tube (ETT) location as an adjunctive tool to verify placement. While this method is employed in the emergency department under the guidance of the most recent American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP; Irving, Texas USA) guidelines, it has yet to gain wide acceptance in the prehospital setting where it has the potential for greater impact. The objective of this study to is determine if training critical care medics using simulation was a feasible and reliable method to learn this skill.

Methods:

Twenty critical care paramedics with no previous experience with point-of-care ultrasound volunteered for advanced training in prehospital ultrasound. Four ultrasound fellowship trained emergency physicians proctored two three-hour training sessions. Each session included a brief introduction to ultrasound “knobology,” normal sonographic neck and lung anatomy, and how to identify ETT placement within the trachea or esophagus. Immediately following this, the paramedics were tested with five simulated case scenarios using pre-obtained images that demonstrated a correctly placed ETT, an esophageal intubation, a bronchial intubation, and an improperly functioning ETT. Their accuracy, length of time to respond, and comfort with using ultrasound were all assessed.

Results:

All 20 critical care medics completed the training and testing session. During the five scenarios, 37/40 (92.5%) identified the correct endotracheal placements, 18/20 (90.0%) identified the esophageal intubations, 18/20 (90.0%) identified the bronchial intubation, and 20/20 (100.0%) identified the ETT malfunctions correctly. The average time to diagnosis was 10.6 seconds for proper placement, 15.5 seconds for esophageal, 15.6 seconds for bronchial intubation, and 11.8 seconds for ETT malfunction.

Conclusions:

The use of ultrasound to confirm ETT placement can be effectively taught to critical care medics using a short, simulation-based training session. Further studies on implementation into patient care scenarios are needed.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AHA. Advanced Cardiac Life Support Guidelines. Dallas, Texas USA: AHA; 2015.Google Scholar
ACEP Board of Directors. ACEP Clinical Policy: Verification of Endotracheal Tube Placement. Irving, Texas USA: American College of Emergency Physicians; 2016.Google Scholar
Chun, R, Kirkpatrick, AW, Sirois, M, et al. Where’s the tube? Evaluation of hand-held ultrasound in confirming endotracheal tube placement. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;19(04):366-369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, EH, Dickman, E, Tsou, PY, et al. Ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015;90:97-103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann, B, Gullett, JP. Emergency ultrasound for the detection of esophageal intubation. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(4):464-465.Google ScholarPubMed
Milling, TJ, Jones, M, Khan, T, et al. Transtracheal 2-d ultrasound for identification of esophageal intubation. J Emerg Med. 2007;32(4):409-414.Google ScholarPubMed
Muslu, B, Sert, H, Kaya, A, et al. Use of sonography for rapid identification of esophageal and tracheal intubations in adult patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(5):671-676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, SC, Ryu, JH, Yeom, SR, Jeong, JW, Cho, SJ. Confirmation of endotracheal intubation by combined ultrasonographic methods in the Emergency Department. Emerg Med Aust. 2009;21(4):293-297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, SL, Smith, CE, Goldstein, JR, Jones, RA, Cydulka, RK. Pilot study to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography in confirming endotracheal tube placement. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(1):75-80.Google ScholarPubMed
Singh, M, Chin, KJ, Chan, VW, Wong, DT, Prasad, GA, Yu, E. Use of sonography for airway assessment: an observational study. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(1):79-85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Das, SK, Choupoo, NS, Haldar, R, Lahkar, A. Transtracheal ultrasound for verification of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesthesia. 2015;62(4):413-423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tonui, PM, Nish, AD, Smith, HL, Letendre, PV, Portela, DR. Ultrasound imaging for endotracheal tube repositioning during percutaneous tracheostomy in a cadaver model: a potential teaching modality. The Ochsner Journal. 2014;14(3):335-338.Google Scholar
Tejesh, C, Manjunath, A, Shivakumar, S, Vinayak, P, Yatish, B, Geetha, C. Sonographic detection of tracheal or esophageal intubation: a cadaver study. Saudi J Anaesthesia. 2016;10(3):314-316.Google ScholarPubMed