Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:21:27.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-Ray Powder Diffraction Data and Unit Cells of Ammonium Paratungstate Tetrahydrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

John W. van Put ,
Theo W. Verkroost  and
Eduard J. Sonneveld
John W. van Put
Affiliation:
Department of Raw Materials Technology, Delft University of Technology, Mijnbouwstraat 120, 2628 RX Delft, The Netherlands
Theo W. Verkroost
Affiliation:
Department of Raw Materials Technology, Delft University of Technology, Mijnbouwstraat 120, 2628 RX Delft, The Netherlands
Eduard J. Sonneveld
Affiliation:
Technisch Physische Dienst TNO-TH, Stieltjesweg 1, 2628 CK Delft, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

X-Ray powder diffraction data and unit cell parameters of industrially produced, as well as bench scale prepared, ammonium paratungstate tetrahydrate are reported and compared with current Powder Data File (PDF) (1989) patterns. A least-squares refinement resulted in two slightly different unit cells. Both cells are monoclinic with S.G. = P21/n(14), Z = 2. The density, 4.639(2)kg/m3, calculated from one of these unit cells corresponds reasonably well with a measured value of 4.61 (2). It has, however, not been possible to determine at present why ammonium paratungstate tetrahydrate has two unit cells. No relation between the crystalline form and the method of preparation nor the exact water content could be established.

Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 167 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basu, A.K. & Sale, F.R. (1975). J. Mater. Sci. 10, 571–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawihl, W. (1940). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 244, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, H. T. Jr., & Price, E. (1983). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105, 4838–4839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, G.J. & Sale, F.R. (1981). J. Mater. Sci. 16, 3427–3436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hähnert, M. (1964). Z. Kristallogr., Kristallgeom., Kristallphys., Kristallchem. 120, 216–228.Google Scholar
Powder Data File (1989). Swarthmore, PA: International Centre for Diffraction Data.Google Scholar
Sonneveld, E.J. & Visser, J.W. (1975). J. Appl. Crystallogr 8, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Put, J.W., De Koning, P.M. & Van Sandwijk, A. (1990). Paper accepted for publication at the 11th Symp. on Ind. Crystall., Garmisch Partenkirchen FRG.Google Scholar