Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:52:28.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The 2012 Derecho: Emergency Medical Services and Hospital Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2014

Randy D. Kearns*
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North CarolinaUSA
Mark S. Wigal
Affiliation:
Office of Emergency Medical Services, West Virginia Bureau of Public Health, Charleston, West VirginiaUSA
Antonio Fernandez
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North CarolinaUSA
March A. Tucker Jr.
Affiliation:
Office of Emergency Medical Services, West Virginia Bureau of Public Health, Charleston, West VirginiaUSA
Ginger R. Zuidgeest
Affiliation:
ABC News, American Broadcasting Company, New York, New YorkUSA
Michael R. Mills
Affiliation:
Office of Emergency Medical Services, West Virginia Bureau of Public Health, Charleston, West VirginiaUSA
Bruce A. Cairns
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North CarolinaUSA
Charles B. Cairns
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North CarolinaUSA
*
Correspondence: Randy D. Kearns, DHA, MSA School of Medicine University of North Carolina 101 Manning Drive, CB 7600 Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 USA E-mail [email protected]

Abstract

During the early afternoon of June 29, 2012, a line of destructive thunderstorms producing straight line winds known as a derecho developed near Chicago (Illinois, USA). The storm moved southeast with wind speeds recorded from 100 to 160 kilometers per hour (kph, 60 to 100 miles per hour [mph]). The storm swept across much of West Virginia (USA) later that evening. Power outage was substantial as an estimated 1,300,000 West Virginians (more than half) were without power in the aftermath of the storm and approximately 600,000 citizens were still without power a week later. This was one of the worst storms to strike this area and occurred as residents were enduring a prolonged heat wave. The wind damage left much of the community without electricity and the crippling effect compromised or destroyed critical infrastructure including communications, air conditioning, refrigeration, and water and sewer pumps. This report describes utilization of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and hospital resources in West Virginia in response to the storm. Also reported is a review of the weather phenomena and the findings and discussion of the disaster and implications.

KearnsRD, WigalMS, FernandezA, TuckerMAJr, ZuidgeestGR, MillsMR, CairnsBA, CairnsCB. The 2012 Derecho: Emergency Medical Services and Hospital Response. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(5):1-4.

Type
Special Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Johns RH, Evans JS, Corfidi SF. About Derechos. NOAA NWS NCEP Storm Prediction Center 2013. http://www.spc.noaa.gov/misc/AbtDerechos/derechofacts.htm. Accessed August 1, 2013.Google Scholar
2. Prociv K. Comparing the 2012 and 2013 June derechos. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/06/18/comparing-the-2012-and-2013-june-derechos/. Accessed December 27, 2013.Google Scholar
3. US Census West Virginia Quick Facts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/54000.html. Accessed December 15, 2013.Google Scholar
4. Emergency Medical Services Performance Improvement Center. EMSPIC. 2013; www.emspic.org. Accessed November 22, 2013.Google Scholar
5. Vescio M, Fox M, Henderson J, et al. The Historic Derecho of June 29, 2012. In: Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service, ed. Silver Spring, Maryland; 2013:61.Google Scholar
6. National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration. Derecho Facts. http://www.spc.noaa.gov/misc/AbtDerechos/derechofacts.htm. Accessed December 26, 2013.Google Scholar
7. Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Disaster Declaration Process. http://www.fema.gov/declaration-process. Accessed August 6, 2013.Google Scholar
8. Federal Emergency Management Agency. West Virginia Severe Storms and Straight-Line Winds (DR-4071). http://www.fema.gov/disaster/4071. Accessed December 7, 2013.Google Scholar
9. Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA 322 Public Assistance Guide 2007. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/government/grant/pa/paguide07.pdf. Accessed December 7, 2012.Google Scholar
10.Martin, D. Joplin tornado offers response lessons. Health Facil Manage. 2013;26(7):48.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Ablah, E, Tinius, AM, Konda, K, Synovitz, C, Subbarao, I. Regional health system response to the 2007 Greensburg, Kansas, EF5 tornado. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2007;1(2):90-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Carlton, PK, Bringle, D. Business continuity after catastrophic medical events: the Joplin medical business continuity report. Am J Disaster Med. 2012;7(4):321-331.Google Scholar
13.Kouadio, IK, Aljunid, S, Kamigaki, T, Hammad, K, Oshitani, H. Infectious diseases following natural disasters: prevention and control measures. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012;10(1):95-104.Google Scholar
14.Fayard, GM. Fatal work injuries involving natural disasters, 1992-2006. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(4):201-209.Google Scholar
15.Hartmann, EH, Creel, N, Lepard, J, Maxwell, RA. Mass casualty following unprecedented tornadic events in the Southeast: natural disaster outcomes at a Level I trauma center. Am Surg. 2012;78(7):770-773.Google Scholar